510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

LYNC intramedullary implant

K143049510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 19, 2015119-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3040

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Novastep · HTY Pin, Fixation, Smooth

Cleared on Feb 19, 2015 as substantially equivalent to K070598 (Memometal Technologies, 2007) and 2 other predicates after a 119-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1996.

Decided
Feb 19, 2015
Review
119 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HTY
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K961522 (1996). 11 ancestors in all, the oldest K960385 (1996). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2011: 1 other ancestor2007: 2 other ancestors2002: 1 other ancestor1997: 1 other ancestor1998: 1 other ancestor1996: 1 other ancestorK961522 · Kirschner Wire (K-Wire) and Steinmann Pin · Synvasive Technology, Inc. · 1996K030665 · Bone Wire · Stork Instrumente GmbH · 2003×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K100736 (2010), K102072 (2010) 19952000200520102015
  1. Root · 4 generations backK961522 Kirschner Wire (K-Wire) and Steinmann PinSynvasive Technology, Inc. · 1996
  2. 3 generations backK030665 Bone WireStork Instrumente GmbH · 2003
  3. 2 generations backK100736 Kirschner and Guide WiresSmt Schilling Metalltechnik GmbH · 2010
  4. 1 generation backK102072 Memometal Implants (K-Snap & TI-Fuse)Memometal Technologies · 2010
  5. This deviceK143049 LYNC intramedullary implantNovastep · 2015
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K961522Kirschner Wire (K-Wire) and Steinmann PinSynvasive Technology, Inc.1996—
−3K030665Bone WireStork Instrumente GmbH2003—
−2K100736Kirschner and Guide WiresSmt Schilling Metalltechnik GmbH2010—
−1K102072Memometal Implants (K-Snap & TI-Fuse)Memometal Technologies2010—
0 (this device)K143049LYNC intramedullary implantNovastep2015—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
199710
199810
200210
200720
201110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K143049, 1996–2015Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HTY? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HTY device

  1. #1 K231272 OSSIOfiber® Pin Product Family, OSSIOfiber®…score 19.3 · 14 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K070598Memometal Intra-Medullary Bone Fastener, Models Smart Toe / X-Fuse
Summary page 4
…se, indication for use, mechanical characteristics technological characteristics & design): K070598 / K112197 K112197 is a re-submission of K070598 after Memometal Smart Toe® in…
Memometal Technologies2007—
*K112197Memometal Intra-Medullary Bone Fastener
Summary page 4
…indication for use, mechanical characteristics technological characteristics & design): K070598 / K112197 K112197 is a re-submission of K070598 after Memometal Smart Toe® intramedulla…
Memometal Technologies20111
*K102072Memometal Implants (K-Snap & TI-Fuse)
Summary page 5
…Original applicant: Memometal Technologies. And a second predicate (only for the material): K102072 Device name: Memometal implants (K-Snap & Ti-Fuse) Original applicant: Memo…
Memometal Technologies2010—

Also cleared against K070598: 13 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 19 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 6.5 years on median.
  • 1 of the 11 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 13 other devices also cite its predicate K070598.

How does its category compare?

All HTY devices

HTY Pin, Fixation, Smooth: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2015, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · HTY

5in 2025

2007: 62008: 62009: 22010: 92011: 62012: 42013: 42014: 82015: 82016: 62017: 52018: 42019: 42020: 52021: 52022: 42023: 52024: 12025: 52026 (partial year): 2
2007high 9 (2010) · low 1 (2024)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HTY

90in 2025

2007: 112 days median2008: 86 days median2010: 180 days median2011: 82 days median2012: 76 days median2013: 128 days median2014: 73 days median2015: 101 days median2016: 114 days median2017: 127 days median2018: 162 days median2019: 93 days median2020: 108 days median2021: 137 days median2022: 121 days median2023: 146 days median2025: 90 days median
2007high 180 (2010) · low 73 (2014)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HTY

2in 2022

2009: 12010: 12016: 22019: 12022: 22026 (partial year): 1
2007high 2 (2016) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HTY

39in 2025

2007: 462008: 382009: 362010: 332011: 1642012: 1292013: 1872014: 1492015: 1212016: 1282017: 822018: 1382019: 2222020: 2102021: 1482022: 962023: 1532024: 2972025: 39
2007high 297 (2024) · low 33 (2010)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HTY, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20076112046
2008686038
20092—136
20109180133
20116820164
20124760129
201341280187
20148730149
201581010121
201661142128
20175127082
201841620138
20194931222
202051080210
202151370148
20224121296
202351460153
20241—0297
2025590039
20262—1—

What is it indicated for?

The Lync® intramedullary implants are indicated for small bone reconstruction limited to inter-digital fusion of fingers and toes and small bone fusion.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K143049: LYNC intramedullary implant.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K143049

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026