510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

SILK Surgical Suture

K162396510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 23, 201689-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.5030

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Teleflexmedical, Inc. · GAP Suture, Nonabsorbable, Silk

Cleared on Nov 23, 2016 as substantially equivalent to K153076 (Teleflexmedical, Inc., 2016) after an 89-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1994.

Decided
Nov 23, 2016
Review
89 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GAP
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K930738 (1994). 5 ancestors in all, the oldest K802093 (1980). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 3 generations backK930738 Surgical Sutures, PGL, Gut, Deklene, Opthamend EtcDeknatel, Inc. · 1994 · Recalled
  2. 2 generations backK021019 Cottony II, Silky II Polydek & Tevdek II Polyester SutureGenzyme Corp. · 2002 · Recalled
  3. 1 generation backK153076 silky II POLYDEK, cottony II, TEVDEK II, NextStitch, DEKLENE II…Teleflexmedical, Inc. · 2016
  4. This deviceK162396 SILK Surgical SutureTeleflexmedical, Inc. · 2016
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K930738Surgical Sutures, PGL, Gut, Deklene, Opthamend EtcDeknatel, Inc.19949
−2K021019Cottony II, Silky II Polydek & Tevdek II Polyester SutureGenzyme Corp.20027
−1K153076silky II POLYDEK, cottony II, TEVDEK II, NextStitch, DEKLENE II, DEKLENE MAXX…Teleflexmedical, Inc.2016—
0 (this device)K162396SILK Surgical SutureTeleflexmedical, Inc.2016—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198010
200010
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K162396, 1994–2016Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GAP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GAP device

  1. #1 K222944 SafePath Sulturing System-Silk Suture…score 9.7 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K153076silky II POLYDEK, cottony II, TEVDEK II, NextStitch, DEKLENE II, DEKLENE MAXX…
Summary page 4
…ure Regulatory Class II Product Code GAP Regulation 878.5030 III. PREDICATE DEVICE Deknatel® Nonabsorbable Surgical Sutures, K153076 IV. DEVICE DESCRIPTION Deknatel Silk Suture is a nonabsorbable, sterile, surgical suture composed of an organic protein ca…
Teleflexmedical, Inc.2016—

Also cleared against K153076: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 22 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 7.9 years on median.
  • 3 of the 5 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K153076.

How does its category compare?

All GAP devices

GAP Suture, Nonabsorbable, Silk: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2016, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · GAP

3in 2024

2007: 12008: 12016: 22017: 12018: 12023: 12024: 3
2007high 3 (2024) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GAP

193in 2024

2024: 193 days median
2007high 193 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GAP

1in 2023

2011: 212014: 12018: 12023: 1
2007high 21 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GAP

478in 2025

2007: 72008: 212009: 122010: 242011: 62012: 82013: 32014: 152015: 252016: 542017: 552018: 3402019: 3332020: 4262021: 4372022: 4192023: 4042024: 4552025: 478
2007high 478 (2025) · low 3 (2013)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GAP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—07
20081—021
20090—012
20100—024
20110—216
20120—08
20130—03
20140—115
20150—025
20162—054
20171—055
20181—1340
20190—0333
20200—0426
20210—0437
20220—0419
20231—1404
202431930455
20250—0478
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

Deknatel® Silk Surgical Suture is indicated for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, including use in cardiovascular, ophthalmic and neurological procedures.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K162396: SILK Surgical Suture.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K162396

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026