510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2020

Portex NRFit Epidural Needles, Portex NRFit Spinal Needles, Portex NRFit Loss of Resistance (L.O.R.) Syringes., Portex EpiFuse Catheter Connector, Portex Regional Anaesthesia Portfolio Filters

K172410510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 1, 2018296-day reviewClass II21 CFR 868.5150Recalls 2

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Smiths Medical Asd, Inc. · BSP Needle, Conduction, Anesthetic (W/Wo Introducer)

Cleared on Jun 1, 2018 as substantially equivalent to K110053 (Smiths Medical Asd, Inc., 2012) after a 296-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1997. It has been recalled 2 times.

Decided
Jun 1, 2018
Review
296 days
Class
Class II
Product code
BSP
Recalls
2
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K965017 (1997). 6 ancestors in all, the oldest K801343 (1980). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 3 generations backK965017 Regional Anesthesia TraysSmiths Industries Medical Systems, Inc. · 1997 · Recalled
  2. 2 generations backK092657 Epifuse Catheter Connector, Model: 4909ESmiths Medical Asd, Inc. · 2009
  3. 1 generation backK110053 Correctinject Safety System, Catheter Connector, Filter, Infusion…Smiths Medical Asd, Inc. · 2012
  4. This deviceK172410 Portex NRFit Epidural Needles, Portex NRFit Spinal Needles, Portex…Smiths Medical Asd, Inc. · 2018
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K965017Regional Anesthesia TraysSmiths Industries Medical Systems, Inc.19977
−2K092657Epifuse Catheter Connector, Model: 4909ESmiths Medical Asd, Inc.2009—
−1K110053Correctinject Safety System, Catheter Connector, Filter, Infusion Adaptor…Smiths Medical Asd, Inc.2012—
0 (this device)K172410Portex NRFit Epidural Needles, Portex NRFit Spinal Needles, Portex NRFit Loss…Smiths Medical Asd, Inc.2018—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198010
199810
200910
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K172410, 1997–2018Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in BSP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new BSP device

  1. #1 K241954 SonoBlock; SonoBlock IIscore 11.0 · 1 generation · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K110053Correctinject Safety System, Catheter Connector, Filter, Infusion Adaptor, Syringe Kit
Summary page 4
…conduction kit Regulatory Class II II Product Code CAZ CAZ 510(k) K110053 K172410 Predicate Device Subject Device Trade Name…
Smiths Medical Asd, Inc.2012—

Also cleared against K110053: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Dec 8, 2020Class IIZ-0152-2022Error in labelingThe labeling was missing information on sterilization and prohibition of reuse.
Feb 28, 2020Class IIZ-1820-2020Labeling mix-upsCases of Portex¿ Lumbar Puncture Tray Child, SKU #4826PL-20 had been mislabeled with invalid information. The product was correct, but the inner trays were labeled as 4824PL-20 instead of 4826PL-20.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 21 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 5.7 years on median.
  • 2 of the 6 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K110053.

How does its category compare?

All BSP devices

BSP Needle, Conduction, Anesthetic (W/Wo Introducer): FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2018, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · BSP

4in 2025

2007: 32008: 82009: 52010: 32011: 32012: 32013: 22014: 22015: 22016: 62017: 42018: 82019: 22020: 32021: 32022: 22024: 32025: 4
2007high 8 (2008) · low 0 (2023)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · BSP

170in 2025

2007: 189 days median2008: 127 days median2009: 97 days median2010: 79 days median2011: 114 days median2012: 148 days median2016: 268 days median2017: 186 days median2018: 241 days median2020: 269 days median2021: 265 days median2024: 70 days median2025: 170 days median
2007high 269 (2020) · low 70 (2024)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · BSP

1in 2020

2016: 12019: 12020: 12026 (partial year): 1, 1 Class I
2007high 1 (2016) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · BSP

86in 2025

2007: 262008: 242009: 302010: 492011: 332012: 202013: 322014: 412015: 382016: 1522017: 342018: 692019: 862020: 782021: 522022: 842023: 752024: 662025: 86
2007high 152 (2016) · low 20 (2012)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code BSP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20073189026
20088127024
2009597030
2010379049
20113114033
20123148020
20132—032
20142—041
20152—038
201662681152
20174186034
20188241069
20192—186
20203269178
20213265052
20222—084
20230—075
2024370066
20254170086
20260—1 (1)—

What is it indicated for?

PORTEX® products and components with the NRFit™ Connector are intended for the injection or infusion of regional anesthetics or narcotics. The PORTEX® LOR Syringe with NRFit™ Connector is intended for use with the NRFit™ compatible components to verify needle tip placement in the epidural space by the Loss of Resistance technique using air or saline. The NRFit™ Connector is designed to be used with regional anesthesia systems only. The PORTEX® EpiFuse…

Read the full statement (173 words)

PORTEX® products and components with the NRFit™ Connector are intended for the injection or infusion of regional anesthetics or narcotics.

The PORTEX® LOR Syringe with NRFit™ Connector is intended for use with the NRFit™ compatible components to verify needle tip placement in the epidural space by the Loss of Resistance technique using air or saline. The NRFit™ Connector is designed to be used with regional anesthesia systems only.

The PORTEX® EpiFuse Catheter with NRFit™ Connector is intended for use with the catheter and compatible components for the injection or infusion of regional anesthetics or narcotics. The key is a tool for re-opening the catheter connector.

The PORTEX® Epidural Flat Filter with NRFit™ Connector is designed for use when administering injections and/or infusions of regional anesthetics or narcotics to a patient via compatible system components. The NRFit™ Connector is designed to be used with regional anesthesia systems only.

The PORTEX® Filter Needle with NRFit™ Connector and PORTEX® Filter Straw with NRFit™ Connector are intended to draw up medication when using the PORTEX® LOR Syringe.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K172410: Portex NRFit Epidural Needles, Portex NRFit Spinal Needles, Portex NRFit Loss of Resistance (L.O.R.) Syringes., Portex EpiFuse Catheter Connector, Portex Regional Anaesthesia Portfolio Filters.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K172410

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026