510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Cryotec

K162051510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 14, 2016142-day reviewClass II21 CFR 884.6160

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Reprolife, Inc. · MQK Labware, Assisted Reproduction

Cleared on Dec 14, 2016 as substantially equivalent to K153027 (Kitazato Biopharma Co., Ltd., 2016) after a 142-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 2004.

Decided
Dec 14, 2016
Review
142 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MQK
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K041562 (2004). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 4 generations backK041562 CryotipIrvine Scientific Sales Co., Inc. · 2004
  2. 3 generations backK090832 Rapid-IVitrolife Sweden AB · 2009
  3. 2 generations backK122982 CryolockBiotech, Inc. · 2014
  4. 1 generation backK153027 Cryotop USKitazato Biopharma Co., Ltd. · 2016
  5. This deviceK162051 CryotecReprolife, Inc. · 2016
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K041562CryotipIrvine Scientific Sales Co., Inc.2004—
−3K090832Rapid-IVitrolife Sweden AB2009—
−2K122982CryolockBiotech, Inc.2014—
−1K153027Cryotop USKitazato Biopharma Co., Ltd.2016—
0 (this device)K162051CryotecReprolife, Inc.2016—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K162051, 2004–2016Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MQK? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MQK device

  1. #1 K241626 SperSort™ Sperm Sorting Chip (IPG02)score 10.1 · 5 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K153027Cryotop US
Summary page 4
…ion) Device Class: Class II Classification Panel: Obstetrics and Gynecology 5. Legally Marketed Predicate Device(s) Kitazato, CryotopUS, K153027. The predicate device has not been subject to a design-related recall. 6. Device Description Cryotec is a cryopreservation s…
Kitazato Biopharma Co., Ltd.2016—

Also cleared against K153027: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 12 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 4.0 years on median.
  • None of the 4 ancestors has a recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K153027.

How does its category compare?

All MQK devices

MQK Labware, Assisted Reproduction: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2016, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MQK

3in 2025

2007: 12008: 22009: 22010: 22011: 12012: 32013: 12014: 62015: 22016: 22017: 22018: 42019: 12020: 22021: 12022: 22024: 42025: 32026 (partial year): 1
2007high 6 (2014) · low 0 (2023)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MQK

259in 2025

2012: 454 days median2014: 270 days median2018: 154 days median2024: 163 days median2025: 259 days median
2007high 454 (2012) · low 154 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MQK

1in 2011

2007: 12011: 1
2007high 1 (2007) · low 0 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MQK

1in 2025

2025: 1
2007high 1 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MQK, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—10
20082—00
20092—00
20102—00
20111—10
2012345400
20131—00
2014627000
20152—00
20162—00
20172—00
2018415400
20191—00
20202—00
20211—00
20222—00
20230—00
2024416300
2025325901
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

This device is a vitrification storage device that is intended for use in vitrification procedures to contain and maintain human 4-8 cell or blastocyst stage embryos.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K162051: Cryotec.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K162051

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026