510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Cetus system, Cetus probe

K170183510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 27, 2017247-day reviewClass II21 CFR 886.4150

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

A.R.C Laser GmbH · HQE Instrument, Vitreous Aspiration And Cutting, Ac-Powered

Cleared on Sep 27, 2017 as substantially equivalent to K993154 (A.R.C. Laser Corp., 2000) after a 247-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1989.

Decided
Sep 27, 2017
Review
247 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HQE
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K894278 (1989). 5 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1995: 2 other ancestors1992: 1 other ancestorK894278 · Storz Daisyplus Series Microsurgical Systems · Storz Instrument Co. · 1989K993154 · Laser Photolysis System, Pharo Ophthalmic Surgery System · A.R.C. Laser Corp. · 2000 · recalled1985199019952000200520102015
  1. Root · 2 generations backK894278 Storz Daisyplus Series Microsurgical SystemsStorz Instrument Co. · 1989
  2. 1 generation backK993154 Laser Photolysis System, Pharo Ophthalmic Surgery SystemA.R.C. Laser Corp. · 2000 · Recalled
  3. This deviceK170183 Cetus system, Cetus probeA.R.C Laser GmbH · 2017
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K894278Storz Daisyplus Series Microsurgical SystemsStorz Instrument Co.1989—
−1K993154Laser Photolysis System, Pharo Ophthalmic Surgery SystemA.R.C. Laser Corp.20001
0 (this device)K170183Cetus system, Cetus probeA.R.C Laser GmbH2017—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199210
199520
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K170183, 1989–2017Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HQE? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HQE device

  1. #1 K212763 UniVit HE, UniVit UHSscore 4.1 · 2 generations · no Class I recall
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K993154Laser Photolysis System, Pharo Ophthalmic Surgery System
Summary page 4
…nd cutting instrument, ophthalmic Device product code: HQE Device Classification 21 CFR 886.4150 Predicate Device: Laser Photolysis System, K993154 A.R.C. Cetus System - 510k Summary…
A.R.C. Laser Corp.20001

Also cleared against K993154: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 28 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 17.2 years on median.
  • 1 of the 5 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K993154.

How does its category compare?

All HQE devices

HQE Instrument, Vitreous Aspiration And Cutting, Ac-Powered: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2017, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · HQE

1in 2022

2011: 12012: 22014: 12016: 12017: 12022: 1
2007high 2 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HQE

Too few HQE 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · HQE

1in 2025

2007: 22010: 112016: 42025: 12026 (partial year): 3
2007high 11 (2010) · low 0 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HQE

339in 2025

2007: 3002008: 652009: 342010: 272011: 212012: 342013: 92014: 92015: 92016: 102017: 592018: 3092019: 412020: 302021: 322022: 462023: 1082024: 1052025: 339
2007high 339 (2025) · low 9 (2013)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HQE, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—2300
20080—065
20090—034
20100—1127
20111—021
20122—034
20130—09
20141—09
20150—09
20161—410
20171—059
20180—0309
20190—041
20200—030
20210—032
20221—046
20230—0108
20240—0105
20250—1339
20260—3—

What is it indicated for?

The Cetus Laser System is indicated for use in phacofragmentation of the cataractous crystalline lens.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K170183: Cetus system, Cetus probe.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K170183

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026