510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2016

Ceramax Skin Barrier Cream

K152055510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 23, 2015122-day reviewClass URecalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Oculus Innovative Sciences · FRO Dressing, Wound, Drug

Cleared on Nov 23, 2015 as substantially equivalent to K052643 (Ceragenix Corporation, 2006) and 1 other predicate after a 122-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 1996. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Nov 23, 2015
Review
122 days
Class
Class U
Product code
FRO
Recalls
1
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K961758 (1996). 6 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 5 generations backK961758 Carasyn Hydrogel Wound ProductsCarrington Laboratories, Inc. · 1996
  2. 4 generations backK024367 Sinclair Wound and Skin EmulsionSinclair Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. · 2003
  3. 3 generations backK041342 Impruv a.I. Cream Wound and Skin EmulsionStiefel Laboratories, Inc. · 2005
  4. 2 generations backK052643 EpiceramCeragenix Corporation · 2006
  5. 1 generation backK110757 TL-Cermide Skin Barrier EmulsionTrigen Laboratories, Inc. · 2011
  6. This deviceK152055 Ceramax Skin Barrier CreamOculus Innovative Sciences · 2015
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−5K961758Carasyn Hydrogel Wound ProductsCarrington Laboratories, Inc.1996—
−4K024367Sinclair Wound and Skin EmulsionSinclair Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.2003—
−3K041342Impruv a.I. Cream Wound and Skin EmulsionStiefel Laboratories, Inc.2005—
−2K052643EpiceramCeragenix Corporation2006—
−1K110757TL-Cermide Skin Barrier EmulsionTrigen Laboratories, Inc.2011—
0 (this device)K152055Ceramax Skin Barrier CreamOculus Innovative Sciences2015—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199710
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K152055, 1996–2015Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FRO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new FRO device

  1. #1 K261023 Microdacyn Wound Irrigation Solutionscore 15.5 · 14 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K052643Epiceram
Summary page 4
…Common Name: Wound Dressing Classification Name: Regulation: 21 CFR Unclassified, Pre-amendment status Product Code(s) FRO Device Panel TBD Legally marketed Epiceram K052643, and TL-Cermide K110757 device(s) to which equivalence is claimed: Reason for 510(k) New Device submission Device Description C…
Ceragenix Corporation2006—
*K110757TL-Cermide Skin Barrier Emulsion
Summary page 4
…ing Classification Name: Regulation: 21 CFR Unclassified, Pre-amendment status Product Code(s) FRO Device Panel TBD Legally marketed Epiceram K052643, and TL-Cermide K110757 device(s) to which equivalence is claimed: Reason for 510(k) New Device submission Device Description Ceramax emollient formula…
Trigen Laboratories, Inc.2011—

Also cleared against K052643: 8 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Nov 21, 2016Class IIZ-0763-2017Packaging process controlFirm became aware that professional samples of Ceramax are not meeting stability standards set for the product.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 19 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.3 years on median.
  • None of the 6 ancestors has a recall.
  • 8 other devices also cite its predicate K052643.

How does its category compare?

All FRO devices

FRO Dressing, Wound, Drug: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2015, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · FRO

11in 2025

2007: 292008: 262009: 312010: 312011: 272012: 242013: 192014: 222015: 282016: 282017: 232018: 202019: 162020: 122021: 82022: 92023: 182024: 242025: 112026 (partial year): 17
2007high 31 (2009) · low 8 (2021)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FRO

176in 2025

2007: 187 days median2008: 130 days median2009: 136 days median2010: 146 days median2011: 177 days median2012: 96 days median2013: 194 days median2014: 214 days median2015: 249 days median2016: 222 days median2017: 147 days median2018: 206 days median2019: 270 days median2020: 226 days median2021: 275 days median2022: 332 days median2023: 283 days median2024: 263 days median2025: 176 days median2026 (partial year): 254 days median
2007high 332 (2022) · low 96 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · FRO

2in 2024

2007: 42008: 12009: 12011: 42013: 12014: 12015: 22016: 32017: 12019: 12021: 62022: 22023: 2, 2 Class I2024: 22026 (partial year): 2
2007high 6 (2021) · low 0 (2010)2026

Class I (2 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · FRO

192in 2025

2007: 552008: 302009: 452010: 1222011: 422012: 652013: 1392014: 2692015: 2972016: 1472017: 1492018: 1282019: 1362020: 1392021: 1832022: 1762023: 1982024: 2322025: 192
2007high 297 (2015) · low 30 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FRO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200729187455
200826130130
200931136145
2010311460122
201127177442
20122496065
2013191941139
2014222141269
2015282492297
2016282223147
2017231471149
2018202060128
2019162701136
2020122260139
202182756183
202293322176
2023182832 (2)198
2024242632232
2025111760192
2026172542—

What is it indicated for?

Under the supervision of a health care professional, Ceramax is intended to be used as a topical skin care preparation to

relieve and to manage the burning, and itching associated with various dermatoses including atopic dermatitis, irritant

contact dermatitis, radiation dermatitis and other dry skin conditions, by maintaining a moist wound and skin

environment.

Ceramax may be used to relieve dry waxy skin by maintaining a moist wound & skin environment, which is beneficial to

the healing process.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K152055: Ceramax Skin Barrier Cream.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K152055

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026