510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Okamoto Studded Condom

K141256510(k) AbbreviatedCleared Jul 23, 201470-day reviewClass II21 CFR 884.5300

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Okamoto USA, Inc. · HIS Condom

Cleared on Jul 23, 2014 as substantially equivalent to K111093 (Mapa GmbH, 2011) after a 70-day review. Its family tree reaches back 6 generations to 1996.

Decided
Jul 23, 2014
Review
70 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HIS
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 6 generations to K952415 (1996). 19 ancestors in all, the oldest K871304 (1987). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 6 generations backK952415 Durex, Ramses, SheikLondon International U.S. Holdings, Inc. · 1996
  2. 5 generations backK983380 Durex Lubragel Latex CondomLondon Intl., LLC · 1998
  3. 4 generations backK032227 Durex Flavored Latex CondomSsl Americas, Inc. · 2004
  4. 3 generations backK081413 Twinlotus and Shields Natural Rubber Latex CondomDailian Latex Company, Ltd. · 2008
  5. 2 generations backK103119 Billy Boy Male Latex CondomSheila Pickering PHD · 2011
  6. 1 generation backK111093 Billy Boy Male Latex CondomMapa GmbH · 2011
  7. This deviceK141256 Okamoto Studded CondomOkamoto USA, Inc. · 2014
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−6K952415Durex, Ramses, SheikLondon International U.S. Holdings, Inc.1996—
−5K983380Durex Lubragel Latex CondomLondon Intl., LLC1998—
−4K032227Durex Flavored Latex CondomSsl Americas, Inc.2004—
−3K081413Twinlotus and Shields Natural Rubber Latex CondomDailian Latex Company, Ltd.2008—
−2K103119Billy Boy Male Latex CondomSheila Pickering PHD2011—
−1K111093Billy Boy Male Latex CondomMapa GmbH2011—
0 (this device)K141256Okamoto Studded CondomOkamoto USA, Inc.2014—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198710
198910
199020
199510
199910
200110
200230
200730
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K141256, 1996–2014Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HIS? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HIS device

  1. #1 K262108 FAMA Male Latex Condoms – Aqueous Lubricant…score 13.3 · 5 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K111093Billy Boy Male Latex Condom
Summary page 1
…0) Predicate Device: 1) Brand Name: BillyBoy Dotted (Beaded) condom Company Name: MAPA GmbH 5 10(k) Document Control Number: K1 11093 Description of the Device: This condom is made of a natural rubber latex sheath, which completely covers the penis with a close…
Mapa GmbH2011—
†K893039Condom (Rubber) ContraceptiveChinteik Hygiene Products Co., Ltd.1990—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 18 years and passes through 7 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.1 years on median.
  • None of the 19 ancestors has a recall.

How does its category compare?

All HIS devices

HIS Condom: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2014, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · HIS

5in 2025

2007: 72008: 32009: 52010: 12011: 32012: 72013: 42014: 72015: 32016: 52017: 42018: 22019: 12020: 42021: 52022: 102023: 22025: 52026 (partial year): 2
2007high 10 (2022) · low 0 (2024)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HIS

99in 2025

2007: 128 days median2008: 157 days median2009: 241 days median2011: 54 days median2012: 106 days median2013: 208 days median2014: 242 days median2015: 136 days median2016: 115 days median2017: 102 days median2020: 240 days median2021: 233 days median2022: 112 days median2025: 99 days median
2007high 242 (2014) · low 54 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HIS

1in 2013

2007: 12012: 12013: 1
2007high 1 (2007) · low 0 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HIS

20in 2025

2007: 102008: 112009: 122010: 222011: 152012: 102013: 192014: 162015: 82016: 52017: 82018: 112019: 152020: 122021: 162022: 182023: 102024: 72025: 20
2007high 22 (2010) · low 5 (2016)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HIS, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20077128110
20083157011
20095241012
20101—022
2011354015
20127106110
20134208119
20147242016
2015313608
2016511505
2017410208
20182—011
20191—015
20204240012
20215233016
202210112018
20232—010
20240—07
2025599020
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Okamoto Studded Condom is used for contraceptive and prophylactic purposes (to help prevent pregnancy and the transmission of sexually transmitted infections).

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K141256: Okamoto Studded Condom.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K141256

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026