510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

UTS Stem

K172251510(k) TraditionalCleared Oct 24, 201790-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3358

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

United Orthopedic Corporation · LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented

Cleared on Oct 24, 2017 as substantially equivalent to K110245 (United Orthopedic Corporation, 2011) and 4 other predicates after a 90-day review. Its family tree reaches back 8 generations to 1997. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Oct 24, 2017
Review
90 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LPH
Recalls
None
Predicates
5

Its longest line of descent runs back 8 generations to P960047 (1997). 31 ancestors in all, the oldest K830313 (1983). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2008: 1 other ancestor2005: 1 other ancestor1994: 6 other ancestors2003: 1 other ancestor2001: 1 other ancestor1996: 3 other ancestors1983: 1 other ancestor2000: 1 other ancestor1999: 2 other ancestors1998: 1 other ancestor1997: 2 other ancestors1995: 1 other ancestor1986: 1 other ancestor1985: 1 other ancestor2025: 1 descendant clearedP960047 · Osteonics Constrained Acetabular Insert · Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · 1997×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K021728 (2002), K030047 (2003) K043537 · Taperloc 12/14 Taper Femoral Components · Biomet, Inc. · 2005K110245 · United Utf Stem · United Orthopedic Corporation · 2011 · recalled×2: 2 generations cleared close together, K123550 (2013), K132207 (2013) K163193 · UTF Stem, reduced, #0, #00 · United Orthopedic Corporation · 201719801990200020102020
  1. Root · 8 generations backP960047 Osteonics Constrained Acetabular InsertHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 1997
  2. 7 generations backK021728 Ringloc Constrained Liners IIBiomet, Inc. · 2002
  3. 6 generations backK030047 Freedom Constrained LinersBiomet, Inc. · 2003
  4. 5 generations backK043537 Taperloc 12/14 Taper Femoral ComponentsBiomet, Inc. · 2005
  5. 4 generations backK110245 United Utf StemUnited Orthopedic Corporation · 2011 · Recalled
  6. 3 generations backK123550 Utf Stem, ReducedUnited Orthopedic Corporation · 2013
  7. 2 generations backK132207 Utf Stem-Reduced, Additional SizesUnited Orthopedic Corporation · 2013
  8. 1 generation backK163193 UTF Stem, reduced, #0, #00United Orthopedic Corporation · 2017
  9. This deviceK172251 UTS StemUnited Orthopedic Corporation · 2017
  10. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK242315 Resolve Modular Revision Hip StemUnited Orthopedic Corporation · 2025

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K242315Resolve Modular Revision Hip StemUnited Orthopedic Corporation · 2025 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−8P960047Osteonics Constrained Acetabular InsertHowmedica Osteonics Corp.1997—
−7K021728Ringloc Constrained Liners IIBiomet, Inc.2002—
−6K030047Freedom Constrained LinersBiomet, Inc.2003—
−5K043537Taperloc 12/14 Taper Femoral ComponentsBiomet, Inc.2005—
−4K110245United Utf StemUnited Orthopedic Corporation20111
−3K123550Utf Stem, ReducedUnited Orthopedic Corporation2013—
−2K132207Utf Stem-Reduced, Additional SizesUnited Orthopedic Corporation2013—
−1K163193UTF Stem, reduced, #0, #00United Orthopedic Corporation2017—
0 (this device)K172251UTS StemUnited Orthopedic Corporation2017—
+1K242315Resolve Modular Revision Hip StemUnited Orthopedic Corporation2025—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198310
198510
198610
199460
199510
199630
199720
199810
199920
200010
200110
200310
200510
200810

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K172251, 1997–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LPH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LPH device

  1. #1 K233498 Stryker Orthopaedics Hip Systems Labeling Updatescore 24.2 · 20 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (5)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K110245United Utf Stem
Summary page 4
…thopedic Panel. Device Class Class II Classification Panel Orthopaedics Product Code LPH, KWY, LZO Predicate Device 1. “UNITED” UTF Stem (K110245) 2. “UNITED” UTF Stem, Reduced (K123550) 3. “UNITED” UTF Stem-reduced, Additional…
United Orthopedic Corporation20111
*K123550Utf Stem, Reduced
Summary page 4
…Panel Orthopaedics Product Code LPH, KWY, LZO Predicate Device 1. “UNITED” UTF Stem (K110245) 2. “UNITED” UTF Stem, Reduced (K123550) 3. “UNITED” UTF Stem-reduced, Additional Sizes (K132207)…
United Orthopedic Corporation2013—
*K132207Utf Stem-Reduced, Additional Sizes
Summary page 4
…110245) 2. “UNITED” UTF Stem, Reduced (K123550) 3. “UNITED” UTF Stem-reduced, Additional Sizes (K132207) 4. “UNITED” UTF Stem, reduced, #0, #00 (K163193) 5. Depuy Tri-lock Bone Preserva…
United Orthopedic Corporation2013—
*K163193UTF Stem, reduced, #0, #00
Summary page 4
…3. “UNITED” UTF Stem-reduced, Additional Sizes (K132207) 4. “UNITED” UTF Stem, reduced, #0, #00 (K163193) 5. Depuy Tri-lock Bone Preservation Stem (K073570)…
United Orthopedic Corporation2017—
*K073570Depuy Tri-Lock Bone Preservation Stem
Summary page 4
…(K132207) 4. “UNITED” UTF Stem, reduced, #0, #00 (K163193) 5. Depuy Tri-lock Bone Preservation Stem (K073570) K172251 Page 2 of 4 UTS Stem…
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.2008—

Also cleared against K110245: 4 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K242315Resolve Modular Revision Hip StemUnited Orthopedic Corporation20250

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 20 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.0 years on median.
  • 4 of the 31 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K242315 (United Orthopedic Corporation, 2025) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 4 other devices also cite its predicate K110245.

How does its category compare?

All LPH devices

LPH Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2017, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LPH

12in 2025

2007: 102008: 102009: 32010: 152011: 162012: 252013: 112014: 202015: 182016: 102017: 122018: 92019: 222020: 72021: 82022: 142023: 102024: 62025: 122026 (partial year): 8
2007high 25 (2012) · low 3 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LPH

153in 2025

2007: 116 days median2008: 86 days median2009: 112 days median2010: 100 days median2011: 110 days median2012: 76 days median2013: 135 days median2014: 129 days median2015: 111 days median2016: 150 days median2017: 121 days median2018: 145 days median2019: 164 days median2020: 164 days median2021: 410 days median2022: 247 days median2023: 111 days median2024: 92 days median2025: 153 days median2026 (partial year): 256 days median
2007high 410 (2021) · low 76 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LPH

4in 2025

2007: 162008: 12009: 22010: 222011: 262012: 302013: 92014: 32015: 12016: 82017: 142018: 22019: 82020: 62021: 42022: 22023: 22024: 12025: 42026 (partial year): 2
2007high 30 (2012) · low 1 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LPH

6,163in 2025

2007: 5092008: 7062009: 1,1562010: 2,0072011: 3,3202012: 3,7852013: 5,0022014: 5,1632015: 5,8302016: 4,9002017: 5,3122018: 5,9542019: 7,1302020: 5,4292021: 5,9782022: 5,2232023: 5,3452024: 5,6262025: 6,163
2007high 7,130 (2019) · low 509 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LPH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071011616509
200810861706
2009311221,156
201015100222,007
201116110263,320
20122576303,785
20131113595,002
20142012935,163
20151811115,830
20161015084,900
201712121145,312
2018914525,954
20192216487,130
2020716465,429
2021841045,978
20221424725,223
20231011125,345
202469215,626
20251215346,163
202682562—

What is it indicated for?

This device is indicated for use in total hip replacement or bipolar hip replacement undergoing primary and revision surgery for the following conditions:

1. Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, ankylosis, protrusion acetabuli, and painful hip dysplasia.

2. Inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as rheumatoid arthritis.

3. Correction of functional deformity.

4. Treatment of non-union, femoral neck fracture and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement, unmanageable using other techniques.

5. Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed.

This device is designed for cementless use.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K172251: UTS Stem.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K172251

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026