510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Demand Nasal Oxygen Cannula, Modified Demand Nasal Oxygen Cannula

K151506510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 11, 2016281-day reviewClass II21 CFR 868.5905

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Salter Labs · NFB Conserver, Oxygen

Cleared on Mar 11, 2016 as substantially equivalent to K890298 (Salter Labs, 1989) and 1 other predicate after a 281-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1989.

Decided
Mar 11, 2016
Review
281 days
Class
Class II
Product code
NFB
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K890298 (1989). 2 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1989: 1 other ancestorK890298 · Demand Nasal Oxygen Cannula Models 4008/4108/4208 · Salter Labs · 19891985199019952000200520102015
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor K890298 · Demand Nasal Oxygen Cannula Models 4008/4108/4208 · Salter Labs · 19890
  1. Root · 1 generation backK890298 Demand Nasal Oxygen Cannula Models 4008/4108/4208Salter Labs · 1989
  2. This deviceK151506 Demand Nasal Oxygen Cannula, Modified Demand Nasal Oxygen CannulaSalter Labs · 2016
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K890298Demand Nasal Oxygen Cannula Models 4008/4108/4208Salter Labs1989—
0 (this device)K151506Demand Nasal Oxygen Cannula, Modified Demand Nasal Oxygen CannulaSalter Labs2016—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198910
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K151506, 1989–2016Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in NFB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new NFB device

  1. #1 K250322 Respond OC Conserving Regulator (130-0800)score 10.6 · 4 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K890298Demand Nasal Oxygen Cannula Models 4008/4108/4208
Summary page 4
…: 868.5905 Classification: I Classification Panel: Anaesthesiology C. Predicate Devices: This submission demonstrates substantial equivalence to the predicate devices: K890298, Demand Nasal Oxygen Cannula K892407, Modified Demand Nasal Oxygen Cannula Page 50 of 58 Page 050 of 161 Device…
Salter Labs1989—
*K892407Modified Demand Nasal Oxygen Cannula
Summary page 4
…ication Panel: Anaesthesiology C. Predicate Devices: This submission demonstrates substantial equivalence to the predicate devices: K890298, Demand Nasal Oxygen Cannula K892407, Modified Demand Nasal Oxygen Cannula Page 50 of 58 Page 050 of 161 Device Descriptions The demand cannula is a…
Salter Labs1989—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.

How does its category compare?

All NFB devices

NFB Conserver, Oxygen: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2016, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · NFB

1in 2025

2007: 12009: 12010: 12011: 12013: 12016: 12020: 12022: 22025: 1
2007high 2 (2022) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NFB

Too few NFB 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · NFB

3in 2007

2007: 3
2007high 3 (2007) · low 0 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · NFB

8in 2025

2007: 32011: 12012: 32013: 52014: 22015: 42017: 92020: 32021: 22022: 12023: 42024: 12025: 8
2007high 9 (2017) · low 0 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NFB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—33
20080—00
20091—00
20101—00
20111—01
20120—03
20131—05
20140—02
20150—04
20161—00
20170—09
20180—00
20190—00
20201—03
20210—02
20222—01
20230—04
20240—01
20251—08
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The intended use is to deliver oxygen to the patient nasally, controlled by a demand system

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K151506: Demand Nasal Oxygen Cannula, Modified Demand Nasal Oxygen Cannula.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K151506

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026