510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2025

Prolene Polypropylene Nonabsorbable Suture

K133356510(k) SpecialCleared Dec 6, 201336-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.5010Recalls 21

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

ETHICON, Inc. · GAW Suture, Nonabsorbable, Synthetic, Polypropylene

Cleared on Dec 6, 2013 as substantially equivalent to K946173 (ETHICON, Inc., 1995) after a 36-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1995. 4 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 21 times.

Decided
Dec 6, 2013
Review
36 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GAW
Recalls
21
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K946173 (1995). 4 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2016: 1 descendant cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared2017: 1 descendant cleared2023: 1 descendant clearedK946173 · Stainless Steel, Gut, Poly (Glycolide/L-Lactide) Polyamide, Polypropylene, Poly (Ethylene Terephthalate) and Silk · ETHICON, Inc. · 1995 · recalled1995200020052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 2 descendants2 generations forward: 1 descendant3 generations forward: 1 descendant K946173 · Stainless Steel, Gut, Poly (Glycolide/L-Lactide) Polyamide, Polypropylene, Poly (Ethylene Terephthalate) and Silk · ETHICON, Inc. · 1995 · recalled0
  1. Root · 1 generation backK946173 Stainless Steel, Gut, Poly (Glycolide/L-Lactide) Polyamide…ETHICON, Inc. · 1995 · Recalled
  2. This deviceK133356 Prolene Polypropylene Nonabsorbable SutureETHICON, Inc. · 2013
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK160623 FILASILK - Natural Non-absorbable Silk Surgical Suture, FILAMIDE -…M/s. Meril Endo Surgery Private Limited. · 2016
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK172149 FILASILK - Natural Non-absorbable Silk Surgical Suture, FILAMIDE -…M/s. Meril Endo Surgery Private Limited. · 2017
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 0 of its ownK231183 Non absorbable Surgical Polyester SutureShandong Haidike Medical Products Co., Ltd. · 2023
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK142639 StitchKitOrigami Surgical, LLC · 2014

Most influential descendants

Showing 4 of 4 · See all
  • K160623FILASILK - Natural Non-absorbable Silk Surgical Suture, FILAMIDE - Non Absorbable…M/s. Meril Endo Surgery Private Limited. · 2016 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K172149FILASILK - Natural Non-absorbable Silk Surgical Suture, FILAMIDE - Non Absorbable…M/s. Meril Endo Surgery Private Limited. · 2017 · 2 generations on1descendant
  • K231183Non absorbable Surgical Polyester SutureShandong Haidike Medical Products Co., Ltd. · 2023 · 3 generations on0descendants
  • K142639StitchKitOrigami Surgical, LLC · 2014 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K946173Stainless Steel, Gut, Poly (Glycolide/L-Lactide) Polyamide, Polypropylene…ETHICON, Inc.199510
0 (this device)K133356Prolene Polypropylene Nonabsorbable SutureETHICON, Inc.2013—
+1K160623FILASILK - Natural Non-absorbable Silk Surgical Suture, FILAMIDE - Non…M/s. Meril Endo Surgery Private Limited.2016—
+2K172149FILASILK - Natural Non-absorbable Silk Surgical Suture, FILAMIDE - Non…M/s. Meril Endo Surgery Private Limited.2017—
+3K231183Non absorbable Surgical Polyester SutureShandong Haidike Medical Products Co., Ltd.2023—
+1K142639StitchKitOrigami Surgical, LLC2014—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201410
201610
201710
202310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K133356, 1995–2023Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GAW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GAW device

  1. #1 K253572 STRATAFIX™ Spiral PRONOVA™ Unidirectional…score 14.4 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K946173Stainless Steel, Gut, Poly (Glycolide/L-Lactide) Polyamide, Polypropylene, Poly…
Summary page 1
…8.5010 Regulatory Class: 1I Product Code: GAW Predicate Devices: Labeling Changes for Generic Suture Types, by Ethicon Inc., K946 173, cleared January 9, 1995 PROLEN E Polypropylene Suture (Nonabsorba…
ETHICON, Inc.199510
*—PROLENE Polypropylene Suture (Nonabsorbable Surgical Suture, U.S.P., Type B)
Named without a submission number
—

Also cleared against K946173: 18 other devices →

What descends from it? (4)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K160623FILASILK - Natural Non-absorbable Silk Surgical Suture, FILAMIDE - Non Absorbable…M/s. Meril Endo Surgery Private Limited.20162
K142639StitchKitOrigami Surgical, LLC20140

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Mar 7, 2025Class IIZ-1515-2025Process controlIdentified curing issues with the silicone during the needles manufacturing process.
Dec 20, 2024Class IIZ-1096-2025Process controlSutures may have an open seal on the primary packaging, due to a manufacturing issue on a specific machine, and if issue is undetected could lead to breach in sterility, could introduce pathogens to the patient and cause infection.
May 7, 2018Class IIZ-2451-2018Package design/selectionThe needle associated with certain suture product codes has the potential to perforate the packaging due to a packaging design issue. A perforated package has the potential to cause a soft tissue injury to a healthcare professional…
May 7, 2018Class IIZ-2454-2018Package design/selectionThe needle associated with certain suture product codes has the potential to perforate the packaging due to a packaging design issue. A perforated package has the potential to cause a soft tissue injury to a healthcare professional…
May 7, 2018Class IIZ-2456-2018Package design/selectionThe needle associated with certain suture product codes has the potential to perforate the packaging due to a packaging design issue. A perforated package has the potential to cause a soft tissue injury to a healthcare professional…
May 7, 2018Class IIZ-2459-2018Package design/selectionThe needle associated with certain suture product codes has the potential to perforate the packaging due to a packaging design issue. A perforated package has the potential to cause a soft tissue injury to a healthcare professional…
May 7, 2018Class IIZ-2452-2018Package design/selectionThe needle associated with certain suture product codes has the potential to perforate the packaging due to a packaging design issue. A perforated package has the potential to cause a soft tissue injury to a healthcare professional…
May 7, 2018Class IIZ-2450-2018Package design/selectionThe needle associated with certain suture product codes has the potential to perforate the packaging due to a packaging design issue. A perforated package has the potential to cause a soft tissue injury to a healthcare professional…
May 7, 2018Class IIZ-2464-2018Package design/selectionThe needle associated with certain suture product codes has the potential to perforate the packaging due to a packaging design issue. A perforated package has the potential to cause a soft tissue injury to a healthcare professional…
May 7, 2018Class IIZ-2457-2018Package design/selectionThe needle associated with certain suture product codes has the potential to perforate the packaging due to a packaging design issue. A perforated package has the potential to cause a soft tissue injury to a healthcare professional…
May 7, 2018Class IIZ-2465-2018Package design/selectionThe needle associated with certain suture product codes has the potential to perforate the packaging due to a packaging design issue. A perforated package has the potential to cause a soft tissue injury to a healthcare professional…
May 7, 2018Class IIZ-2448-2018Package design/selectionThe needle associated with certain suture product codes has the potential to perforate the packaging due to a packaging design issue. A perforated package has the potential to cause a soft tissue injury to a healthcare professional…
May 7, 2018Class IIZ-2466-2018Package design/selectionThe needle associated with certain suture product codes has the potential to perforate the packaging due to a packaging design issue. A perforated package has the potential to cause a soft tissue injury to a healthcare professional…
May 7, 2018Class IIZ-2461-2018Package design/selectionThe needle associated with certain suture product codes has the potential to perforate the packaging due to a packaging design issue. A perforated package has the potential to cause a soft tissue injury to a healthcare professional…
May 7, 2018Class IIZ-2463-2018Package design/selectionThe needle associated with certain suture product codes has the potential to perforate the packaging due to a packaging design issue. A perforated package has the potential to cause a soft tissue injury to a healthcare professional…
May 7, 2018Class IIZ-2455-2018Package design/selectionThe needle associated with certain suture product codes has the potential to perforate the packaging due to a packaging design issue. A perforated package has the potential to cause a soft tissue injury to a healthcare professional…
May 7, 2018Class IIZ-2462-2018Package design/selectionThe needle associated with certain suture product codes has the potential to perforate the packaging due to a packaging design issue. A perforated package has the potential to cause a soft tissue injury to a healthcare professional…
May 7, 2018Class IIZ-2453-2018Package design/selectionThe needle associated with certain suture product codes has the potential to perforate the packaging due to a packaging design issue. A perforated package has the potential to cause a soft tissue injury to a healthcare professional…
May 7, 2018Class IIZ-2458-2018Package design/selectionThe needle associated with certain suture product codes has the potential to perforate the packaging due to a packaging design issue. A perforated package has the potential to cause a soft tissue injury to a healthcare professional…
May 7, 2018Class IIZ-2460-2018Package design/selectionThe needle associated with certain suture product codes has the potential to perforate the packaging due to a packaging design issue. A perforated package has the potential to cause a soft tissue injury to a healthcare professional…
May 7, 2018Class IIZ-2449-2018Package design/selectionThe needle associated with certain suture product codes has the potential to perforate the packaging due to a packaging design issue. A perforated package has the potential to cause a soft tissue injury to a healthcare professional…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K160623 (M/s. Meril Endo Surgery Private Limited., 2016) has gone furthest, with 2 descendants of its own.
  • 18 other devices also cite its predicate K946173.

How does its category compare?

All GAW devices

GAW Suture, Nonabsorbable, Synthetic, Polypropylene: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2013, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · GAW

1in 2024

2007: 12010: 22012: 32013: 32014: 22015: 32016: 12017: 32018: 32019: 12020: 22022: 22023: 12024: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 3 (2012) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GAW

80in 2018

2012: 86 days median2013: 36 days median2015: 252 days median2017: 145 days median2018: 80 days median
2007high 252 (2015) · low 36 (2013)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GAW

2so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2007: 12026 (partial year): 2
2007high 2 (2026) · low 0 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GAW

2,545in 2025

2007: 732008: 752009: 712010: 852011: 842012: 1942013: 1912014: 4372015: 4222016: 4402017: 4132018: 6852019: 1,8032020: 1,4932021: 1,6522022: 1,5632023: 1,8112024: 2,3482025: 2,545
2007high 2,545 (2025) · low 71 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GAW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—173
20080—075
20090—071
20102—085
20110—084
20123860194
20133360191
20142—0437
201532520422
20161—0440
201731450413
20183800685
20191—01,803
20202—01,493
20210—01,652
20222—01,563
20231—01,811
20241—02,348
20250—02,545
20261—2—

What is it indicated for?

PROLENE™ suture is indicated for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in cardiovascular, ophthalmic and neurological procedures.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K133356: Prolene Polypropylene Nonabsorbable Suture.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K133356

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026