510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Modpod

K150695510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 13, 2015148-day reviewClass II21 CFR 890.5900

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Hollywog, LLC · ITH Equipment, Traction, Powered

Cleared on Aug 13, 2015 as substantially equivalent to K051938 (Chattanooga Group, 2005) and 1 other predicate after a 148-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 1989.

Decided
Aug 13, 2015
Review
148 days
Class
Class II
Product code
ITH
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K894435 (1989). 20 ancestors in all, the oldest K834405 (1984). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2005: 2 other ancestors2003: 1 other ancestor2000: 3 other ancestors1999: 1 other ancestor1997: 1 other ancestor1988: 1 other ancestor1985: 1 other ancestor1992: 1 other ancestor1991: 1 other ancestor1989: 1 other ancestor1986: 1 other ancestor1984: 1 other ancestorK894435 · Vax-T Pelvic Traction Belt · Vat-Tech, Inc. · 1989K951622 · Vax-D Therapeutic Table · Vat-Tech, Inc. · 1996K981822 · DRS System · Professional Distribution Systems, Inc. · 1998K030060 · Spinemed · Cert Health Sciences, LLC · 2003K053223 · Triton/Tru-Trac/TX/Triton DTS Traction · Chattanooga Group · 20061980199020002010
  1. Root · 5 generations backK894435 Vax-T Pelvic Traction BeltVat-Tech, Inc. · 1989
  2. 4 generations backK951622 Vax-D Therapeutic TableVat-Tech, Inc. · 1996
  3. 3 generations backK981822 DRS SystemProfessional Distribution Systems, Inc. · 1998
  4. 2 generations backK030060 SpinemedCert Health Sciences, LLC · 2003
  5. 1 generation backK053223 Triton/Tru-Trac/TX/Triton DTS TractionChattanooga Group · 2006
  6. This deviceK150695 ModpodHollywog, LLC · 2015
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−5K894435Vax-T Pelvic Traction BeltVat-Tech, Inc.1989—
−4K951622Vax-D Therapeutic TableVat-Tech, Inc.1996—
−3K981822DRS SystemProfessional Distribution Systems, Inc.1998—
−2K030060SpinemedCert Health Sciences, LLC2003—
−1K053223Triton/Tru-Trac/TX/Triton DTS TractionChattanooga Group2006—
0 (this device)K150695ModpodHollywog, LLC2015—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198410
198510
198610
198810
198910
199110
199210
199710
199910
200030
200310
200520
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K150695, 1989–2015Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in ITH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new ITH device

  1. #1 K243775 True Non-Surgical Spinal Decompression System…score 10.6 · 4 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K051938Triton/Tru-Trac/TX Traction Devices
Summary page 5
…Page 5 === Legally marketed devices to which substantial equivalence is claimed: 510(k) # Predicate Proprietary Trade Name Predicate Regulation K051938 Triton®/Tru-Trac®/TX™ Traction CFR Title 21, Sec. 890.5900, Class II,…
Chattanooga Group2005—
*K053223Triton/Tru-Trac/TX/Triton DTS Traction
Summary page 5
…938 Triton®/Tru-Trac®/TX™ Traction CFR Title 21, Sec. 890.5900, Class II, ITH K053223 Triton®/Tru-Trac®/TX™ Traction CFR Title 21, Sec. 890.5900, Class II,…
Chattanooga Group2006—

Also cleared against K051938: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 26 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.6 years on median.
  • None of the 20 ancestors has a recall.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K051938.

How does its category compare?

All ITH devices

ITH Equipment, Traction, Powered: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2015, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · ITH

2in 2025

2007: 22008: 42009: 12010: 12011: 12012: 12014: 22015: 22023: 12024: 12025: 2
2007high 4 (2008) · low 0 (2013)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · ITH

132in 2008

2008: 132 days median
2007high 132 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · ITH

2in 2011

2011: 2
2007high 2 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · ITH

3in 2025

2007: 22009: 32010: 32011: 52012: 12013: 22014: 52015: 12016: 22017: 22019: 52021: 12023: 12024: 52025: 3
2007high 5 (2011) · low 0 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code ITH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—02
2008413200
20091—03
20101—03
20111—25
20121—01
20130—02
20142—05
20152—01
20160—02
20170—02
20180—00
20190—05
20200—00
20210—01
20220—00
20231—01
20241—05
20252—03
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

Modpod cervical traction provides mobilization of skeletal structures and muscles in static, intermittent, progressive, and regressive distraction forces to relieve pressures that may be causing pain of skeletal or muscular origin. These effects are achieved through decompression of intervertebral discs, that is, unloading due to distraction and positioning, and may be used to relieve peripheral radiation/sciatica and pain associated with: •Protruding…

Read the full statement (95 words)

Modpod cervical traction provides mobilization of skeletal structures and muscles in static, intermittent, progressive, and regressive distraction forces to relieve pressures that may be causing pain of skeletal or muscular origin. These effects are achieved through decompression of intervertebral discs, that is, unloading due to distraction and positioning, and may be used to relieve peripheral radiation/sciatica and pain associated with:

•Protruding discs

•Bulging discs

•Herniated discs

•Degenerative disc disease

•Posterior facet syndrome

•Acute facet problems

•Radicular pain

•Prolapsed discs

•Spinal root impingement

•Hypomobility

•Degenerative joint disease

•Facet syndrome

•Compressions fracture

•Joint pain

• Discogenic pain

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K150695: Modpod.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K150695

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026