510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Cyber Ho

K170331510(k) SpecialCleared Mar 3, 201729-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4810

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Quanta System Spa · GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument

Cleared on Mar 3, 2017 as substantially equivalent to K163009 (Quanta System Spa, 2016) and 1 other predicate after a 29-day review. Its family tree reaches back 8 generations to 1994. 9 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Mar 3, 2017
Review
29 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GEX
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 8 generations to K936109 (1994). 35 ancestors in all, the oldest K853620 (1986). 9 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2014: 1 other ancestor2009: 1 other ancestor2000: 1 other ancestor1999: 1 other ancestor1995: 4 other ancestors2004: 1 other ancestor1998: 3 other ancestors1996: 2 other ancestors1994: 3 other ancestors1993: 1 other ancestor1992: 2 other ancestors1991: 3 other ancestors1990: 1 other ancestor1989: 1 other ancestor1997: 1 other ancestor1986: 1 other ancestor2017: 1 descendant cleared2020: 2 descendants cleared2018: 2 descendants cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared2024: 1 descendant cleared2025: 1 descendant cleared2026: 1 descendant clearedK936109 · Sharplan Model 1120 CO2 Surgical Laser · Sharplan Lasers, Inc. · 1994K960521 · Sharplan Lasers, Inc. Silktouch Flash Scanner · Sharplan Lasers, Inc. · 1996K963339 · Coherent Ultrapulse CO2 Surgical Lasers · Coherent Medical Group · 1997K974789 · Coherent Ultrapulse S Series CO2 Surgical Lasers Model C and L · Lumenis, Inc. · 1998K990947 · Modified Versapulse Select Single Wavelength, HO: Yag and Dual Wavelength, HO: Yag/ND: Yag Surgical Lasers and Delivery · Lumenis, Inc. · 1999K011703 · Lumenis Versapulse Powersuite Holmium (HO:Yag) and Dual Wavelength (HO:Yag/ND:Yag) Surgical Lasers and Delivery Devices · Lumenis · 2001 · recalledK140388 · Lumenis Pulse 120H · Lumenis, Ltd. · 2014K163009 · Litho · Quanta System Spa · 20161990200020102020
  1. Root · 8 generations backK936109 Sharplan Model 1120 CO2 Surgical LaserSharplan Lasers, Inc. · 1994
  2. 7 generations backK960521 Sharplan Lasers, Inc. Silktouch Flash ScannerSharplan Lasers, Inc. · 1996
  3. 6 generations backK963339 Coherent Ultrapulse CO2 Surgical LasersCoherent Medical Group · 1997
  4. 5 generations backK974789 Coherent Ultrapulse S Series CO2 Surgical Lasers Model C and LLumenis, Inc. · 1998
  5. 4 generations backK990947 Modified Versapulse Select Single Wavelength, HO: Yag and Dual…Lumenis, Inc. · 1999
  6. 3 generations backK011703 Lumenis Versapulse Powersuite Holmium (HO:Yag) and Dual Wavelength…Lumenis · 2001 · Recalled
  7. 2 generations backK140388 Lumenis Pulse 120HLumenis, Ltd. · 2014
  8. 1 generation backK163009 LithoQuanta System Spa · 2016
  9. This deviceK170331 Cyber HoQuanta System Spa · 2017
  10. Descendant · cites it directly · 8 of its ownK172025 Litho 60Quanta System Spa · 2017
  11. Descendant · 2 generations on · 6 of its ownK180922 Empower H100, Cyber Ho 100, Litho 100Quanta System Spa · 2018
  12. Descendant · 2 generations on · 5 of its ownK192600 Cyber Ho 60, Cyber Ho 100, Litho 100, Litho 60Quanta System Spa · 2020
  13. Descendant · 3 generations on · 3 of its ownK201455 Litho 150, Cyber Ho 150Quanta System Spa · 2020
  14. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK180423 Empower H65Quanta System Spa · 2018

Showing 5 of 9 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2017: 12018: 22020: 22023: 12024: 12025: 12026: 1
2017high 2 (2018) · low 0 (2019)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 9 · See all
  • K172025Litho 60Quanta System Spa · 2017 · cites it directly8descendants
  • K180922Empower H100, Cyber Ho 100, Litho 100Quanta System Spa · 2018 · 2 generations on6descendants
  • K192600Cyber Ho 60, Cyber Ho 100, Litho 100, Litho 60Quanta System Spa · 2020 · 2 generations on5descendants
  • K201455Litho 150, Cyber Ho 150Quanta System Spa · 2020 · 3 generations on3descendants
  • K180423Empower H65Quanta System Spa · 2018 · 2 generations on1descendant
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−8K936109Sharplan Model 1120 CO2 Surgical LaserSharplan Lasers, Inc.1994—
−7K960521Sharplan Lasers, Inc. Silktouch Flash ScannerSharplan Lasers, Inc.1996—
−6K963339Coherent Ultrapulse CO2 Surgical LasersCoherent Medical Group1997—
−5K974789Coherent Ultrapulse S Series CO2 Surgical Lasers Model C and LLumenis, Inc.1998—
−4K990947Modified Versapulse Select Single Wavelength, HO: Yag and Dual Wavelength, HO…Lumenis, Inc.1999—
−3K011703Lumenis Versapulse Powersuite Holmium (HO:Yag) and Dual Wavelength…Lumenis20012
−2K140388Lumenis Pulse 120HLumenis, Ltd.2014—
−1K163009LithoQuanta System Spa2016—
0 (this device)K170331Cyber HoQuanta System Spa2017—
+1K172025Litho 60Quanta System Spa2017—
+2K180922Empower H100, Cyber Ho 100, Litho 100Quanta System Spa2018—
+2K192600Cyber Ho 60, Cyber Ho 100, Litho 100, Litho 60Quanta System Spa2020—
+3K201455Litho 150, Cyber Ho 150Quanta System Spa2020—
+2K180423Empower H65Quanta System Spa2018—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198610
198910
199010
199130
199220
199310
199430
199540
199620
199710
199830
199910
200010
200410
200910
201410

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201710
201820
202020
202310
202410
202510
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K170331, 1994–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GEX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GEX device

  1. #1 K222064 The Alma Soprano Titaniumscore 38.1 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K163009Litho
Summary page 5
…ruary 15t 2017 Cyber Ho Class Il Laser surgical instrument for use in general and plastic surgery and in dermatology. 21 CFR 878.4810 GEX Device modifications Litho (K163009) — Quanta System SPA Lumenis Pulse 120h (K140388) — Lumenis LTD There are no mandatory performance standards for this device. 5…
Quanta System Spa2016—
*K140388Lumenis Pulse 120H
Summary page 5
…instrument for use in general and plastic surgery and in dermatology. 21 CFR 878.4810 GEX Device modifications Litho (K163009) — Quanta System SPA Lumenis Pulse 120h (K140388) — Lumenis LTD There are no mandatory performance standards for this device. 5-1 Description of the modificatio…
Lumenis, Ltd.2014—

Also cleared against K163009: 2 other devices →

What descends from it? (9)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K172025Litho 60Quanta System Spa20178

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 23 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.9 years on median.
  • 1 of the 35 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K172025 (Quanta System Spa, 2017) has gone furthest, with 8 descendants of its own.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K163009.

How does its category compare?

All GEX devices

GEX Powered Laser Surgical Instrument: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2017, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · GEX

83in 2025

2007: 732008: 1072009: 692010: 502011: 412012: 452013: 462014: 612015: 472016: 512017: 672018: 512019: 412020: 522021: 532022: 602023: 522024: 822025: 832026 (partial year): 57
2007high 107 (2008) · low 41 (2011)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GEX

90in 2025

2007: 79 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 100 days median2010: 96 days median2011: 83 days median2012: 118 days median2013: 144 days median2014: 147 days median2015: 112 days median2016: 114 days median2017: 90 days median2018: 78 days median2019: 88 days median2020: 90 days median2021: 123 days median2022: 152 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 90 days median2025: 90 days median2026 (partial year): 90 days median
2007high 152 (2022) · low 78 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GEX

3in 2024

2007: 92008: 22010: 42011: 182012: 52013: 32014: 62016: 12017: 5, 1 Class I2018: 52019: 62020: 12023: 62024: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 18 (2011) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GEX

2,720in 2025

2007: 3422008: 2322009: 2092010: 1,7112011: 3,0242012: 2,0002013: 2,2362014: 2,0362015: 2,0992016: 2,5852017: 2,9772018: 3,5252019: 2,7092020: 2,1832021: 3,4652022: 2,2882023: 2,3372024: 2,1872025: 2,720
2007high 3,525 (2018) · low 209 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GEX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200773799342
2008107862232
2009691000209
2010509641,711
20114183183,024
20124511852,000
20134614432,236
20146114762,036
20154711202,099
20165111412,585
201767905 (1)2,977
2018517853,525
2019418862,709
2020529012,183
20215312303,465
20226015202,288
2023528762,337
2024829032,187
2025839002,720
202657902—

What is it indicated for?

The Cyber Ho laser system, including a fiber optic delivery system, is indicated for use in surgical procedures such as open, laparoscopic and endoscopic, to perform incision, excision, resection, ablation, vaporization, coagulation and hemostasis of soft tissue and in Lithotripsy of stones.

It is indicated in medical specialties including, but not limited to:

* Urology

* Gastroenterology

* Arthroscopy

* Neurosurgery

* Pulmonary

* Gynecology

* ENT

* Dermatology

* Plastic Surgery

* General Surgery

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K170331: Cyber Ho.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K170331

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026