510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2026

Direxion and Direxion HI-FLO Torqueable Microcatheters

K163701510(k) SpecialCleared May 16, 2017138-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.1210Recalls 41

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Boston Scientific Corporation · KRA Catheter, Continuous Flush

Cleared on May 16, 2017 as substantially equivalent to K142259 (Boston Scientific Corp, 2014) after a 138-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 2000. 3 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 41 times.

Decided
May 16, 2017
Review
138 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KRA
Recalls
41
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K000177 (2000). 3 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

  1. Root · 4 generations backK000177 Renegade HI-Flo MicrocatheterBoston Scientific Corp · 2000 · Recalled
  2. 3 generations backK100892 Renegade HI-Flo Fathom Kit Model M001182XXXBoston Scientific Corp · 2010
  3. 2 generations backK132947 Direxion and Direxion HI-Flo Torqueable MicrocathetersBoston Scientific Corp · 2013
  4. 1 generation backK142259 Direxion Torqueable MicrocatheterBoston Scientific Corp · 2014
  5. This deviceK163701 Direxion and Direxion HI-FLO Torqueable MicrocathetersBoston Scientific Corporation · 2017
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK201792 TRUSELECT MicrocatheterBoston Scientific Corporation · 2020
  7. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK260771 TruSelect™ 2.6 MicrocatheterBoston Scientific Corporation · 2026
  8. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK231821 XO Cath Microcatheter (E20-090-S, E20-110-S, E20-130-S, E20-150-S…Transit Scientific, LLC · 2023

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K201792TRUSELECT MicrocatheterBoston Scientific Corporation · 2020 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K260771TruSelect™ 2.6 MicrocatheterBoston Scientific Corporation · 2026 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K231821XO Cath Microcatheter (E20-090-S, E20-110-S, E20-130-S, E20-150-S, E20-175-S, E20-220-S…Transit Scientific, LLC · 2023 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K000177Renegade HI-Flo MicrocatheterBoston Scientific Corp20005
−3K100892Renegade HI-Flo Fathom Kit Model M001182XXXBoston Scientific Corp2010—
−2K132947Direxion and Direxion HI-Flo Torqueable MicrocathetersBoston Scientific Corp2013—
−1K142259Direxion Torqueable MicrocatheterBoston Scientific Corp2014—
0 (this device)K163701Direxion and Direxion HI-FLO Torqueable MicrocathetersBoston Scientific Corporation2017—
+1K201792TRUSELECT MicrocatheterBoston Scientific Corporation2020—
+2K260771TruSelect™ 2.6 MicrocatheterBoston Scientific Corporation2026—
+1K231821XO Cath Microcatheter (E20-090-S, E20-110-S, E20-130-S, E20-150-S, E20-175-S…Transit Scientific, LLC2023—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202010
202310
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K163701, 2000–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KRA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new KRA device

  1. #1 K253509 TriSalus TriNav Advance Infusion Systemscore 14.5 · 9 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K142259Direxion Torqueable Microcatheter
Summary page 4
…Catheters Classification Class II per CFR 870.1210 Predicate Device Boston Scientific Direxion Microcatheters: • K142259, KRA, September 10, 2014 ___________________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 3…
Boston Scientific Corp2014—

What descends from it? (3)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K201792TRUSELECT MicrocatheterBoston Scientific Corporation20201
K231821XO Cath Microcatheter (E20-090-S, E20-110-S, E20-130-S, E20-150-S, E20-175-S, E20-220-S…Transit Scientific, LLC20230

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0224-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0249-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0232-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0255-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0227-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0245-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0258-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0259-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0231-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0250-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0229-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0260-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0263-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0243-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0241-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0226-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0251-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0248-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0262-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0234-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0254-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0230-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0252-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0246-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0253-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0261-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0247-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0225-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0237-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0242-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0238-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0228-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0233-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0244-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0240-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0256-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0236-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0239-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0223-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0235-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.
Sep 16, 2026Class IIZ-0257-2027Process controlThe product is defective due to insufficient UV curing of the hydrophilic coating which is present on the outer surface of the distal segment of the microcatheters and raised ridges on nitinol sleeves due to laser cutting misalignment.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 17 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.5 years on median.
  • 1 of the 4 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K201792 (Boston Scientific Corporation, 2020) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.

How does its category compare?

All KRA devices

KRA Catheter, Continuous Flush: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2017, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · KRA

1in 2025

2007: 52008: 72009: 52010: 22011: 22012: 32013: 32014: 42016: 82017: 42018: 42019: 42020: 62021: 62022: 62023: 72025: 12026 (partial year): 5
2007high 8 (2016) · low 0 (2015)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KRA

63in 2023

2007: 44 days median2008: 144 days median2009: 69 days median2012: 29 days median2013: 126 days median2014: 61 days median2016: 122 days median2017: 166 days median2018: 178 days median2019: 133 days median2020: 29 days median2021: 108 days median2022: 228 days median2023: 63 days median2026 (partial year): 268 days median
2007high 268 (2026) · low 29 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · KRA

41so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2007: 22008: 62009: 82010: 262011: 32012: 32013: 22014: 3, 2 Class I2015: 12016: 3, 1 Class I2019: 4, 4 Class I2020: 12023: 22026 (partial year): 41
2007high 41 (2026) · low 0 (2017)2026

Class I (7 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · KRA

980in 2025

2007: 1182008: 1172009: 1872010: 3552011: 2392012: 2172013: 2092014: 2762015: 3392016: 4182017: 5382018: 4342019: 4182020: 3812021: 4402022: 5432023: 8292024: 9422025: 980
2007high 980 (2025) · low 117 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KRA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20075442118
200871446117
20095698187
20102—26355
20112—3239
20123293217
201331262209
20144613 (2)276
20150—1339
201681223 (1)418
201741660538
201841780434
201941334 (4)418
20206291381
202161080440
202262280543
20237632829
20240—0942
20251—0980
2026526841—

What is it indicated for?

The Direxion and Direxion HI-FLO Torqueable Microcatheters are intended for peripheral vascular use. The pre-loaded Fathom and Transend Guidewires can be used to selectively introduce and position the microcatheter in the peripheral vasculature. The microcatheter can be used for controlled and selective infusion of diagnostic, embolic, or therapeutic materials into the vessel.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K163701: Direxion and Direxion HI-FLO Torqueable Microcatheters.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K163701

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026