510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

PUMA System

K171703510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 1, 2018266-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3030

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Panther Orthopedics, Inc. · HTN Washer, Bolt Nut

Cleared on Mar 1, 2018 as substantially equivalent to K090107 (Arthrex, Inc., 2009) and 2 other predicates after a 266-day review. Its family tree reaches back 10 generations to 1979.

Decided
Mar 1, 2018
Review
266 days
Class
Class II
Product code
HTN
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 10 generations to K792022 (1979). 62 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 10 generations backK792022 Herbert Bone ScrewZimmer, Inc. · 1979 · Recalled
  2. 6 generations between
  3. 3 generations backK061925 Mini Tightrope Repair Kit, Model AR-8911DSArthrex, Inc. · 2006
  4. 2 generations backK071978 Mini Tightrope FT Repair KitArthrex, Inc. · 2007
  5. 1 generation backK090107 Mini TightropeArthrex, Inc. · 2009
  6. This deviceK171703 PUMA SystemPanther Orthopedics, Inc. · 2018
Show all 10 generations
  1. Root · 10 generations backK792022 Herbert Bone ScrewZimmer, Inc. · 1979 · Recalled
  2. 9 generations backK974876 Bionx Distal Radius ScrewBionx Implants, Inc. · 1998
  3. 8 generations backK992947 Cannulated Smartscrew Models 224540C, 224570CBionx Implants, Ltd. · 1999
  4. 7 generations backK012001 SmartscrewBionx Implants, Ltd. · 2001
  5. 6 generations backK030900 Inion Otps Biodegradable Fixaton SystemInion, Ltd. · 2003
  6. 5 generations backK043248 Tightrope Syndesmosis Repair Kit, Titanium, Model AR-8920DS…Arthrex, Inc. · 2005
  7. 4 generations backK052776 Tightrope Acromioclavicular (AC) Device, Titanium, Stainless Steel…Arthrex, Inc. · 2005
  8. 3 generations backK061925 Mini Tightrope Repair Kit, Model AR-8911DSArthrex, Inc. · 2006
  9. 2 generations backK071978 Mini Tightrope FT Repair KitArthrex, Inc. · 2007
  10. 1 generation backK090107 Mini TightropeArthrex, Inc. · 2009
  11. This deviceK171703 PUMA SystemPanther Orthopedics, Inc. · 2018
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−10K792022Herbert Bone ScrewZimmer, Inc.19796
−9K974876Bionx Distal Radius ScrewBionx Implants, Inc.1998—
−8K992947Cannulated Smartscrew Models 224540C, 224570CBionx Implants, Ltd.1999—
−7K012001SmartscrewBionx Implants, Ltd.2001—
−6K030900Inion Otps Biodegradable Fixaton SystemInion, Ltd.2003—
−5K043248Tightrope Syndesmosis Repair Kit, Titanium, Model AR-8920DS; Stainless Steel.…Arthrex, Inc.2005—
−4K052776Tightrope Acromioclavicular (AC) Device, Titanium, Stainless Steel , Models…Arthrex, Inc.2005—
−3K061925Mini Tightrope Repair Kit, Model AR-8911DSArthrex, Inc.2006—
−2K071978Mini Tightrope FT Repair KitArthrex, Inc.2007—
−1K090107Mini TightropeArthrex, Inc.2009—
0 (this device)K171703PUMA SystemPanther Orthopedics, Inc.2018—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199030
199210
199310
199420
199530
199670
199750
199830
199950
200040
200170
200230
200320
200430
200710
201310
201410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K171703, 1979–2018Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HTN? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new HTN device

  1. #1 K201522 Arthrex Syndesmosis TightRope XP Buttress…score 16.4 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K090107Mini Tightrope
Summary page 5
…The PUMA System is substantially equivalent to the following predicates: 510(k) Number Predicate Device Name / Manufacturer Primary Predicate K090107 Mini TightRope / Arthrex, Inc.  K043248 TightRope Syndesmosis Device /…
Arthrex, Inc.2009—
*K043248Tightrope Syndesmosis Repair Kit, Titanium, Model AR-8920DS; Stainless Steel. Model…
Summary page 5
…Predicate Device Name / Manufacturer Primary Predicate K090107 Mini TightRope / Arthrex, Inc.  K043248 TightRope Syndesmosis Device / Arthrex, Inc. K142727 CrossCLIP Implant System / OrthoDiscovery Group, LLC SUMM…
Arthrex, Inc.2005—
*K142727CrossCLIP Implant System
Summary page 5
…Primary Predicate K090107 Mini TightRope / Arthrex, Inc.  K043248 TightRope Syndesmosis Device / Arthrex, Inc. K142727 CrossCLIP Implant System / OrthoDiscovery Group, LLC SUMMARY OF NON-CLINICAL TESTING No FDA performance standards have…
Orthodiscovery Group, LLC (D.B.A. Crossroads Extremity Systems20141

Also cleared against K090107: 6 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 39 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 1.8 years on median.
  • 7 of the 62 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 6 other devices also cite its predicate K090107.

How does its category compare?

All HTN devices

HTN Washer, Bolt Nut: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2018, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · HTN

4in 2025

2007: 12008: 22009: 32011: 42013: 32014: 82015: 22016: 12017: 62018: 22019: 52020: 32021: 22022: 52023: 22024: 62025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 8 (2014) · low 0 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HTN

75in 2025

2009: 86 days median2011: 130 days median2013: 105 days median2014: 98 days median2017: 88 days median2019: 116 days median2020: 87 days median2022: 86 days median2024: 90 days median2025: 75 days median
2007high 130 (2011) · low 75 (2025)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · HTN

1in 2019

2013: 12019: 1
2007high 1 (2013) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HTN

190in 2025

2007: 142008: 112009: 222010: 172011: 122012: 692013: 452014: 332015: 352016: 432017: 302018: 482019: 532020: 812021: 1492022: 852023: 1082024: 2692025: 190
2007high 269 (2024) · low 11 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HTN, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—014
20082—011
2009386022
20100—017
20114130012
20120—069
20133105145
2014898033
20152—035
20161—043
2017688030
20182—048
20195116153
2020387081
20212—0149
2022586085
20232—0108
20246900269
20254750190
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

The PUMA System is intended as an adjunct in fracture repair involving metaphyseal, and periarticular small bone fragments where screws are not indicated, and as an adjunct in external and intramedullary fixation systems involving plates and rods, with fracture braces and casting. The PUMA System when used for fixation of bone-to-bone or soft tissue-to-bone, is intended as a fixation post, distribution bridge, or for distributing suture tension over…

Read the full statement (151 words)

The PUMA System is intended as an adjunct in fracture repair involving metaphyseal, and periarticular small bone fragments where screws are not indicated, and as an adjunct in external and intramedullary fixation systems involving plates and rods, with fracture braces and casting.

The PUMA System when used for fixation of bone-to-bone or soft tissue-to-bone, is intended as a fixation post, distribution bridge, or for distributing suture tension over areas of ligament or tendon repair.

Specifically, the PUMA System is indicated to provide fixation during the healing process for the following:

• Fixation of Syndesmosis disruptions in connection with Weber B and C ankle fractures.

• Fixation of Syndesmosis disruptions in connection with dorsal distal radioulnar ligament (DRUL) disruptions.

• Tarsometatarsal (TMT) injury, such as fixation of foot soft tissue separations due to a Lisfranc Injury.

• Hallux Valgus reconstruction by providing for the reduction of 1st and 2nd metatarsal intermetatarsal angle.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K171703: PUMA System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K171703

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026