510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Innesis Peek TL Cage

K140577510(k) TraditionalCleared Oct 1, 2014209-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Bk Meditech, Co., Ltd. · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Oct 1, 2014 as substantially equivalent to K120464 (Bk Meditech, Co., Ltd., 2013) after a 209-day review. Its family tree reaches back 9 generations to 2001. 2 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Oct 1, 2014
Review
209 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 9 generations to K003155 (2001). 28 ancestors in all, the oldest K841189 (1984). 2 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

  1. Root · 9 generations backK003155 Vertebral Body ReplacementOsteotech, Inc. · 2001
  2. 5 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK042571 Stryker Spine Avs TL Peek SpacerStryker Spine · 2005
  4. 2 generations backK050624 Stryker Spine Avs PL Peek SpacerStryker Spine · 2005
  5. 1 generation backK120464 Innesis Peek CageBk Meditech, Co., Ltd. · 2013
  6. This deviceK140577 Innesis Peek TL CageBk Meditech, Co., Ltd. · 2014
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK172756 Varian cageMedyssey USA, Inc. · 2017
  8. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK203327 VERTACONNECT TLIF CageSignus Medizintechnik · 2021
Show all 9 generations
  1. Root · 9 generations backK003155 Vertebral Body ReplacementOsteotech, Inc. · 2001
  2. 8 generations backK012254 VBROsteotech, Inc. · 2001
  3. 7 generations backK021791 Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2002
  4. 6 generations backK023570 Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2002
  5. 5 generations backK031780 Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2003
  6. 4 generations backK040731 Stryker Spine Vertebral SpacerStryker Spine · 2004
  7. 3 generations backK042571 Stryker Spine Avs TL Peek SpacerStryker Spine · 2005
  8. 2 generations backK050624 Stryker Spine Avs PL Peek SpacerStryker Spine · 2005
  9. 1 generation backK120464 Innesis Peek CageBk Meditech, Co., Ltd. · 2013
  10. This deviceK140577 Innesis Peek TL CageBk Meditech, Co., Ltd. · 2014

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K172756Varian cageMedyssey USA, Inc. · 2017 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K203327VERTACONNECT TLIF CageSignus Medizintechnik · 2021 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−9K003155Vertebral Body ReplacementOsteotech, Inc.2001—
−8K012254VBROsteotech, Inc.2001—
−7K021791Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2002—
−6K023570Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2002—
−5K031780Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek2003—
−4K040731Stryker Spine Vertebral SpacerStryker Spine2004—
−3K042571Stryker Spine Avs TL Peek SpacerStryker Spine2005—
−2K050624Stryker Spine Avs PL Peek SpacerStryker Spine2005—
−1K120464Innesis Peek CageBk Meditech, Co., Ltd.2013—
0 (this device)K140577Innesis Peek TL CageBk Meditech, Co., Ltd.2014—
+1K172756Varian cageMedyssey USA, Inc.2017—
+2K203327VERTACONNECT TLIF CageSignus Medizintechnik2021—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198410
199610
199930
200010
200160
200210
200310
200420
200710
201010
201110

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201710
202110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K140577, 2001–2021Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K120464Innesis Peek Cage
Summary page 5
…he INNESIS PEEK TL Cages are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices listed below: 510(k) Tradename Manufacturer K120464-PRIMARY PREDICATE INNESIS PEEK CAGE BK MEDITECH Co, Ltd. K100089-Reference predicate SYNTHES T-PAL SPACER…
Bk Meditech, Co., Ltd.2013—
†K100089Synthes T-Pal SpacerSynthes Spine20101
†K123388K7C SpacerK7, LLC2013—
†K100042Difusion Technologies Xiphos Interbody Fusion SystemDifusion Technologies2010—

Also cleared against K120464: 2 other devices →

What descends from it? (2)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K172756Varian cageMedyssey USA, Inc.20171

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 13 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 9 months on median.
  • 2 of the 28 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K172756 (Medyssey USA, Inc., 2017) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K120464.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2014, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The INNESIS PEEK TL Cage is indicated for intervertebral body fusion of the lumbar spine, from L2 to S1, in skeletally mature patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment. The device is intended for use at one level or two continuous levels for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The device system is designed for use with supplemental fixation and with autograft to facilitate fusion.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K140577: Innesis Peek TL Cage.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K140577

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026