510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Iogyn System

K141848510(k) SpecialCleared Aug 29, 201451-day reviewClass II21 CFR 884.1710

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Iogyn, Inc. · PGT Insufflator, Hysteroscopic, Fluid, Closed-Loop Recirculation With Cutter-Coagulator, Endoscopic, Bipolar

Cleared on Aug 29, 2014 as substantially equivalent to DEN130040 (Iogyn, Inc., 2014) after a 51-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2014. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Aug 29, 2014
Review
51 days
Class
Class II
Product code
PGT
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to DEN130040 (2014). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2024: 1 descendant clearedDEN130040 · Iogyn System · Iogyn, Inc. · 20142010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant DEN130040 · Iogyn System · Iogyn, Inc. · 20140
  1. Root · 1 generation backDEN130040 Iogyn SystemIogyn, Inc. · 2014
  2. This deviceK141848 Iogyn SystemIogyn, Inc. · 2014
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK233710 Symphion Operative Hysteroscopy SystemMinerva Surgical, Inc. · 2024

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K233710Symphion Operative Hysteroscopy SystemMinerva Surgical, Inc. · 2024 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1DEN130040Iogyn SystemIogyn, Inc.2014—
0 (this device)K141848Iogyn SystemIogyn, Inc.2014—
+1K233710Symphion Operative Hysteroscopy SystemMinerva Surgical, Inc.2024—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K141848, 2014–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in PGT? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new PGT device

  1. #1 K233710 Symphion Operative Hysteroscopy Systemscore 8.8 · 8 generations · no Class I recall
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*DEN130040Iogyn System
Our reading of the summary gave K132695, which is not in FDA’s 510(k) list. The device the summary names is FDA’s De Novo DEN130040, Iogyn System (Iogyn, Inc.), granted Mar 28, 2014; older De Novo requests were first filed under a 510(k) number, so this links to the grant.
Iogyn, Inc.2014—

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K233710Symphion Operative Hysteroscopy SystemMinerva Surgical, Inc.20240

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K233710 (Minerva Surgical, Inc., 2024) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All PGT devices

PGT Insufflator, Hysteroscopic, Fluid, Closed-Loop Recirculation With Cutter-Coagulator, Endoscopic, Bipolar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2014, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · PGT

1in 2024

2014: 22024: 1
2007high 2 (2014) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · PGT

Too few PGT 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · PGT

No recall names PGT since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · PGT

1in 2025

2015: 72016: 192017: 392018: 172019: 132020: 72021: 52022: 12023: 52024: 22025: 1
2007high 39 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code PGT, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20142—00
20150—07
20160—019
20170—039
20180—017
20190—013
20200—07
20210—05
20220—01
20230—05
20241—02
20250—01
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The IOGYN System is intended to distend the uterus by filling it with saline to facilitate viewing with a hysteroscope during diagnostic and operative hysteroscopy and provide fluid management through the closed-loop recirculation of filtered distension fluid. It is also intended for cutting and coagulation of uterine tissue such as intrauterine polyps and myomas using a bipolar resecting device.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K141848: Iogyn System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K141848

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026