510(k) · Cleared
ClearedFlexStim Neurostimulation Electrodes Model Numbers: 5050ROC1S, 5050ROC1W, 5050ROC2S, 5050ROC2W, 5050SQC1S, 5050SQC1W, 5050SQC2S, 5050SQC2W
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Medico Electrodes International, Ltd. · GXY Electrode, Cutaneous
Cleared on Oct 30, 2016 as substantially equivalent to K142099 (Bio Protech, Inc., 2014) and 1 other predicate after a 177-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2011.
- Decided
- Oct 30, 2016
- Review
- 177 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- GXY
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 2
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K111270 (2011). 2 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 1 generation backK111270 Reusable Stimulating ElectrodesBio Protech, Inc. · 2011
- This deviceK161282 FlexStim Neurostimulation Electrodes Model Numbers: 5050ROC1S…Medico Electrodes International, Ltd. · 2016
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | K111270 | Reusable Stimulating Electrodes | Bio Protech, Inc. | 2011 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K161282 | FlexStim Neurostimulation Electrodes Model Numbers: 5050ROC1S, 5050ROC1W… | Medico Electrodes International, Ltd. | 2016 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in GXY? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new GXY device
- #1 K232052 Ceribell Instant EEG Headbandscore 16.3 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (2)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K142099 | Cutaneous ElectrodesSummary page 4…trodes Classification Name: Cutaneous electrode (21 CFR 882.1320) Regulatory Class: II Product Code: GXY III. PREDICATE DEVICE PROTENS Reusable Stimulating Electrodes, K142099 (Predicate Device 1) Reusable Stimulating Electrodes, K111270 (Predicate Device 2) These predicate devices had not been subject… | 2014 |
| * | K111270 | Reusable Stimulating ElectrodesSummary page 4…20) Regulatory Class: II Product Code: GXY III. PREDICATE DEVICE PROTENS Reusable Stimulating Electrodes, K142099 (Predicate Device 1) Reusable Stimulating Electrodes, K111270 (Predicate Device 2) These predicate devices had not been subject to a design-related recall. No reference devices were used in… | 2011 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
How does its category compare?
All GXY devicesGXY Electrode, Cutaneous: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2016, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · GXY
6in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · GXY
148in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · GXY
2in 2023
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · GXY
58in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code GXY, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 7 | 88 | 0 | 14 |
| 2008 | 9 | 136 | 0 | 17 |
| 2009 | 17 | 159 | 4 | 15 |
| 2010 | 3 | 137 | 1 | 14 |
| 2011 | 6 | 183 | 5 | 16 |
| 2012 | 9 | 150 | 4 | 16 |
| 2013 | 7 | 99 | 0 | 15 |
| 2014 | 9 | 203 | 0 | 11 |
| 2015 | 6 | 119 | 0 | 19 |
| 2016 | 6 | 170 | 0 | 15 |
| 2017 | 9 | 116 | 0 | 11 |
| 2018 | 14 | 135 | 0 | 10 |
| 2019 | 9 | 113 | 0 | 19 |
| 2020 | 4 | 108 | 0 | 11 |
| 2021 | 12 | 195 | 0 | 21 |
| 2022 | 5 | 81 | 0 | 34 |
| 2023 | 13 | 132 | 2 | 25 |
| 2024 | 7 | 111 | 0 | 51 |
| 2025 | 6 | 148 | 0 | 58 |
| 2026 | 12 | 70 | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
Reusable, self-adhering neurostimulation electrodes are indicated for use with transcutaneous electrical stimulation devices. Some common types of transcutaneous stimulation devices include, but are not limited to, transepithelial nerve stimulation (TENS) and electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) devices. Transcutaneous neurostimulation electrodes are passive devices serving as an interface between a user's skin and a neurostimulation device.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K161282 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K161282: FlexStim Neurostimulation Electrodes Model Numbers: 5050ROC1S, 5050ROC1W, 5050ROC2S, 5050ROC2W, 5050SQC1S, 5050SQC1W, 5050SQC2S, 5050SQC2W.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K161282
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026