510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Porosteon Phusion Metal Cervical Cage

K142041510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 19, 2014144-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Porosteon, Inc. · ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical

Cleared on Dec 19, 2014 as substantially equivalent to K103033 (Zimmer Trabecular Metal Technology, 2011) after a 144-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2001. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Dec 19, 2014
Review
144 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ODP
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to P980048 (2001). 5 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2008: 1 other ancestor2007: 1 other ancestor2002: 1 other ancestor2020: 1 descendant clearedP980048 · Bak/Cervical (Bak/C) Interbody Fusion System · Sulzer Spine-Tech · 2001K103033 · Trabecular Metal Fusion Device Model 06-101-Xxxxx, 06-102-Xxxxx and 08-100-Xxxxx · Zimmer Trabecular Metal Technology · 2011200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 2 generations back: 3 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K103033 · Trabecular Metal Fusion Device Model 06-101-Xxxxx, 06-102-Xxxxx and 08-100-Xxxxx · Zimmer Trabecular Metal Technology · 2011P980048 · Bak/Cervical (Bak/C) Interbody Fusion System · Sulzer Spine-Tech · 20010
  1. Root · 2 generations backP980048 Bak/Cervical (Bak/C) Interbody Fusion SystemSulzer Spine-Tech · 2001
  2. 1 generation backK103033 Trabecular Metal Fusion Device Model 06-101-Xxxxx, 06-102-Xxxxx and…Zimmer Trabecular Metal Technology · 2011
  3. This deviceK142041 Porosteon Phusion Metal Cervical CagePorosteon, Inc. · 2014
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK201769 Cavetto [MAX] Cervical Cage SystemNeurostructures, Inc. · 2020

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K201769Cavetto [MAX] Cervical Cage SystemNeurostructures, Inc. · 2020 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2P980048Bak/Cervical (Bak/C) Interbody Fusion SystemSulzer Spine-Tech2001—
−1K103033Trabecular Metal Fusion Device Model 06-101-Xxxxx, 06-102-Xxxxx and 08-100-XxxxxZimmer Trabecular Metal Technology2011—
0 (this device)K142041Porosteon Phusion Metal Cervical CagePorosteon, Inc.2014—
+1K201769Cavetto [MAX] Cervical Cage SystemNeurostructures, Inc.2020—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200210
200710
200810

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202010
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K142041, 2001–2020Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in ODP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ODP device

  1. #1 K222276 CONDUIT Cages; FIBERGRAFT BG Puttyscore 53.4 · 25 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K103033Trabecular Metal Fusion Device Model 06-101-Xxxxx, 06-102-Xxxxx and 08-100-Xxxxx
Summary page 4
…device - cervical Classification Code: ODP – Class II Classification Panel: Orthopedic Regulation Number: 21 CFR section 888.3080 C. PREDICATE DEVICES K103033 Trabecular Metal Fusion Device; manufactured by Zimmer Trabecular Metal Technology, I…
Zimmer Trabecular Metal Technology2011—

Also cleared against K103033: 7 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K201769Cavetto [MAX] Cervical Cage SystemNeurostructures, Inc.20200

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 13 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 9.7 years on median.
  • None of the 5 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K201769 (Neurostructures, Inc., 2020) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 7 other devices also cite its predicate K103033.

How does its category compare?

All ODP devices

ODP Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2014, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · ODP

11in 2025

2008: 82009: 122010: 92011: 252012: 172013: 182014: 262015: 242016: 172017: 332018: 252019: 222020: 142021: 182022: 122023: 342024: 102025: 112026 (partial year): 19
2007high 34 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ODP

87in 2025

2008: 89 days median2009: 127 days median2010: 151 days median2011: 113 days median2012: 93 days median2013: 187 days median2014: 118 days median2015: 180 days median2016: 112 days median2017: 104 days median2018: 133 days median2019: 92 days median2020: 89 days median2021: 121 days median2022: 92 days median2023: 165 days median2024: 76 days median2025: 87 days median2026 (partial year): 117 days median
2007high 187 (2013) · low 76 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · ODP

2in 2025

2009: 12011: 12013: 12020: 12025: 2
2007high 2 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ODP

57in 2025

2008: 22009: 212010: 542011: 382012: 922013: 782014: 432015: 512016: 372017: 392018: 512019: 1412020: 862021: 1612022: 502023: 362024: 552025: 57
2007high 161 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ODP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
200888902
200912127121
20109151054
201125113138
20121793092
201318187178
201426118043
201524180051
201617112037
201733104039
201825133051
201922920141
20201489186
2021181210161
20221292050
202334165036
20241076055
20251187257
2026191170—

What is it indicated for?

The Phusion Metal Cervical Cage 1s indicated for intervertebral body fusion of the spine in skeletally mature patients.

The Phusion Metal Cervical Cage 1s intended for use at one level in the cervical spine, from C3 to C7, for the treatment of cervical disc disease (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies). The Phusion Metal Cervical Cage is to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment. Devices are intended to be implanted via an open, anterior approach and used with autogenous bone and supplemental fixation, such as an anterior plating system.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K142041: Porosteon Phusion Metal Cervical Cage.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K142041

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026