510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

SL-PLUS MIA and SL-PLUS Femoral Stems with Ti/HA

K143096510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 24, 2015147-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3353

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Smith & Nephew, Inc. · LZO Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented

Cleared on Mar 24, 2015 as substantially equivalent to K122296 (Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2012) and 1 other predicate after a 147-day review. Its family tree reaches back 6 generations to 1994. 3 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Mar 24, 2015
Review
147 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LZO
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 6 generations to K932481 (1994). 7 ancestors in all. 3 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

  1. Root · 6 generations backK932481 SL-Plus and SLR-PlusEncore Orthopedics, Inc. · 1994
  2. 5 generations backK001942 SL-Plus and SLR-Plus StemsPlus Orthopedics · 2000
  3. 4 generations backK021178 SL-Plus Lateralized StemPlus Orthopedics · 2002
  4. 3 generations backK072852 SL-Plus Standard and Lateral Hip StemsSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2008
  5. 2 generations backK120211 SL-Plus Standard and Lateral Femoral Stem with TI/HA CoatingSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2012
  6. 1 generation backK122296 SL-Plus Mia Femoral Stems with TI/HA CoatingSmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2012
  7. This deviceK143096 SL-PLUS MIA and SL-PLUS Femoral Stems with Ti/HASmith & Nephew, Inc. · 2015
  8. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK223103 BethaLoc® stem cementless HAImplantcast GmbH · 2023
  9. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK260037 implantcast Packaging System UpdateImplantcast GmbH · 2026
  10. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK170473 C2 femoral stemLima Corporate S.P.A. · 2017

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K223103BethaLoc® stem cementless HAImplantcast GmbH · 2023 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K260037implantcast Packaging System UpdateImplantcast GmbH · 2026 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K170473C2 femoral stemLima Corporate S.P.A. · 2017 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−6K932481SL-Plus and SLR-PlusEncore Orthopedics, Inc.1994—
−5K001942SL-Plus and SLR-Plus StemsPlus Orthopedics2000—
−4K021178SL-Plus Lateralized StemPlus Orthopedics2002—
−3K072852SL-Plus Standard and Lateral Hip StemsSmith & Nephew, Inc.2008—
−2K120211SL-Plus Standard and Lateral Femoral Stem with TI/HA CoatingSmith & Nephew, Inc.2012—
−1K122296SL-Plus Mia Femoral Stems with TI/HA CoatingSmith & Nephew, Inc.2012—
0 (this device)K143096SL-PLUS MIA and SL-PLUS Femoral Stems with Ti/HASmith & Nephew, Inc.2015—
+1K223103BethaLoc® stem cementless HAImplantcast GmbH2023—
+2K260037implantcast Packaging System UpdateImplantcast GmbH2026—
+1K170473C2 femoral stemLima Corporate S.P.A.2017—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200910

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201710
202310
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K143096, 1994–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LZO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LZO device

  1. #1 K192827 Quadra-Pscore 19.3 · 10 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K122296SL-Plus Mia Femoral Stems with TI/HA Coating
Summary page 5
…Y, LWJ Device Description The SL-PLUS™ MIA Femoral Stem with Ti/HA coated by Medicoat AG is identical to the coated design of the SL-PLUS™ MIA Femoral Stem cleared via K122296. The subject stems are made from forged titanium alloy, Ti-6Al-7Nb, with a double coating (triple layer): titanium plasma sprayed…
Smith & Nephew, Inc.2012—
*K120211SL-Plus Standard and Lateral Femoral Stem with TI/HA Coating
Summary page 5
…ia premarket notification K122296. The SL-PLUS™ Femoral Stem with Ti/HA coated by Medicoat AG is identical to the coated design of the SL-PLUS™ Femoral Stem cleared via K120211. The subject stems are made from forged titanium alloy, Ti-6Al-7Nb, with a double coating (triple layer): titanium plasma sprayed…
Smith & Nephew, Inc.2012—

Also cleared against K122296: 2 other devices →

What descends from it? (3)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K223103BethaLoc® stem cementless HAImplantcast GmbH20231
K170473C2 femoral stemLima Corporate S.P.A.20170

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 21 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.1 years on median.
  • None of the 7 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K223103 (Implantcast GmbH, 2023) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K122296.

How does its category compare?

All LZO devices

LZO Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2015, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LZO

14in 2025

2007: 92008: 112009: 72010: 152011: 132012: 142013: 262014: 132015: 122016: 102017: 162018: 182019: 282020: 182021: 122022: 112023: 102024: 112025: 142026 (partial year): 9
2007high 28 (2019) · low 7 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LZO

119in 2025

2007: 87 days median2008: 63 days median2009: 83 days median2010: 78 days median2011: 87 days median2012: 98 days median2013: 100 days median2014: 85 days median2015: 115 days median2016: 177 days median2017: 257 days median2018: 163 days median2019: 109 days median2020: 112 days median2021: 170 days median2022: 279 days median2023: 122 days median2024: 111 days median2025: 119 days median2026 (partial year): 102 days median
2007high 279 (2022) · low 63 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LZO

1in 2025

2007: 22008: 132009: 422011: 102012: 142014: 12015: 12016: 92017: 52018: 22019: 42020: 32022: 42023: 22024: 12025: 1
2007high 42 (2009) · low 0 (2010)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LZO

3,244in 2025

2007: 1382008: 1252009: 1892010: 3942011: 5442012: 9632013: 1,3702014: 1,4772015: 1,3482016: 1,7282017: 2,1652018: 3,1332019: 3,0662020: 1,9632021: 2,1992022: 1,9852023: 2,0662024: 2,5862025: 3,244
2007high 3,244 (2025) · low 125 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LZO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20079872138
2008116313125
200978342189
201015780394
2011138710544
2012149814963
20132610001,370
2014138511,477
20151211511,348
20161017791,728
20171625752,165
20181816323,133
20192810943,066
20201811231,963
20211217002,199
20221127941,985
20231012222,066
20241111112,586
20251411913,244
202691020—

What is it indicated for?

The SL-PLUS™ MIA Stem and the SL-PLUS™ MIA Stem with Ti/HA (INTEGRATION-PLUS™) is indicated for: Indications Standard Stem The SL-PLUS MIA Hip Stem is indicated for individuals undergoing primary and revision surgery where other treatments or devices have failed in rehabilitating hips damaged as a result of trauma or noninflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDJD) or any of its composite diagnoses of osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, traumatic…

Read the full statement (386 words)

The SL-PLUS™ MIA Stem and the SL-PLUS™ MIA Stem with Ti/HA (INTEGRATION-PLUS™) is indicated for:

Indications Standard Stem

The SL-PLUS MIA Hip Stem is indicated for individuals undergoing primary and revision surgery where other treatments or devices have failed in rehabilitating hips damaged as a result of trauma or noninflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDJD) or any of its composite diagnoses of osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, traumatic arthritis, slipped capital epiphysis, fused hip, fracture of the pelvis, and diastrophic variant.

Indications Lateral Stem

The SL-PLUS MIA Laterialzed stem is intended for varus femur forms and trumpet shape of the proximal femur (champagne flute)

Hip components are also indicated for inflammatory degenerative joint disease including rheumatoid arthritis, arthritis secondary to a variety of diseases and anomalies, and congenital dysplasia; old, remote osteomyelitis with an extended drainage-free period, in which case, the patient should be warned of an above normal danger of infection postoperatively; treatments of nonunion, femoral neck fracture and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement that are unmanageable using other techniques; endoprosthesis, femoral osteotomy, or Girdlestone resection; fracture-dislocation of the hip; and correction of deformity.

These stems are for uncemented use only. These devices are intended to aid the surgeon in relieving the patient of hip pain and restoring hip motion.

The SL-PLUS™ Stem and the SL-PLUS™ Stem with Ti/HA (INTEGRATION-PLUS™) is indicated for:

Indications Standard Stem

The SL-PLUS Stem is intended for advanced hip joint wear due to degenerative, post-traumatic or rheumatoid arthritis; fracture or avascular necrosis of the femoral head

Indications Lateral Stem

The SL-PLUS Laterialzed stem is intended for varus femur forms and trumpet shape of the proximal femur (champagne flute)

Hip components are also indicated for inflammatory degenerative joint disease including rheumatoid arthritis, arthritis secondary to a variety of diseases and anomalies, and congenital dysplasia; old, remote osteomyelitis with an extended drainage-free period, in which case, the patient should be warned of an above normal danger of infection postoperatively; treatments of nonunion, femoral neck fracture and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement that are unmanageable using other techniques; endoprosthesis, femoral osteotomy, or Girdlestone resection; fracture-dislocation of the hip; and correction of deformity.

These stems are for uncemented use only. These devices are intended to aid the surgeon in relieving the patient of hip pain and restoring hip motion.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K143096: SL-PLUS MIA and SL-PLUS Femoral Stems with Ti/HA.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K143096

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026