510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

DANA

K141865510(k) TraditionalCleared Oct 15, 201497-day reviewClass U

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Anthrotronix, Inc. · LQD Recorder, Attention Task Performance

Cleared on Oct 15, 2014 as substantially equivalent to K122149 (Qbtech AB, 2012) after a 97-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1986.

Decided
Oct 15, 2014
Review
97 days
Class
Class U
Product code
LQD
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K854903 (1986). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 4 generations backK854903 Gordon Diagnostic System Model IClinical Diagnostics, Inc. · 1986
  2. 3 generations backK020800 Optax SystemOptax Systems, Inc. · 2002
  3. 2 generations backK040894 QbtestQbtech AB · 2004
  4. 1 generation backK122149 QBTESQbtech AB · 2012
  5. This deviceK141865 DANAAnthrotronix, Inc. · 2014
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K854903Gordon Diagnostic System Model IClinical Diagnostics, Inc.1986—
−3K020800Optax SystemOptax Systems, Inc.2002—
−2K040894QbtestQbtech AB2004—
−1K122149QBTESQbtech AB2012—
0 (this device)K141865DANAAnthrotronix, Inc.2014—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K141865, 1986–2014Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LQD? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K122149QBTES
Summary page 4
…ask Performance Recorder Classification Name: Recorder, Attention Task Performance Device Class: Unclassified Predicate Device: QbTest (K122149) Qbtech AB Unclassified Device Description: DANA is a mobile applicatio…
Qbtech AB2012—

Also cleared against K122149: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 28 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 8.3 years on median.
  • None of the 4 ancestors has a recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K122149.

How does its category compare?

All LQD devices

LQD Recorder, Attention Task Performance: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2014, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LQD

1in 2018

2012: 12014: 22016: 12017: 12018: 1
2007high 2 (2014) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LQD

Too few LQD 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · LQD

No recall names LQD since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · LQD

No MAUDE report names LQD since 2007.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20121—00
20130—00
20142—00
20150—00
20161—00
20171—00
20181—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

DANA provides clinicians with objective measurements of reaction time (speed and accuracy) to aid in the assessment of an individual's medical or psychological state. Factors that may affect the measurement of reaction time include, but are not limited to concussion, head injury, insomnia, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), memory impairment, dementia, delirium, prescription and…

Read the full statement (94 words)

DANA provides clinicians with objective measurements of reaction time (speed and accuracy) to aid in the assessment of an individual's medical or psychological state. Factors that may affect the measurement of reaction time include, but are not limited to concussion, head injury, insomnia, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), memory impairment, dementia, delirium, prescription and non-prescription medication, some nutritional supplements, as well as a variety of psychological states (e.g. fatigue and stress).

DANA also delivers and scores standardized psychological questionnaires. DANA results should be interpreted only by qualified professionals.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K141865: DANA.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K141865

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026