510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2017

VIAL2BAG Direct Connect

K140730510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 12, 201480-day reviewClass II21 CFR 880.5440Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Medimop Medical Projects, Ltd. · LHI Set, I.V. Fluid Transfer

Cleared on Jun 12, 2014 as substantially equivalent to K072759 (Medimop Medical Projects, Ltd., 2007) and 1 other predicate after an 80-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 1988. 2 of the 14 devices in its family, counting itself, have a Class I recall. 1 later device descends from it. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Jun 12, 2014
Review
80 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LHI
Recalls
1
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K883614 (1988). 12 ancestors in all, the oldest K790472 (1979). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly. 2 of the 14 devices in this family, counting this one, have a Class I recall.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2000: 1 other ancestor2004: 1 other ancestor2001: 1 other ancestor1995: 1 other ancestor1994: 2 other ancestors1979: 1 other ancestor2017: 1 descendant cleared, 1 with a Class I recall1K883614 · Cytoguard (R) · Survival Technology, Inc. · 1988×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K972527 (1997), K980381 (1998) K051669 · Tevadaptor Closed Drug Reconstitution and Transfer System · Migada Plant · 2005 · recalledK072759 · VIAL2BAG · Medimop Medical Projects, Ltd. · 2007 · Class I recall19801990200020102020
  1. Root · 5 generations backK883614 Cytoguard (R)Survival Technology, Inc. · 1988
  2. 4 generations backK972527 Phaseal, System for Sealed Handling of Chemotherapeutic AgentsQuality System Consulting · 1997
  3. 3 generations backK980381 Phaseal, Closed System Forhandling of Parenteral Drugs, Additional…Carmel Pharma Ab. · 1998
  4. 2 generations backK051669 Tevadaptor Closed Drug Reconstitution and Transfer SystemMigada Plant · 2005 · Recalled
  5. 1 generation backK072759 VIAL2BAGMedimop Medical Projects, Ltd. · 2007 · Recalled (Class I)
  6. This deviceK140730 VIAL2BAG Direct ConnectMedimop Medical Projects, Ltd. · 2014
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK170095 Vial2Bag Direct ConnectMedimop Medical Project, Ltd. · 2017 · Recalled (Class I)

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K170095Vial2Bag Direct ConnectMedimop Medical Project, Ltd. · 2017 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−5K883614Cytoguard (R)Survival Technology, Inc.1988—
−4K972527Phaseal, System for Sealed Handling of Chemotherapeutic AgentsQuality System Consulting1997—
−3K980381Phaseal, Closed System Forhandling of Parenteral Drugs, Additional…Carmel Pharma Ab.1998—
−2K051669Tevadaptor Closed Drug Reconstitution and Transfer SystemMigada Plant20051
−1K072759VIAL2BAGMedimop Medical Projects, Ltd.2007Class I
0 (this device)K140730VIAL2BAG Direct ConnectMedimop Medical Projects, Ltd.2014—
+1K170095Vial2Bag Direct ConnectMedimop Medical Project, Ltd.2017Class I

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
197910
199420
199510
200010
200110
200410

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201711
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K140730, 1988–2017Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

2 devices in this family have a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LHI device

  1. #1 K252987 ADRx™ Admixture Devicescore 12.4 · 4 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K072759VIAL2BAG
Summary page 2
…entification: General Hospital Panel Predicate Devices: Vial2Bag from Medimop Medical Projects, Ltd, cleared by 510O(k) number K072759 Mixject Dispensing Pin (Vial Adapter) from Medimop Medical Projects,…
Medimop Medical Projects, Ltd.2007Class I
*K001293Modification to Mixject Dispensing Pin/with Detachable Vial Holder/with Detachable Vial…
Summary page 2
…er K072759 Mixject Dispensing Pin (Vial Adapter) from Medimop Medical Projects, Ltd cleared by 510O(k) number K001293 Device Description: TM TM The proposed device, Vial2B~…
Medimop Medical Projects, Ltd.2000—

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K170095Vial2Bag Direct Connect Class IMedimop Medical Project, Ltd.20170

Has anything in its family been recalled? (2 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Oct 6, 2017Class IIZ-0972-2018Process controlMedimop is recalling certain lots of this product Vial2Bag DC due to the potential of the IV Port separating from the Via12Bag DC body during the drug reconstitution I IV Set attachment process.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K072759VIAL2BAGMedimop Medical Projects, Ltd. · 2007 · Direct predicate · ◆ on the line of descent in FIG. 11 Class I recall
  • K170095Vial2Bag Direct ConnectMedimop Medical Project, Ltd. · 2017 · Cites it directly · ◆ in the 2017 descendants bar of FIG. 12 Class I recalls

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 26 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 6.5 years on median.
  • 3 of the 12 ancestors have a recall of any class; 1 has a Class I recall.
  • Of its descendants, K170095 (Medimop Medical Project, Ltd., 2017) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All LHI devices

LHI Set, I.V. Fluid Transfer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2014, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LHI

6in 2025

2007: 32008: 42009: 82010: 52011: 32012: 52013: 42014: 62015: 32016: 32017: 52018: 12019: 42020: 32021: 32022: 62023: 52024: 92025: 62026 (partial year): 2
2007high 9 (2024) · low 1 (2018)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LHI

196in 2025

2007: 89 days median2008: 154 days median2009: 95 days median2010: 139 days median2011: 99 days median2012: 127 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 63 days median2015: 99 days median2016: 159 days median2017: 56 days median2019: 247 days median2020: 189 days median2021: 396 days median2022: 278 days median2023: 90 days median2024: 166 days median2025: 196 days median
2007high 396 (2021) · low 56 (2017)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LHI

1in 2024

2007: 12008: 32009: 12010: 32011: 122013: 32016: 1, 1 Class I2017: 12018: 3, 3 Class I2019: 12022: 22023: 2, 2 Class I2024: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 12 (2011) · low 0 (2012)2026

Class I (6 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LHI

1,334in 2025

2007: 182008: 272009: 372010: 492011: 1552012: 5292013: 1542014: 1552015: 1282016: 2192017: 5362018: 1,4992019: 1,6342020: 1,1712021: 9332022: 1,8342023: 1,0472024: 1,2702025: 1,334
2007high 1,834 (2022) · low 18 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LHI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007389118
20084154327
2009895137
20105139349
201139912155
201251270529
201341023154
20146630155
20153990128
201631591 (1)219
20175561536
20181—3 (3)1,499
2019424711,634
2020318901,171
202133960933
2022627821,834
20235902 (2)1,047
2024916611,270
2025619601,334
20262—1—

What is it indicated for?

The Vial2BagTM Direct Connect is indicated to serve as a connecting part between the IV bag and an external IV line. The integrated vial adapter makes it possible to reconstitute and admix drugs from a vial into the infusion solution.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K140730: VIAL2BAG Direct Connect.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K140730

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026