510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Sterling 5W Diode Laser

K160413510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 21, 2016218-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4810

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

CAO Group, Inc. · GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument

Cleared on Sep 21, 2016 as substantially equivalent to K050453 (Ivoclar Vivadent, Inc., 2005) after a 218-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 2001.

Decided
Sep 21, 2016
Review
218 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GEX
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K011041 (2001). 6 ancestors in all, the oldest K993285 (1999). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2001: 1 other ancestor2000: 1 other ancestor1999: 1 other ancestorK011041 · Waterlase, Millennium · Biolase Technology, Inc. · 2001K030539 · Lasersmile · Biolase Technology, Inc. · 2003K050453 · Odyssey 2.4G, Denlaser Elite, Model 002-00050 · Ivoclar Vivadent, Inc. · 200519952000200520102015
  1. Root · 3 generations backK011041 Waterlase, MillenniumBiolase Technology, Inc. · 2001
  2. 2 generations backK030539 LasersmileBiolase Technology, Inc. · 2003
  3. 1 generation backK050453 Odyssey 2.4G, Denlaser Elite, Model 002-00050Ivoclar Vivadent, Inc. · 2005
  4. This deviceK160413 Sterling 5W Diode LaserCAO Group, Inc. · 2016
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K011041Waterlase, MillenniumBiolase Technology, Inc.2001—
−2K030539LasersmileBiolase Technology, Inc.2003—
−1K050453Odyssey 2.4G, Denlaser Elite, Model 002-00050Ivoclar Vivadent, Inc.2005—
0 (this device)K160413Sterling 5W Diode LaserCAO Group, Inc.2016—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199910
200010
200110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K160413, 2001–2016Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GEX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GEX device

  1. #1 K222064 The Alma Soprano Titaniumscore 38.1 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K050453Odyssey 2.4G, Denlaser Elite, Model 002-00050
Summary page 4
…Class II Legally Marketed Predicate Devices for Substantial Equivalence: Odyssey 2.4G Diode Laser, manufactured for Ivoclar Vivadent, Inc. (K050453) Rationale for Substantial Equivalence: The submitted device and identified predicate device share exactly identical indication…
Ivoclar Vivadent, Inc.2005—

Also cleared against K050453: 8 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 15 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.3 years on median.
  • 1 of the 6 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 8 other devices also cite its predicate K050453.

How does its category compare?

All GEX devices

GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2016, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · GEX

83in 2025

2007: 732008: 1072009: 692010: 502011: 412012: 452013: 462014: 612015: 472016: 512017: 672018: 512019: 412020: 522021: 532022: 602023: 522024: 822025: 832026 (partial year): 57
2007high 107 (2008) · low 41 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GEX

90in 2025

2007: 79 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 100 days median2010: 96 days median2011: 83 days median2012: 118 days median2013: 144 days median2014: 147 days median2015: 112 days median2016: 114 days median2017: 90 days median2018: 78 days median2019: 88 days median2020: 90 days median2021: 123 days median2022: 152 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 90 days median2025: 90 days median2026 (partial year): 90 days median
2007high 152 (2022) · low 78 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GEX

3in 2024

2007: 92008: 22010: 42011: 182012: 52013: 32014: 62016: 12017: 5, 1 Class I2018: 52019: 62020: 12023: 62024: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 18 (2011) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GEX

2,720in 2025

2007: 3422008: 2322009: 2092010: 1,7112011: 3,0242012: 2,0002013: 2,2362014: 2,0362015: 2,0992016: 2,5852017: 2,9772018: 3,5252019: 2,7092020: 2,1832021: 3,4652022: 2,2882023: 2,3372024: 2,1872025: 2,720
2007high 3,525 (2018) · low 209 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GEX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200773799342
2008107862232
2009691000209
2010509641,711
20114183183,024
20124511852,000
20134614432,236
20146114762,036
20154711202,099
20165111412,585
201767905 (1)2,977
2018517853,525
2019418862,709
2020529012,183
20215312303,465
20226015202,288
2023528762,337
2024829032,187
2025839002,720
202657902—

What is it indicated for?

The Sterling Diode Laser is indicated for: Dental soft tissue indications: Dental, oral and soft tissue surgery including: Sulcular debridement of diseased or fibrous tissue, excision and biopsy, gingivectomy and gingivoplasty, lesion (tumor) removal, fibroma removal, tissue retraction (troughing), aphthous ulcers, gingival hyperplasia (excision and recontour), crown lengthening, operculectomy, frenectomy, and photocoagulation. Laser periodontal…

Read the full statement (90 words)

The Sterling Diode Laser is indicated for:

Dental soft tissue indications:

Dental, oral and soft tissue surgery including:

Sulcular debridement of diseased or fibrous tissue, excision and biopsy, gingivectomy and gingivoplasty, lesion (tumor) removal, fibroma removal, tissue retraction (troughing), aphthous ulcers, gingival hyperplasia (excision and recontour), crown lengthening, operculectomy, frenectomy, and photocoagulation.

Laser periodontal procedures, including:

Laser soft tissue curettage; laser removal of diseased, infected and necrosed soft tissue within the periodontal pocket; removal of highly inflamed edematous tissue affected by bacteria penetration of the pocket lining and junctional epithelium.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K160413: Sterling 5W Diode Laser.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K160413

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026