510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Pacel Flow Directed Pacing Catheter

K161873510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 22, 2016138-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.3680

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

St Jude Medical · LDF Electrode, Pacemaker, Temporary

Cleared on Nov 22, 2016 as substantially equivalent to K914185 (Daig Corp., 1992) after a 138-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1992. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Nov 22, 2016
Review
138 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LDF
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K914185 (1992). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2025: 1 descendant clearedK914185 · Pacel (TM) Flow Directed Pacing Catheter · Daig Corp. · 19921990200020102020
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K914185 · Pacel (TM) Flow Directed Pacing Catheter · Daig Corp. · 19920
  1. Root · 1 generation backK914185 Pacel (TM) Flow Directed Pacing CatheterDaig Corp. · 1992
  2. This deviceK161873 Pacel Flow Directed Pacing CatheterSt Jude Medical · 2016
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK242863 Bioptimal Bipolar Pacing CatheterBioptimal International Pte., Ltd. · 2025

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K242863Bioptimal Bipolar Pacing CatheterBioptimal International Pte., Ltd. · 2025 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K914185Pacel (TM) Flow Directed Pacing CatheterDaig Corp.1992—
0 (this device)K161873Pacel Flow Directed Pacing CatheterSt Jude Medical2016—
+1K242863Bioptimal Bipolar Pacing CatheterBioptimal International Pte., Ltd.2025—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K161873, 1992–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LDF? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LDF device

  1. #1 K241334 Semi-Floating Temporary Pacing Electrode…score 12.1 · 2 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K914185Pacel (TM) Flow Directed Pacing Catheter
Summary page 4
…21CFR § 870.3680 – Cardiovascular permanent or temporary pacemaker electrode Predicate Device: Pacel™ Flow Directed Pacing Catheters (K914185) Page 1 of 4 Pacel Pacing Ca…
Daig Corp.1992—

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K242863Bioptimal Bipolar Pacing CatheterBioptimal International Pte., Ltd.20250

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K242863 (Bioptimal International Pte., Ltd., 2025) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All LDF devices

LDF Electrode, Pacemaker, Temporary: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2016, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LDF

5in 2025

2008: 12014: 12015: 22016: 32017: 12018: 12019: 12024: 12025: 52026 (partial year): 1
2007high 5 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LDF

266in 2025

2016: 138 days median2025: 266 days median
2007high 266 (2025) · low 138 (2016)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LDF

1in 2018

2008: 22009: 22011: 12012: 12018: 1, 1 Class I2026 (partial year): 1, 1 Class I
2007high 2 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (2 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LDF

139in 2025

2007: 252008: 182009: 442010: 482011: 352012: 682013: 742014: 682015: 812016: 902017: 792018: 912019: 1302020: 832021: 1252022: 1172023: 2122024: 1902025: 139
2007high 212 (2023) · low 18 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LDF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—025
20081—218
20090—244
20100—048
20110—135
20120—168
20130—074
20141—068
20152—081
20163138090
20171—079
20181—1 (1)91
20191—0130
20200—083
20210—0125
20220—0117
20230—0212
20241—0190
202552660139
20261—1 (1)—

What is it indicated for?

Pacel™ Flow Directed Pacing Catheters are indicated for use in temporary, transvenous, right ventricular pacing.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K161873: Pacel Flow Directed Pacing Catheter.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K161873

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026