510(k) · Cleared
ClearedSurgTech Interbody System
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Surgtech, Inc. · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar
Cleared on Mar 25, 2016 as substantially equivalent to K113478 (Eisertech, LLC, 2012) and 3 other predicates after a 232-day review. Its family tree reaches back 12 generations to 2001.
- Decided
- Mar 25, 2016
- Review
- 232 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- MAX
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 4
Its longest line of descent runs back 12 generations to K003155 (2001). 59 ancestors in all, the oldest K841189 (1984). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 12 generations backK003155 Vertebral Body ReplacementOsteotech, Inc. · 2001
- 8 generations between
- 3 generations backK060762 Aesculap Peek Vertebral Body Replacement SystemAesculap, Inc. · 2006
- 2 generations backK071983 Aesculap Peek Intervertebral Body Fusion System: a Space, Cespace…Aesculap Implant Systems, Inc. · 2008 · Recalled
- 1 generation backK113478 Plif CageEisertech, LLC · 2012
- This deviceK152200 SurgTech Interbody SystemSurgtech, Inc. · 2016
Show all 12 generations
- Root · 12 generations backK003155 Vertebral Body ReplacementOsteotech, Inc. · 2001
- 11 generations backK012254 VBROsteotech, Inc. · 2001
- 10 generations backK021791 Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2002
- 9 generations backK023570 Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2002
- 8 generations backK031780 Verte-Stack Spinal SystemMedtronic Sofamor Danek · 2003
- 7 generations backK040731 Stryker Spine Vertebral SpacerStryker Spine · 2004
- 6 generations backK042571 Stryker Spine Avs TL Peek SpacerStryker Spine · 2005
- 5 generations backK050624 Stryker Spine Avs PL Peek SpacerStryker Spine · 2005
- 4 generations backK051205 Stryker Spine Avs Asl Peek SpacerStryker Spine · 2005
- 3 generations backK060762 Aesculap Peek Vertebral Body Replacement SystemAesculap, Inc. · 2006
- 2 generations backK071983 Aesculap Peek Intervertebral Body Fusion System: a Space, Cespace…Aesculap Implant Systems, Inc. · 2008 · Recalled
- 1 generation backK113478 Plif CageEisertech, LLC · 2012
- This deviceK152200 SurgTech Interbody SystemSurgtech, Inc. · 2016
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −12 | K003155 | Vertebral Body Replacement | Osteotech, Inc. | 2001 | — |
| −11 | K012254 | VBR | Osteotech, Inc. | 2001 | — |
| −10 | K021791 | Verte-Stack Spinal System | Medtronic Sofamor Danek | 2002 | — |
| −9 | K023570 | Modification to Verte-Stack Spinal System | Medtronic Sofamor Danek | 2002 | — |
| −8 | K031780 | Verte-Stack Spinal System | Medtronic Sofamor Danek | 2003 | — |
| −7 | K040731 | Stryker Spine Vertebral Spacer | Stryker Spine | 2004 | — |
| −6 | K042571 | Stryker Spine Avs TL Peek Spacer | Stryker Spine | 2005 | — |
| −5 | K050624 | Stryker Spine Avs PL Peek Spacer | Stryker Spine | 2005 | — |
| −4 | K051205 | Stryker Spine Avs Asl Peek Spacer | Stryker Spine | 2005 | — |
| −3 | K060762 | Aesculap Peek Vertebral Body Replacement System | Aesculap, Inc. | 2006 | — |
| −2 | K071983 | Aesculap Peek Intervertebral Body Fusion System: a Space, Cespace, Prospace… | Aesculap Implant Systems, Inc. | 2008 | 1 |
| −1 | K113478 | Plif Cage | Eisertech, LLC | 2012 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K152200 | SurgTech Interbody System | Surgtech, Inc. | 2016 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1984 | 1 | 0 |
| 1996 | 2 | 0 |
| 1999 | 3 | 0 |
| 2000 | 1 | 0 |
| 2001 | 6 | 0 |
| 2002 | 4 | 0 |
| 2003 | 5 | 0 |
| 2004 | 9 | 0 |
| 2005 | 4 | 0 |
| 2007 | 7 | 0 |
| 2008 | 4 | 0 |
| 2009 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device
- #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (4)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K113478 | Plif CageSummary page 4…T1 (polyetheretherketone) per ASTM F2026 and contain tantalum radiopaque markers per ASTM F560. Primary Predicate: PLIF Cage (Eisertech LLC, K113478) Additional Predicate: AVS® PL PEEK Spacers (Stryker Spine – K073470, K082014 & K093704) Performance Data: Mechanical tes… | 2012 |
| * | K073470 | Avs PL Peek Spacers, Models 48351XXX and 48353XXXSummary page 4…radiopaque markers per ASTM F560. Primary Predicate: PLIF Cage (Eisertech LLC, K113478) Additional Predicate: AVS® PL PEEK Spacers (Stryker Spine – K073470, K082014 & K093704) Performance Data: Mechanical testing of the worst case SurgTech Interbody System device… | 2008 |
| * | K082014 | Stryker Spine Avs PL Peek SpacersSummary page 4…radiopaque markers per ASTM F560. Primary Predicate: PLIF Cage (Eisertech LLC, K113478) Additional Predicate: AVS® PL PEEK Spacers (Stryker Spine – K073470, K082014 & K093704) Performance Data: Mechanical testing of the worst case SurgTech Interbody System device… | 2008 |
| * | K093704 | Avs PL Peek SpacersSummary page 4…opaque markers per ASTM F560. Primary Predicate: PLIF Cage (Eisertech LLC, K113478) Additional Predicate: AVS® PL PEEK Spacers (Stryker Spine – K073470, K082014 & K093704) Performance Data: Mechanical testing of the worst case SurgTech Interbody System device was perfor… | 2009 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 15 years and passes through 7 companies; a new generation was cleared every 10 months on median.
- 7 of the 59 ancestors have a recall of any class.
- 7 other devices also cite its predicate K113478.
How does its category compare?
All MAX devicesMAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2016, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · MAX
29in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · MAX
85in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · MAX
5in 2025
Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · MAX
811in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 7 | 86 | 0 | 12 |
| 2008 | 35 | 88 | 2 | 19 |
| 2009 | 31 | 102 | 9 | 90 |
| 2010 | 29 | 137 | 0 | 154 |
| 2011 | 49 | 98 | 3 | 201 |
| 2012 | 48 | 69 | 11 (1) | 327 |
| 2013 | 58 | 102 | 0 | 380 |
| 2014 | 58 | 115 | 3 | 366 |
| 2015 | 53 | 113 | 1 | 524 |
| 2016 | 64 | 124 | 6 | 647 |
| 2017 | 76 | 116 | 1 | 596 |
| 2018 | 64 | 114 | 4 | 616 |
| 2019 | 60 | 131 | 1 | 699 |
| 2020 | 56 | 106 | 0 | 640 |
| 2021 | 53 | 109 | 0 | 622 |
| 2022 | 41 | 95 | 1 | 618 |
| 2023 | 30 | 87 | 0 | 576 |
| 2024 | 38 | 91 | 1 | 729 |
| 2025 | 29 | 85 | 5 | 811 |
| 2026 | 18 | 95 | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The SurgTech Interbody System is indicated for use with autogenous bone graft in skeletally mature patients with
degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1. DDD is defined as discogenic back pain
with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should have had six months of
non-operative treatment. These patients may have had a previous non-fusion spinal surgery and may also have up to
Grade 1 spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved spinal level(s). These devices are intended to be used with
supplemental fixation which has been cleared for use in the lumbar spine.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K152200 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K152200: SurgTech Interbody System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K152200
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026