510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2021

Kwart Retro-Inject Ureteral Stent

K162109510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 7, 2017313-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.4620Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Cook Incorporated · FAD Stent, Ureteral

Cleared on Jun 7, 2017 as substantially equivalent to K010002 (Boston Scientific Corp, 2001) and 1 other predicate after a 313-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1994. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Jun 7, 2017
Review
313 days
Class
Class II
Product code
FAD
Recalls
1
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K924608 (1994). 2 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2001: 1 other ancestorK924608 · Hydrogel Coated Percuflex (R) Drainage Catheters · Boston Scientific Corp · 1994199019952000200520102015
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor K924608 · Hydrogel Coated Percuflex (R) Drainage Catheters · Boston Scientific Corp · 19940
  1. Root · 1 generation backK924608 Hydrogel Coated Percuflex (R) Drainage CathetersBoston Scientific Corp · 1994
  2. This deviceK162109 Kwart Retro-Inject Ureteral StentCook Incorporated · 2017
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K924608Hydrogel Coated Percuflex (R) Drainage CathetersBoston Scientific Corp1994—
0 (this device)K162109Kwart Retro-Inject Ureteral StentCook Incorporated2017—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K162109, 1994–2017Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FAD? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new FAD device

  1. #1 K251890 Disposable Ureteral Stentsscore 12.4 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K010002Contour Polaris Ureteral Stent
Summary page 4
…Class II, Gastroenterology/Urology Predicate Device: The primary predicate device is the Contour™ and Contour VL™ Injection Ureteral Stent Set cleared under 510(k) K010002. The secondary predicate device is the Boston Scientific Hydrogel Coated Percuflex Drainage Catheter cleared under K924608. Devi…
Boston Scientific Corp20011
*K924608Hydrogel Coated Percuflex (R) Drainage Catheters
Summary page 4
…ection Ureteral Stent Set cleared under 510(k) K010002. The secondary predicate device is the Boston Scientific Hydrogel Coated Percuflex Drainage Catheter cleared under K924608. Device Description: The Kwart Retro-Inject™ Stent Set is intended to be marketed as a set with multiple components. The set is…
Boston Scientific Corp1994—

Also cleared against K010002: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jan 4, 2021Class IIZ-0960-2021Nonconforming Material/ComponentManufactured with incorrect material, which may result in the stent being stiffer and potentially susceptible to degradation could potentially lead to breakage/fragmentation.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • 1 of the 2 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K010002.

How does its category compare?

All FAD devices

FAD Stent, Ureteral: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2017, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · FAD

4in 2025

2007: 12008: 12010: 12014: 12016: 42017: 82018: 92019: 52020: 12021: 22022: 52024: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 1
2007high 9 (2018) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FAD

186in 2025

2016: 143 days median2017: 266 days median2018: 258 days median2019: 263 days median2022: 143 days median2025: 186 days median
2007high 266 (2017) · low 143 (2016)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · FAD

4in 2025

2007: 12008: 222009: 22010: 12016: 42019: 62020: 22021: 12022: 92025: 4
2007high 22 (2008) · low 0 (2011)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · FAD

634in 2025

2007: 432008: 762009: 1232010: 782011: 952012: 1312013: 822014: 782015: 1302016: 1822017: 2652018: 2772019: 2612020: 3522021: 5312022: 5592023: 6912024: 6032025: 634
2007high 691 (2023) · low 43 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FAD, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—143
20081—2276
20090—2123
20101—178
20110—095
20120—0131
20130—082
20141—078
20150—0130
201641434182
201782660265
201892580277
201952636261
20201—2352
20212—1531
202251439559
20230—0691
20241—0603
202541864634
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

Used for retrograde injection during Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (E.S.W.L.) and leaving an indwelling ureteral stent post- E.S.W.L.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K162109: Kwart Retro-Inject Ureteral Stent.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K162109

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026