510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Biosoft Duo Double Loop Ureteral Stents

K170422510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 2, 2017262-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.4620

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Coloplast Corp. · FAD Stent, Ureteral

Cleared on Nov 2, 2017 as substantially equivalent to K881744 (Bivona Medical Technologies, 1988) and 1 other predicate after a 262-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1988.

Decided
Nov 2, 2017
Review
262 days
Class
Class II
Product code
FAD
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K881744 (1988). 2 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1998: 1 other ancestorK881744 · Porges Ureteral Stent · Bivona Medical Technologies · 19881985199019952000200520102015
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor K881744 · Porges Ureteral Stent · Bivona Medical Technologies · 19880
  1. Root · 1 generation backK881744 Porges Ureteral StentBivona Medical Technologies · 1988
  2. This deviceK170422 Biosoft Duo Double Loop Ureteral StentsColoplast Corp. · 2017
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K881744Porges Ureteral StentBivona Medical Technologies1988—
0 (this device)K170422Biosoft Duo Double Loop Ureteral StentsColoplast Corp.2017—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K170422, 1988–2017Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FAD? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new FAD device

  1. #1 K251890 Disposable Ureteral Stentsscore 12.4 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K881744Porges Ureteral Stent
Summary page 4
…ially equivalent in performance, indication, design and materials to Biosoft Ureteral Double Loop Stents from Coloplast A/S, cleared under premarket notification numbers K881744 and K981591. Device Description: The Biosoft duo Double loop ureteral stents are flexible tubular devices designed with open re…
Bivona Medical Technologies1988—
*K981591Vortek Ureteral Double Loop Stent, Biosoft Ureteral Double Loop Stent
Summary page 4
…lent in performance, indication, design and materials to Biosoft Ureteral Double Loop Stents from Coloplast A/S, cleared under premarket notification numbers K881744 and K981591. Device Description: The Biosoft duo Double loop ureteral stents are flexible tubular devices designed with open renal and open…
International Regulatory Consultants1998—

Also cleared against K881744: 3 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K881744.

How does its category compare?

All FAD devices

FAD Stent, Ureteral: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2017, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · FAD

4in 2025

2007: 12008: 12010: 12014: 12016: 42017: 82018: 92019: 52020: 12021: 22022: 52024: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 1
2007high 9 (2018) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FAD

186in 2025

2016: 143 days median2017: 266 days median2018: 258 days median2019: 263 days median2022: 143 days median2025: 186 days median
2007high 266 (2017) · low 143 (2016)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · FAD

4in 2025

2007: 12008: 222009: 22010: 12016: 42019: 62020: 22021: 12022: 92025: 4
2007high 22 (2008) · low 0 (2011)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · FAD

634in 2025

2007: 432008: 762009: 1232010: 782011: 952012: 1312013: 822014: 782015: 1302016: 1822017: 2652018: 2772019: 2612020: 3522021: 5312022: 5592023: 6912024: 6032025: 634
2007high 691 (2023) · low 43 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FAD, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—143
20081—2276
20090—2123
20101—178
20110—095
20120—0131
20130—082
20141—078
20150—0130
201641434182
201782660265
201892580277
201952636261
20201—2352
20212—1531
202251439559
20230—0691
20241—0603
202541864634
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

The double loop ureteral stents are used for:

- drainage of the upper urinary tract over fistulas or ureteral obstacles

- healing of the ureter

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K170422: Biosoft Duo Double Loop Ureteral Stents.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K170422

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026