510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Ossler Exam Scope

K171188510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 23, 201760-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2910

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Lr Med, Inc. · DRG Transmitters And Receivers, Physiological Signal, Radiofrequency

Cleared on Jun 23, 2017 as substantially equivalent to K120704 (3M Company, 2012) after a 60-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 1996.

Decided
Jun 23, 2017
Review
60 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DRG
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K952882 (1996). 6 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 5 generations backK952882 Personal Telemedicine SystemAmerican Telecare, Inc. · 1996
  2. 4 generations backK964554 Personal Telemedicine ModuleAmerican Telecare, Inc. · 1996
  3. 3 generations backK973873 Digital Personal Telemedicine Module, Digital PTM 1American Telecare, Inc. · 1997
  4. 2 generations backK101834 3M Littmann Scope-to Scope Software System3M Company · 2010
  5. 1 generation backK120704 3M Littmann Telesteth Online Ausculation System3M Company · 2012
  6. This deviceK171188 Ossler Exam ScopeLr Med, Inc. · 2017
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−5K952882Personal Telemedicine SystemAmerican Telecare, Inc.1996—
−4K964554Personal Telemedicine ModuleAmerican Telecare, Inc.1996—
−3K973873Digital Personal Telemedicine Module, Digital PTM 1American Telecare, Inc.1997—
−2K1018343M Littmann Scope-to Scope Software System3M Company2010—
−1K1207043M Littmann Telesteth Online Ausculation System3M Company2012—
0 (this device)K171188Ossler Exam ScopeLr Med, Inc.2017—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199710
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K171188, 1996–2017Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DRG? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DRG device

  1. #1 K223711 ANNE Onescore 20.8 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary; numbers the summary cites that cannot be its predicate are marked – and kept off the family tree.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K1207043M Littmann Telesteth Online Ausculation System
Summary page 4
…iagnostics Devices Device Classification Class II Establishment registration No. N/A Predicate Device K120704 3M Littman® TeleSteth Online Auscultation System K131243 Model JPD-FR100 Trademark…
3M Company2012—
Kept off the family treeK131243FDA’s K131243 is Non-Contact Infrared Thermometer
Our reading of the summary gave K131243, FDA’s number for Non-Contact Infrared Thermometer (Shenzhen Jumper Medical Equipment Co., Ltd.). Its FDA name has none of the distinctive words the summary uses for the device it names, “Model JPD-FR100”. Kept off the family tree.
Summary page 4
…o. N/A Predicate Device K120704 3M Littman® TeleSteth Online Auscultation System K131243 Model JPD-FR100 Trademark Notice: All Trademarks used other than those of LR Med Inc, a/k/a Galenus Scientific are registered to…
Shenzhen Jumper Medical Equipment Co., Ltd.2013—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 21 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.7 years on median.
  • None of the 6 ancestors has a recall.

How does its category compare?

All DRG devices

DRG Transmitters And Receivers, Physiological Signal, Radiofrequency: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2017, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · DRG

3in 2025

2007: 62008: 52009: 132010: 102011: 92012: 122013: 132014: 102015: 22016: 22017: 72018: 62019: 52020: 62021: 22022: 62023: 42024: 32025: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 13 (2009) · low 2 (2015)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DRG

127in 2025

2007: 63 days median2008: 74 days median2009: 94 days median2010: 68 days median2011: 104 days median2012: 103 days median2013: 146 days median2014: 177 days median2017: 98 days median2018: 220 days median2019: 122 days median2020: 159 days median2022: 287 days median2023: 212 days median2024: 125 days median2025: 127 days median
2007high 287 (2022) · low 63 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DRG

3in 2007

2007: 32026 (partial year): 1
2007high 3 (2007) · low 0 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DRG

52in 2025

2007: 142008: 92009: 52010: 132011: 122012: 92013: 132014: 972015: 1312016: 1822017: 4842018: 1662019: 702020: 822021: 1072022: 432023: 192024: 262025: 52
2007high 484 (2017) · low 5 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DRG, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007663314
200857409
2009139405
20101068013
20119104012
20121210309
201313146013
201410177097
20152—0131
20162—0182
20177980484
201862200166
20195122070
20206159082
20212—0107
20226287043
20234212019
20243125026
20253127052
20262—1—

What is it indicated for?

Ossler Exam Scope, Model OS 100 is indicated to detect and amplify heart, lung, and other body sounds as well as to measure body temperature for infants and adults for diagnostic or monitoring purposes on a patient where by the patient will benefit by uploading these data for diagnostic consultation. This does shall not be prescribed for "active patient monitoring".

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K171188: Ossler Exam Scope.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K171188

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026