510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2024

Biodesign Tissue Graft, Biodesign Dural Graft, Biodesign Peyronie's Repair Graft

K160869510(k) SpecialCleared Apr 29, 201630-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.3300Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Cook Biotech Incorporated · FTM Mesh, Surgical

Cleared on Apr 29, 2016 as substantially equivalent to K980431 (Cook Biotech, Inc., 1998) and 2 other predicates after a 30-day review. Its family tree reaches back 11 generations to 1993. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Apr 29, 2016
Review
30 days
Class
Class II
Product code
FTM
Recalls
1
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 11 generations to K931386 (1993). 48 ancestors in all, the oldest K830889 (1983). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 11 generations backK931386 Hemashield Microvel/Woven Double Velour FabricMeadox Medicals, Div. Boston Scientific Corp. · 1993
  2. 7 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK040623 Ams Perigee SystemAmerican Medical Systems, Inc. · 2004
  4. 2 generations backK050445 Ams Collagen Dermal MatrixAmerican Medical Systems, Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  5. 1 generation backK062320 Surgisis Peyronie's Repair Graft, Model SPR-100Cook Biotech, Inc. · 2006
  6. This deviceK160869 Biodesign Tissue Graft, Biodesign Dural Graft, Biodesign Peyronie's…Cook Biotech Incorporated · 2016
Show all 11 generations
  1. Root · 11 generations backK931386 Hemashield Microvel/Woven Double Velour FabricMeadox Medicals, Div. Boston Scientific Corp. · 1993
  2. 10 generations backK963611 Vascutek Cardiovascular Fabric: Vascutek Gelseal Patch,Vascutek…Vascutek, Ltd. · 1996 · Recalled
  3. 9 generations backK972651 IN-SlingInfluence, Inc. · 1997
  4. 8 generations backK980482 Triangle SlingInfluence, Inc. · 1998
  5. 7 generations backK002721 Ams Triangle Silicone-Coated Sling and Surgical MeshAmerican Medical Systems, Inc. · 2000
  6. 6 generations backK010931 Ams Sacral Colpopexy Sling, Model 72403501American Medical Systems, Inc. · 2001
  7. 5 generations backK033636 Ams Large Pore Polypropylene MeshAmerican Medical Systems, Inc. · 2003
  8. 4 generations backK040521 Modification to Ams Large Pore Polypropylene MeshAmerican Medical Systems, Inc. · 2004
  9. 3 generations backK040623 Ams Perigee SystemAmerican Medical Systems, Inc. · 2004
  10. 2 generations backK050445 Ams Collagen Dermal MatrixAmerican Medical Systems, Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  11. 1 generation backK062320 Surgisis Peyronie's Repair Graft, Model SPR-100Cook Biotech, Inc. · 2006
  12. This deviceK160869 Biodesign Tissue Graft, Biodesign Dural Graft, Biodesign Peyronie's…Cook Biotech Incorporated · 2016
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−11K931386Hemashield Microvel/Woven Double Velour FabricMeadox Medicals, Div. Boston Scientific Corp.1993—
−10K963611Vascutek Cardiovascular Fabric: Vascutek Gelseal Patch,Vascutek Gelsoft…Vascutek, Ltd.19961
−9K972651IN-SlingInfluence, Inc.1997—
−8K980482Triangle SlingInfluence, Inc.1998—
−7K002721Ams Triangle Silicone-Coated Sling and Surgical MeshAmerican Medical Systems, Inc.2000—
−6K010931Ams Sacral Colpopexy Sling, Model 72403501American Medical Systems, Inc.2001—
−5K033636Ams Large Pore Polypropylene MeshAmerican Medical Systems, Inc.2003—
−4K040521Modification to Ams Large Pore Polypropylene MeshAmerican Medical Systems, Inc.2004—
−3K040623Ams Perigee SystemAmerican Medical Systems, Inc.2004—
−2K050445Ams Collagen Dermal MatrixAmerican Medical Systems, Inc.20051
−1K062320Surgisis Peyronie's Repair Graft, Model SPR-100Cook Biotech, Inc.2006—
0 (this device)K160869Biodesign Tissue Graft, Biodesign Dural Graft, Biodesign Peyronie's Repair GraftCook Biotech Incorporated2016—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198310
199240
199520
199650
199730
199830
199930
200030
200130
200250
200320
200430
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K160869, 1993–2016Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FTM? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new FTM device

  1. #1 K262406 EluPro Antibiotic-Eluting BioEnvelopescore 15.1 · 12 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K980431Surgisis
Summary page 6
…Surgisis Peyronie’s Substitute Device (K980431) Repair Graft (K062320) (K031850)…
Cook Biotech, Inc.1998—
*K031850Durasis Dural Substitute
Summary page 6
…Substitute Device (K980431) Repair Graft (K062320) (K031850) intended for implantation…
Cook Biotech, Inc.2003—
*K062320Surgisis Peyronie's Repair Graft, Model SPR-100
Summary page 6
…s Peyronie’s Substitute Device (K980431) Repair Graft (K062320) (K031850)…
Cook Biotech, Inc.2006—

Also cleared against K980431: 28 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Nov 22, 2024Class IIZ-0834-2025Under Investigation by firmIncorrect version of IFU was used rather than updated version; and incorrect expiration date was used on two of the products.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 23 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.1 years on median.
  • 5 of the 48 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 28 other devices also cite its predicate K980431.

How does its category compare?

All FTM devices

FTM Mesh, Surgical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2016, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · FTM

1in 2025

2007: 92008: 92009: 72010: 22011: 62012: 42013: 42014: 82015: 42016: 72017: 92018: 22019: 62020: 42021: 42023: 22024: 32025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 9 (2007) · low 0 (2022)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FTM

29in 2024

2007: 104 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 86 days median2011: 100 days median2012: 66 days median2013: 123 days median2014: 153 days median2015: 316 days median2016: 88 days median2017: 147 days median2019: 107 days median2020: 59 days median2021: 61 days median2024: 29 days median
2007high 316 (2015) · low 29 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · FTM

1in 2023

2007: 72008: 12010: 12011: 82018: 212019: 42020: 12021: 12023: 1
2007high 21 (2018) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · FTM

232in 2025

2007: 602008: 1412009: 4762010: 1972011: 2882012: 4672013: 3,3512014: 1,0932015: 9772016: 5092017: 5292018: 3572019: 4182020: 4572021: 3692022: 3752023: 4852024: 3832025: 232
2007high 3,351 (2013) · low 60 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FTM, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20079104760
20089861141
20097860476
20102—1197
201161008288
20124660467
2013412303,351
2014815301,093
201543160977
20167880509
201791470529
20182—21357
201961074418
20204591457
20214611369
20220—0375
20232—1485
20243290383
20251—0232
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

Biodesign Tissue Graft is intended to be used for implantation to reinforce soft tissue

Biodesign Dural Graft is intended for use as a dura substitute for the repair of dura mater.

Biodesign Peyronie's Repair Graft is intended for implantation to reinforce soft tissue where weakness exists in the urological anatomy, including but not limited to the repair of tunica albuginea defects, and reinforcement in the repair of Peyronie’s disease.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K160869: Biodesign Tissue Graft, Biodesign Dural Graft, Biodesign Peyronie's Repair Graft.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K160869

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026