510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

iLab Ultrasound Imaging System

K152316510(k) SpecialCleared Sep 18, 201532-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1560

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Boston Scientific · IYO System, Imaging, Pulsed Echo, Ultrasonic

Cleared on Sep 18, 2015 as substantially equivalent to K130243 (Boston Scientific Corp, 2013) after a 32-day review. Its family tree reaches back 6 generations to 1992. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Sep 18, 2015
Review
32 days
Class
Class II
Product code
IYO
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 6 generations to K921750 (1992). 8 ancestors in all. 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

  1. Root · 6 generations backK921750 Cvis Insight Iii SystemCardiovascular Imaging Systems, Inc. · 1992
  2. 5 generations backK980851 Galaxy Intravascular Ultrasound System, Model I5028Boston Scientific Corp · 1998
  3. 4 generations backK051679 Ilab Ultrasound Imaging SystemBoston Scientific Corp · 2005 · Recalled
  4. 3 generations backK072517 Ilab Ultrasound Imaging System, Version 1.3Boston Scientific Corp · 2007 · Recalled
  5. 2 generations backK123535 Ilab Ultrasound Imaging SystemBoston Scientific Corp · 2013
  6. 1 generation backK130243 Ilab Ultrasound Imaging SystemBoston Scientific Corp · 2013
  7. This deviceK152316 iLab Ultrasound Imaging SystemBoston Scientific · 2015
  8. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK250684 OPUSWAVE Dual Sensor Imaging SystemTerumo Cardiovascular Systems Thi Plant · 2025

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K250684OPUSWAVE Dual Sensor Imaging SystemTerumo Cardiovascular Systems Thi Plant · 2025 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−6K921750Cvis Insight Iii SystemCardiovascular Imaging Systems, Inc.1992—
−5K980851Galaxy Intravascular Ultrasound System, Model I5028Boston Scientific Corp1998—
−4K051679Ilab Ultrasound Imaging SystemBoston Scientific Corp20052
−3K072517Ilab Ultrasound Imaging System, Version 1.3Boston Scientific Corp20071
−2K123535Ilab Ultrasound Imaging SystemBoston Scientific Corp2013—
−1K130243Ilab Ultrasound Imaging SystemBoston Scientific Corp2013—
0 (this device)K152316iLab Ultrasound Imaging SystemBoston Scientific2015—
+1K250684OPUSWAVE Dual Sensor Imaging SystemTerumo Cardiovascular Systems Thi Plant2025—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199320

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K152316, 1992–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in IYO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new IYO device

  1. #1 K243937 Accuro 3Sscore 20.5 · 18 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K130243Ilab Ultrasound Imaging System
Summary page 5
…ate Device: iLab™ Ultrasound Imaging System Product 510(k) Clearance Date iLab Ultrasound Imaging K130243 March 1, 2013 System ___________________________________________________________________________ Description of t…
Boston Scientific Corp2013—

Also cleared against K130243: 3 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K250684OPUSWAVE Dual Sensor Imaging SystemTerumo Cardiovascular Systems Thi Plant20250

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 23 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 5.3 years on median.
  • 2 of the 8 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K250684 (Terumo Cardiovascular Systems Thi Plant, 2025) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K130243.

How does its category compare?

All IYO devices

IYO System, Imaging, Pulsed Echo, Ultrasonic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2015, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · IYO

7in 2025

2007: 202008: 142009: 132010: 152011: 112012: 152013: 172014: 142015: 192016: 102017: 192018: 142019: 132020: 112021: 152022: 52023: 112024: 102025: 72026 (partial year): 10
2007high 20 (2007) · low 5 (2022)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · IYO

171in 2025

2007: 17 days median2008: 36 days median2009: 79 days median2010: 113 days median2011: 69 days median2012: 68 days median2013: 50 days median2014: 63 days median2015: 46 days median2016: 36 days median2017: 72 days median2018: 56 days median2019: 59 days median2020: 57 days median2021: 64 days median2022: 190 days median2023: 177 days median2024: 220 days median2025: 171 days median2026 (partial year): 139 days median
2007high 220 (2024) · low 17 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · IYO

1in 2022

2007: 42008: 52009: 92010: 82012: 22013: 32014: 22015: 12018: 12019: 12021: 112022: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 11 (2021) · low 0 (2011)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · IYO

485in 2025

2007: 392008: 202009: 272010: 202011: 582012: 782013: 4362014: 3042015: 2682016: 2542017: 2382018: 3682019: 5372020: 4982021: 6172022: 5112023: 5272024: 6402025: 485
2007high 640 (2024) · low 20 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code IYO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072017439
20081436520
20091379927
201015113820
20111169058
20121568278
201317503436
201414632304
201519461268
201610360254
201719720238
201814561368
201913591537
202011570498
2021156411617
202251901511
2023111770527
2024102200640
202571710485
2026101391—

What is it indicated for?

The iLab Ultrasound Imaging System is intended for ultrasound examinations of intravascular pathology. Intravascular ultrasound is indicated for patients who are are candidates for transluminal interventional procedures such as angioplasty and atherectomy.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K152316: iLab Ultrasound Imaging System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K152316

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026