510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2023

SenTec Digital Monitor, OxiVenT Sensor, V-Sign Sensor, Staysite Adhesive Pad, V-STATS PC Software including V-CareNet

K151329510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 17, 2015213-day reviewClass II21 CFR 868.2480Recalls 9

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Sentec AG · LKD Monitor, Carbon-Dioxide, Cutaneous

Cleared on Dec 17, 2015 as substantially equivalent to K101690 (Sentec AG, 2010) and 1 other predicate after a 213-day review. Its family tree reaches back 9 generations to 1994. 1 later device descends from it. It has been recalled 9 times.

Decided
Dec 17, 2015
Review
213 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LKD
Recalls
9
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 9 generations to K941811 (1994). 50 ancestors in all, the oldest K882609 (1989). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2010: 1 other ancestor2009: 1 other ancestor2007: 2 other ancestors2005: 2 other ancestors2001: 2 other ancestors1999: 2 other ancestors1996: 5 other ancestors2004: 2 other ancestors1998: 4 other ancestors1991: 3 other ancestors2000: 2 other ancestors1997: 3 other ancestors1994: 2 other ancestors1989: 4 other ancestors1993: 2 other ancestors1990: 1 other ancestor1995: 1 other ancestor1992: 1 other ancestor2024: 1 descendant clearedK941811 · HP M1175A, M1176A, Component Monitoring System · Hewlett-Packard Co. · 1994K960934 · HP M1205A Omnicare Component Monitor System Model 24 · Hewlett-Packard Co. · 1996×3: 3 generations cleared close together, K981376 (1999), K990125 (1999), K990972 (1999) K032979 · Philips SPO2 Reusable Sensors, Model Nos. M1191T, M1192T, and M1193T · Philips Medical Systems, Inc. · 2004K043463 · Envitec Reusable Multi-Site Y SPO2 Sensors · Envitec-Wismar GmbH · 2005K060675 · Envitec Reusable Softip Y SPO2 Sensors · Envitec-Wismar GmbH · 2006K101690 · Sentec Digital Monitor, V-Sign Sensor and V-Sign Sensor 2 with Digital Sensor Adaper Cable · Sentec AG · 2010 · recalled1990200020102020
  1. Root · 9 generations backK941811 HP M1175A, M1176A, Component Monitoring SystemHewlett-Packard Co. · 1994
  2. 5 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK043463 Envitec Reusable Multi-Site Y SPO2 SensorsEnvitec-Wismar GmbH · 2005
  4. 2 generations backK060675 Envitec Reusable Softip Y SPO2 SensorsEnvitec-Wismar GmbH · 2006
  5. 1 generation backK101690 Sentec Digital Monitor, V-Sign Sensor and V-Sign Sensor 2 with…Sentec AG · 2010 · Recalled
  6. This deviceK151329 SenTec Digital Monitor, OxiVenT Sensor, V-Sign Sensor, Staysite…Sentec AG · 2015
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK232516 Sentec Digital Monitoring System (SDMS) tCOM+Sentec AG · 2024
Show all 9 generations
  1. Root · 9 generations backK941811 HP M1175A, M1176A, Component Monitoring SystemHewlett-Packard Co. · 1994
  2. 8 generations backK960934 HP M1205A Omnicare Component Monitor System Model 24Hewlett-Packard Co. · 1996
  3. 7 generations backK981376 Hewlett-Packard M1205A Viridia 24 CTHewlett-Packard Co. · 1999
  4. 6 generations backK990125 HP Viridia Component Monitoring System, Model Rev. KHewlett-Packard GmbH · 1999
  5. 5 generations backK990972 HP Viridia Component Monitoring System, HP Viridia CMS 24/26, HP…Hewlett-Packard GmbH · 1999
  6. 4 generations backK032979 Philips SPO2 Reusable Sensors, Model Nos. M1191T, M1192T, and M1193TPhilips Medical Systems, Inc. · 2004
  7. 3 generations backK043463 Envitec Reusable Multi-Site Y SPO2 SensorsEnvitec-Wismar GmbH · 2005
  8. 2 generations backK060675 Envitec Reusable Softip Y SPO2 SensorsEnvitec-Wismar GmbH · 2006
  9. 1 generation backK101690 Sentec Digital Monitor, V-Sign Sensor and V-Sign Sensor 2 with…Sentec AG · 2010 · Recalled
  10. This deviceK151329 SenTec Digital Monitor, OxiVenT Sensor, V-Sign Sensor, Staysite…Sentec AG · 2015

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K232516Sentec Digital Monitoring System (SDMS) tCOM+Sentec AG · 2024 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−9K941811HP M1175A, M1176A, Component Monitoring SystemHewlett-Packard Co.1994—
−8K960934HP M1205A Omnicare Component Monitor System Model 24Hewlett-Packard Co.1996—
−7K981376Hewlett-Packard M1205A Viridia 24 CTHewlett-Packard Co.1999—
−6K990125HP Viridia Component Monitoring System, Model Rev. KHewlett-Packard GmbH1999—
−5K990972HP Viridia Component Monitoring System, HP Viridia CMS 24/26, HP Viridia…Hewlett-Packard GmbH1999—
−4K032979Philips SPO2 Reusable Sensors, Model Nos. M1191T, M1192T, and M1193TPhilips Medical Systems, Inc.2004—
−3K043463Envitec Reusable Multi-Site Y SPO2 SensorsEnvitec-Wismar GmbH2005—
−2K060675Envitec Reusable Softip Y SPO2 SensorsEnvitec-Wismar GmbH2006—
−1K101690Sentec Digital Monitor, V-Sign Sensor and V-Sign Sensor 2 with Digital Sensor…Sentec AG201012
0 (this device)K151329SenTec Digital Monitor, OxiVenT Sensor, V-Sign Sensor, Staysite Adhesive Pad…Sentec AG2015—
+1K232516Sentec Digital Monitoring System (SDMS) tCOM+Sentec AG2024—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198940
199010
199130
199210
199320
199420
199510
199650
199730
199840
199920
200020
200120
200420
200520
200720
200910
201010

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K151329, 1994–2024Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LKD? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LKD device

  1. #1 K232516 Sentec Digital Monitoring System (SDMS) tCOM+score 10.1 · 10 generations · no Class I recall
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K101690Sentec Digital Monitor, V-Sign Sensor and V-Sign Sensor 2 with Digital Sensor Adaper Cable
Summary page 5
…monitoring for monitoring of PCO2, SpO2, and PR at SenTec Digital Monitoring the ear lobe, forehead and cheek in adult and K101690 SenTec AG System pediatric patients and…
Sentec AG201012
*K093154TCM Tosca Monitoring System, TCM Combim Monitoring System
Summary page 5
…conventional PCO2 measurement sites. This device is the predicate for PO2 monitoring on K093154 TCM CombiM Radiometer conventional PO2 monitoring sites in adult and…
Radiometer Medical Aps20103

Also cleared against K101690: 2 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K232516Sentec Digital Monitoring System (SDMS) tCOM+Sentec AG20240

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jul 25, 2023Class IIZ-2592-2023Process controlDuring rework of components during the manufacturing process, an additional piece of material may have been left in the device, which may result in an impact on measurement performance.
Aug 22, 2022Class IIZ-0148-2023Under Investigation by firmWeak skin adhesion.
Dec 10, 2020Class IIZ-1134-2021Device DesignDevice requires the use of an Isolation Transformer in combination with the SDM in home care settings to comply with applicable safety standards.
May 2, 2019Class IIZ-2155-2019Process controlThere is an increased chance (approx. 5%) of no electrolyte or a reduced amount of electrolyte being applied to the sensor during the membrane change procedure.
May 2, 2019Class IIZ-2153-2019Process controlThere is an increased chance (approx. 5%) of no electrolyte or a reduced amount of electrolyte being applied to the sensor during the membrane change procedure.
May 2, 2019Class IIZ-2154-2019Process controlThere is an increased chance (approx. 5%) of no electrolyte or a reduced amount of electrolyte being applied to the sensor during the membrane change procedure.
May 2, 2019Class IIZ-2152-2019Process controlThere is an increased chance (approx. 5%) of no electrolyte or a reduced amount of electrolyte being applied to the sensor during the membrane change procedure.
May 2, 2019Class IIZ-2156-2019Process controlThere is an increased chance (approx. 5%) of no electrolyte or a reduced amount of electrolyte being applied to the sensor during the membrane change procedure.
Sep 15, 2016Class IIZ-0088-2017Component change controlSentec AG found that with one batch of an internal SenTec Monitor component (Docking Station Module) there is a risk that a fastening screw could become loose under certain circumstances. A loose screw within the monitor can create…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 21 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.1 years on median.
  • 8 of the 49 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K232516 (Sentec AG, 2024) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K101690.

How does its category compare?

All LKD devices

LKD Monitor, Carbon-Dioxide, Cutaneous: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2015, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LKD

1in 2024

2010: 22011: 12013: 12015: 12024: 1
2007high 2 (2010) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LKD

Too few LKD 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · LKD

1in 2022

2009: 42011: 12012: 22014: 12016: 12022: 1
2007high 4 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LKD

3in 2025

2010: 82012: 42013: 12014: 212015: 202016: 42019: 32020: 62021: 22023: 12024: 12025: 3
2007high 21 (2014) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LKD, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—40
20102—08
20111—10
20120—24
20131—01
20140—121
20151—020
20160—14
20170—00
20180—00
20190—03
20200—06
20210—02
20220—10
20230—01
20241—01
20250—03
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The SenTec Digital Monitoring System – consisting of the SenTec Digital Monitor (SDM), Sensors and Accessories – is indicated for continuous, noninvasive patient monitoring. The SenTec Digital Monitoring System is indicated for use in clinical and non-clinical settings such as hospitals, hospital-type facilities, intra-hospital transport environments, clinics, physician offices, ambulatory surgery centers and – if under clinical supervision– home…

Read the full statement (538 words)

The SenTec Digital Monitoring System – consisting of the SenTec Digital Monitor (SDM), Sensors and Accessories – is indicated for continuous, noninvasive patient monitoring. The SenTec Digital Monitoring System is indicated for use in clinical and non-clinical settings such as hospitals, hospital-type facilities, intra-hospital transport environments, clinics, physician offices, ambulatory surgery centers and – if under clinical supervision– home environments. The SenTec Digital Monitoring System is for prescription use only.

The V-Sign Sensor 2, model VS-A/P/N, is indicated for use with the SenTec Digital Monitor when continuous, noninvasive monitoring of carbon dioxide tension, oxygen saturation, and pulse rate are required for adult and pediatric patients. In neonatal patients the use of V-Sign Sensor 2 is indicated for carbon dioxide tension monitoring only.

The OxiVenT Sensor, model OV-A/P/N, is indicated for use with the SenTec Digital Monitor when continuous, noninvasive monitoring of carbon dioxide tension and oxygen tension as well as oxygen saturation and pulse rate are required for adult and pediatric patients. In neonatal patients the use of OxiVenT Sensor is indicated for carbon dioxide and oxygen tension monitoring only. Oxygen tension monitoring is contraindicated for patients under gas anesthesia.

SenTec’s Ear Clip, model EC-MI, is intended for use with the V-Sign Sensor 2 when continuous, noninvasive carbon dioxide tension, oxygen saturation and pulse rate monitoring and with the OxiVenT Sensor when continuous, noninvasive carbon dioxide and oxygen tension monitoring as well as oxygen saturation and pulse rate monitoring are required. The Ear Clip is for single-patient use and is indicated to attach the V-Sign Sensor 2 or OxiVenT Sensor to the earlobe of the patient. The use of the Ear Clip is contraindicated for patients whose earlobes are too small to ensure adequate sensor application.

SenTec’s Multi-Site Attachment Rings, model MAR-SF and model MAR-MI, are intended to attach V-Sign Sensor 2 to conventional measurement sites for carbon dioxide tension monitoring when continuous, noninvasive carbon dioxide tension monitoring is required for adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients. The Multi-Site Attachment Rings, model MAR-SF and model MAR-MI, are intended to attach the OxiVenT Sensor to conventional measurement sites for carbon dioxide and/or oxygen tension monitoring when continuous, noninvasive carbon dioxide and/or oxygen tension monitoring is required for adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients. If oxygen saturation and pulse rate monitoring are (additionally) required in adult and pediatric patients the Multi-Site Attachment Rings, model MAR-SF and model MAR-MI, are intended to attach the V-Sign Sensor 2 or the OxiVenT Sensor to the forehead, cheek, upper arm as well as on the back above the shoulder blade. The Multi-Site Attachment Rings, model MAR-SF and model MAR-MI, are for single use.

SenTec’s Staysite Adhesive pad for MAR, model SA-MAR, is an optional, single-use adhesive pad which is indicated for use with Multi-Site Attachment Rings, models MAR-MI and MAR-SF, if more secure attachment is required. The Staysite Adhesive pad for MAR, model SA-MAR, is for single use.

V-STATS is an optional PC-based software which is indicated for use with the SenTec Digital Monitor (SDM) when remote monitoring and/ or trend reporting and statistical analysis of data measured by the SDM is required. V-STATS is not intended to provide diagnosis; it is intended to supplement and not to replace any part of the SDM monitoring procedures.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K151329: SenTec Digital Monitor, OxiVenT Sensor, V-Sign Sensor, Staysite Adhesive Pad, V-STATS PC Software including V-CareNet.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K151329

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026