510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

TRU Dental Implant System

K150968510(k) AbbreviatedCleared Jul 24, 2015102-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3640

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Sterngold Dental, LLC · DZE Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form

Cleared on Jul 24, 2015 as substantially equivalent to K071370 (Nobel Biocare AB, 2007) after a 102-day review. Its family tree reaches back 8 generations to 1990.

Decided
Jul 24, 2015
Review
102 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DZE
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 8 generations to K894595 (1990). 22 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 8 generations backK894595 Bonefit R Screw ImplantsInstitut Straumann AG · 1990
  2. 7 generations backK984104 Iti Dental Implant SystemStraumann USA · 1999 · Recalled
  3. 6 generations backK993595 Nobel Biocare's Modified Surface Implant (Intended for Immediate…Nobel Biocare Uas, Inc. · 2000
  4. 5 generations backK023113 Replace Tiunite Endosseous ImplantNobel Biocare Uas, Inc. · 2002 · Recalled
  5. 4 generations backK041661 Nobel Biocare Endosseous ImplantsNobel Biocare Uas, Inc. · 2004
  6. 3 generations backK050258 Groovy ImplantsNobel Biocare AB · 2005 · Recalled
  7. 2 generations backK061003 SFB & CFB ImplantsNobel Biocare AB · 2006
  8. 1 generation backK071370 Nobelactive Internal Connection ImplantNobel Biocare AB · 2007 · Recalled
  9. This deviceK150968 TRU Dental Implant SystemSterngold Dental, LLC · 2015
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−8K894595Bonefit R Screw ImplantsInstitut Straumann AG1990—
−7K984104Iti Dental Implant SystemStraumann USA19991
−6K993595Nobel Biocare's Modified Surface Implant (Intended for Immediate Loading Upon…Nobel Biocare Uas, Inc.2000—
−5K023113Replace Tiunite Endosseous ImplantNobel Biocare Uas, Inc.200227
−4K041661Nobel Biocare Endosseous ImplantsNobel Biocare Uas, Inc.2004—
−3K050258Groovy ImplantsNobel Biocare AB200528
−2K061003SFB & CFB ImplantsNobel Biocare AB2006—
−1K071370Nobelactive Internal Connection ImplantNobel Biocare AB20074
0 (this device)K150968TRU Dental Implant SystemSterngold Dental, LLC2015—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199320
199420
199630
199720
199810
200230
200510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K150968, 1990–2015Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DZE? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DZE device

  1. #1 K211090 ZENEX Implant Systemscore 25.4 · 15 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K071370Nobelactive Internal Connection Implant
Summary page 5
…ndications for Use, basic design, fundamental operating principles are the same or similar as the predicate devices. • Nobel Active Internal Connection Implant (K071370) – Primary Predicate • Sterngold Acid Etch Dental Implant System (K023580) – Reference Predicate Compatibility and subst…
Nobel Biocare AB20074
†K023580Sterngold Acid Etch Dental Implant SystemSterngold2003—

Also cleared against K071370: 28 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 25 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.9 years on median.
  • 5 of the 22 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 28 other devices also cite its predicate K071370.

How does its category compare?

All DZE devices

DZE Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2015, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · DZE

31in 2025

2007: 432008: 612009: 412010: 342011: 262012: 392013: 422014: 362015: 362016: 402017: 482018: 412019: 312020: 412021: 342022: 342023: 352024: 402025: 312026 (partial year): 15
2007high 61 (2008) · low 26 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DZE

184in 2025

2007: 107 days median2008: 118 days median2009: 110 days median2010: 162 days median2011: 194 days median2012: 174 days median2013: 195 days median2014: 265 days median2015: 215 days median2016: 219 days median2017: 223 days median2018: 200 days median2019: 231 days median2020: 230 days median2021: 182 days median2022: 243 days median2023: 248 days median2024: 222 days median2025: 184 days median2026 (partial year): 194 days median
2007high 265 (2014) · low 107 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DZE

1in 2025

2007: 112008: 42009: 32010: 32012: 112013: 12014: 72015: 32016: 152017: 42018: 42019: 82021: 62024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 2
2007high 15 (2016) · low 0 (2011)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DZE

465,788in 2025

2007: 2252008: 3932009: 1642010: 3602011: 3622012: 3582013: 3912014: 1,1242015: 2,8942016: 1,1162017: 9,7192018: 12,8922019: 167,0162020: 255,5242021: 479,6182022: 483,2242023: 537,5852024: 473,6292025: 465,788
2007high 537,585 (2023) · low 164 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DZE, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20074310711225
2008611184393
2009411103164
2010341623360
2011261940362
20123917411358
2013421951391
20143626571,124
20153621532,894
201640219151,116
20174822349,719
201841200412,892
2019312318167,016
2020412300255,524
2021341826479,618
2022342430483,224
2023352480537,585
2024402221473,629
2025311841465,788
2026151942—

What is it indicated for?

The TRU Implant System can be used in dental implant applications for oral rehabilitation of edentulous and partially dentate patients in the maxilla and mandible. Implant retained restorations may consist of single crowns or bridges as well as complete or partial dentures. The TRU Implant System is intended for delayed loading. It is also indicated for immediate loading with good primary stability and appropriate occlusal loading.

The TRU Implant System is only intended for use with straight abutments. The TRU implant body is intended to be placed such no angle correction is necessary.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K150968: TRU Dental Implant System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K150968

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026