510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2020

Cogent Hemodynamic Monitoring System

K152006510(k) TraditionalCleared May 5, 2016289-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.1120Recalls 4

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Icu Medical, Inc. · DXQ Blood Pressure Cuff

Cleared on May 5, 2016 as substantially equivalent to K021874 (Abbott Laboratories, 2002) and 1 other predicate after a 289-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1986. 1 later device descends from it. It has been recalled 4 times.

Decided
May 5, 2016
Review
289 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DXQ
Recalls
4
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K853018 (1986). 4 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2013: 1 other ancestor1994: 1 other ancestor2023: 1 descendant clearedK853018 · Model 3000 Opticath Computer · Oximetrix, Inc. · 1986 · recalledK021874 · Abbott Q2 Plus S02/Continuous Cardiac Output Computer, List Number 56711 · Abbott Laboratories · 20021990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor2 generations back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K021874 · Abbott Q2 Plus S02/Continuous Cardiac Output Computer, List Number 56711 · Abbott Laboratories · 2002K853018 · Model 3000 Opticath Computer · Oximetrix, Inc. · 1986 · recalled0
  1. Root · 2 generations backK853018 Model 3000 Opticath ComputerOximetrix, Inc. · 1986 · Recalled
  2. 1 generation backK021874 Abbott Q2 Plus S02/Continuous Cardiac Output Computer, List Number…Abbott Laboratories · 2002
  3. This deviceK152006 Cogent Hemodynamic Monitoring SystemIcu Medical, Inc. · 2016
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK232048 Cogent™ Hemodynamic Monitoring System; Cogent™ HMSIcu Medical · 2023

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K232048Cogent™ Hemodynamic Monitoring System; Cogent™ HMSIcu Medical · 2023 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K853018Model 3000 Opticath ComputerOximetrix, Inc.19862
−1K021874Abbott Q2 Plus S02/Continuous Cardiac Output Computer, List Number 56711Abbott Laboratories2002—
0 (this device)K152006Cogent Hemodynamic Monitoring SystemIcu Medical, Inc.2016—
+1K232048Cogent™ Hemodynamic Monitoring System; Cogent™ HMSIcu Medical2023—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199410
201310

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202310
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K152006, 1986–2023Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DXQ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DXQ device

  1. #1 K254287 Medline Reusable Blood Pressure Cuffscore 13.3 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K021874Abbott Q2 Plus S02/Continuous Cardiac Output Computer, List Number 56711
Summary page 4
…Regulatory Class: II Product Code: DXG and DQA 3 Predicate Devices Primary predicate: Abbott Q2 Plus SO2/Continuous Cardiac Output Computer, K021874 Secondary predicate: LiDCOrapid Hemodynamic Monitor, K122247 These predicates have not been subjected to a design-related recall.…
Abbott Laboratories2002—
*K122247Lidcorapid V2 Monitor
Summary page 4
…DXG and DQA 3 Predicate Devices Primary predicate: Abbott Q2 Plus SO2/Continuous Cardiac Output Computer, K021874 Secondary predicate: LiDCOrapid Hemodynamic Monitor, K122247 These predicates have not been subjected to a design-related recall. 4 Device Description The CogentTM HMS system is designed to…
Lidco, Ltd.2013—

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K232048Cogent™ Hemodynamic Monitoring System; Cogent™ HMSIcu Medical20230

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Nov 9, 2020Class IIZ-0859-2021Software designDue to a potential software issue, the display may show the incorrect continuous cardiac output (CCO) values after PulseCO calibration.
Feb 14, 2020Class IIZ-1927-2020Software Design ChangeFirm identified software issues which leads to the patient ID and patient information not being stored in the system.
Jul 12, 2019Class IIZ-1835-2020Under Investigation by firmFirm identified several software issues through internal testing of its Cogent Hemodynamic Monitoring System. These issues may result in inaccurate monitoring data, unit shutdown, and/or loss of display of a secondary parameter.
Jan 5, 2018Class IIZ-1775-2018Software designWhen continuous cardiac output monitoring with a pulmonary artery catheter is placed in the Pause mode, the catheter thermal coil may continue while in pause mode.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 30 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 16.5 years on median.
  • 2 of the 4 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K232048 (Icu Medical, 2023) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All DXQ devices

DXQ Blood Pressure Cuff: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2016, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · DXQ

3in 2025

2007: 22008: 72009: 52010: 22011: 52012: 42013: 22014: 42015: 102016: 42017: 22018: 52019: 32020: 32021: 42022: 42023: 52024: 22025: 32026 (partial year): 4
2007high 10 (2015) · low 2 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DXQ

174in 2025

2008: 118 days median2009: 57 days median2011: 121 days median2012: 102 days median2014: 105 days median2015: 59 days median2016: 217 days median2018: 225 days median2019: 44 days median2020: 207 days median2021: 105 days median2022: 105 days median2023: 79 days median2025: 174 days median2026 (partial year): 102 days median
2007high 225 (2018) · low 44 (2019)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DXQ

1in 2025

2011: 12025: 1
2007high 1 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DXQ

20in 2025

2007: 32008: 42009: 22010: 12011: 52012: 72013: 92014: 92015: 232016: 502017: 672018: 442019: 412020: 52021: 122022: 32023: 202024: 152025: 20
2007high 67 (2017) · low 1 (2010)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DXQ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—03
2008711804
200955702
20102—01
2011512115
2012410207
20132—09
2014410509
20151059023
20164217050
20172—067
20185225044
2019344041
2020320705
20214105012
2022410503
2023579020
20242—015
20253174120
202641020—

What is it indicated for?

• The Cogent™ Hemodynamic Monitoring System (HMS) is intended for patients for whom the monitoring of continuous cardiac output and calculated hemodynamic parameters is indicated for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation by a clinician. Suitability for use on a patient is up to the physician’s judgment and the diameter of the catheter to be used. • The target population includes patients for whom hemodynamic monitoring will improve clinical care. The…

Read the full statement (223 words)

• The Cogent™ Hemodynamic Monitoring System (HMS) is intended for patients for whom the monitoring of continuous cardiac output and calculated hemodynamic parameters is indicated for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation by a clinician. Suitability for use on a patient is up to the physician’s judgment and the diameter of the catheter to be used.

• The target population includes patients for whom hemodynamic monitoring will improve clinical care. The target populations are identical to those for the predicate devices and include:

o Critical Care Patients

o Trauma Patients

o Cardiac Surgery Patients

• The Cogent™ HMS is intended for use with ICU Medical pulmonary artery catheters and central venous oximetry catheters, and with ICU Medical Cogent™ sensors.

• The Cogent™ HMS is intended to measure and calculate venous oxygen saturation in patients.

• PulseCO functionality is limited to adult patients

• The intended environment for use is the hospital including Critical Care Units (such as Medical, Surgical, and Coronary), Trauma and Accident Emergency Units, Post Anesthesia Care Units, Operating Rooms, and Cardiac Catheterization labs.

• The Cogent™ HMS is intended to be used by trained and qualified individuals in medical and surgical intensive care units, operating rooms, trauma and accident emergency units, coronary and intensive care units and cardiac catheterization laboratories.

• The Cogent™ HMS is restricted to one patient at a time.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K152006: Cogent Hemodynamic Monitoring System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K152006

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026