510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Eyenez Ophthalmic Camera

K161727510(k) TraditionalCleared Oct 4, 2016104-day reviewClass II21 CFR 886.1120

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Eyenez, LLC · HKI Camera, Ophthalmic, Ac-Powered

Cleared on Oct 4, 2016 as substantially equivalent to K110986 (Optomed OY, 2011) after a 104-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 2001.

Decided
Oct 4, 2016
Review
104 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HKI
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K003376 (2001). 4 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 3 generations backK003376 Welch Allyn 11800 OpthalmoscopeWelch Allyn, Inc. · 2001
  2. 2 generations backK092056 Optomed Smartscope, Model M3-1 EY1Optomed OY · 2009
  3. 1 generation backK110986 Optomed Smartscope M5 EY3 and M5 ES1Optomed OY · 2011
  4. This deviceK161727 Eyenez Ophthalmic CameraEyenez, LLC · 2016
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K003376Welch Allyn 11800 OpthalmoscopeWelch Allyn, Inc.2001—
−2K092056Optomed Smartscope, Model M3-1 EY1Optomed OY2009—
−1K110986Optomed Smartscope M5 EY3 and M5 ES1Optomed OY2011—
0 (this device)K161727Eyenez Ophthalmic CameraEyenez, LLC2016—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K161727, 2001–2016Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HKI? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HKI device

  1. #1 K253176 TearViewscore 12.7 · 5 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K110986Optomed Smartscope M5 EY3 and M5 ES1
Summary page 4
…(21 CFR 886.1120, Product Code HKI) Predicate Device Identification: Optomed Smartscope M5 EY3 and M5 ES1 (K110986)- (aka. Volk Pictor Ret1) Device Description: The Eyenez Ophthalmic Camera is a handheld ophthalmic camera that combines a cond…
Optomed OY2011—

Also cleared against K110986: 3 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 15 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 5.4 years on median.
  • None of the 4 ancestors has a recall.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K110986.

How does its category compare?

All HKI devices

HKI Camera, Ophthalmic, Ac-Powered: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2016, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · HKI

4in 2025

2007: 22008: 52009: 112010: 62011: 72012: 52013: 72014: 42016: 42017: 22018: 62019: 42020: 52021: 42022: 12023: 52024: 32025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 11 (2009) · low 0 (2015)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HKI

167in 2025

2008: 29 days median2009: 104 days median2010: 140 days median2011: 160 days median2012: 179 days median2013: 141 days median2014: 135 days median2016: 146 days median2018: 71 days median2019: 73 days median2020: 182 days median2021: 155 days median2023: 259 days median2024: 28 days median2025: 167 days median
2007high 259 (2023) · low 28 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HKI

1in 2018

2012: 12016: 12017: 12018: 1
2007high 1 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HKI

1in 2023

2007: 32008: 12009: 12012: 22013: 222014: 32015: 32016: 662017: 202018: 142020: 52021: 32022: 12023: 1
2007high 66 (2016) · low 0 (2010)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HKI, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—03
200852901
20091110401
2010614000
2011716000
2012517912
20137141022
2014413503
20150—03
20164146166
20172—120
2018671114
201947300
2020518205
2021415503
20221—01
2023525901
202432800
2025416700
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Eyenez V200 fundus camera is intended to be used to capture images of the retina of the eye.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K161727: Eyenez Ophthalmic Camera.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K161727

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026