510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

DacryoCATH

K142914510(k) SpecialCleared Jan 12, 201597-day reviewClass U

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Armadillo Biomedical, LLC · OKS Lacrimal Stents And Intubation Sets

Cleared on Jan 12, 2015 as substantially equivalent to K113508 (Armadillo Biomedical, LLC, 2012) after a 97-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1994.

Decided
Jan 12, 2015
Review
97 days
Class
Class U
Product code
OKS
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K935233 (1994). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 2 generations backK935233 Iolab Lacrimal Duct CatheterChiron Vision Corp. · 1994
  2. 1 generation backK113508 DacryocathArmadillo Biomedical, LLC · 2012
  3. This deviceK142914 DacryoCATHArmadillo Biomedical, LLC · 2015
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K935233Iolab Lacrimal Duct CatheterChiron Vision Corp.1994—
−1K113508DacryocathArmadillo Biomedical, LLC2012—
0 (this device)K142914DacryoCATHArmadillo Biomedical, LLC2015—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K142914, 1994–2015Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in OKS? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new OKS device

  1. #1 K201892 Ritleng®+ and Ritleng®+ PVPscore 1.0 · 1 generation · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K113508Dacryocath
Summary page 4
…t Class Unclassified Panel Ophthalmic Product Code OKS Predicate K113508, DacryoCATH Description The lacrimal duct catheter is a sterile, single use, non-pyrogenic disposable balloon cathe…
Armadillo Biomedical, LLC2012—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 21 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 18.0 years on median.
  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.

How does its category compare?

All OKS devices

OKS Lacrimal Stents And Intubation Sets: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2015, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OKS

1in 2021

2012: 72013: 22014: 12015: 12016: 22017: 12020: 12021: 1
2007high 7 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OKS

277in 2012

2012: 277 days median
2007high 277 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OKS

No recall names OKS since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · OKS

3in 2022

2011: 22012: 32013: 32014: 82015: 142016: 212017: 182018: 62019: 82020: 22021: 62022: 3
2007high 21 (2016) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OKS, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—02
2012727703
20132—03
20141—08
20151—014
20162—021
20171—018
20180—06
20190—08
20201—02
20211—06
20220—03
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The lacrimal duct catheter is indicated for use during dilation of the obstructed nasolacrimal duct in the following populations:

a. The 2MM catheter is indicated for use during dilation of the obstructed nasolacrimal duct obstruction in patients over 12 months of age and under 30 months of age.

b. The 3 mm catheter is indicated for use during dilation of the obstructed nasolacrimal duct in children over 30 months of age.

c. The 5mm catheter is indicated for use in adults during dilation of a lacrimal duct obstruction or blocked dacryocystorhinostomy ostium as a result of the following: functional or complete nasolacrimal duct obstruction, dacryocystitis, or failed dacryocystorhinostomy.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K142914: DacryoCATH.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K142914

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026