510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

SignalMark Lung Biopsy Site Marker

K180175510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 7, 2018319-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4750

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

View Point Medical, Inc. · GDW Staple, Implantable

Cleared on Dec 7, 2018 as substantially equivalent to K041331 (Biopsy Sciences, LLC, 2004) after a 319-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2004.

Decided
Dec 7, 2018
Review
319 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GDW
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K041331 (2004). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 1 generation backK041331 Biopsy Sciences, LLC, Lung Biopsy Site MarkerBiopsy Sciences, LLC · 2004
  2. This deviceK180175 SignalMark Lung Biopsy Site MarkerView Point Medical, Inc. · 2018
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K041331Biopsy Sciences, LLC, Lung Biopsy Site MarkerBiopsy Sciences, LLC2004—
0 (this device)K180175SignalMark Lung Biopsy Site MarkerView Point Medical, Inc.2018—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K180175, 2004–2018Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GDW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GDW device

  1. #1 K253657 Tri-staple 2.0™ Reloads; Endo GIA™ Reloads…score 15.1 · 14 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K041331Biopsy Sciences, LLC, Lung Biopsy Site Marker
Summary page 5
…iopsy Site Marker is substantially equivalent to the following predicate: 510(k) Number Predicate Device Name / Manufacturer Primary Predicate K041331 Lung Biopsy Site Marker / Biopsy Sciences, LLC  K071937 BonAlive granules and plates /…
Biopsy Sciences, LLC2004—
†K071937Bonalive Granules and Bonalive PlatesVivoxid, Ltd.2007—
†K110925Novabone Macropor-SI+ - Bioactive Bone GraftNovabone Products, LLC2011—

Also cleared against K041331: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K041331.

How does its category compare?

All GDW devices

GDW Staple, Implantable: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2018, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · GDW

3in 2025

2007: 82008: 72009: 132010: 102011: 112012: 92013: 132014: 152015: 82016: 112017: 132018: 72019: 122020: 102021: 92022: 72023: 42024: 22025: 32026 (partial year): 3
2007high 15 (2014) · low 2 (2024)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GDW

111in 2025

2007: 56 days median2008: 57 days median2009: 27 days median2010: 39 days median2011: 49 days median2012: 45 days median2013: 49 days median2014: 63 days median2015: 111 days median2016: 96 days median2017: 103 days median2018: 90 days median2019: 205 days median2020: 88 days median2021: 233 days median2022: 89 days median2023: 267 days median2025: 111 days median2026 (partial year): 141 days median
2007high 267 (2023) · low 27 (2009)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · GDW

3in 2025

2007: 92009: 222010: 22011: 92012: 11, 1 Class I2013: 12015: 62016: 22017: 32018: 32019: 4, 4 Class I2020: 112023: 12025: 3
2007high 22 (2009) · low 0 (2008)2026

Class I (5 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GDW

11,905in 2025

2007: 2,4012008: 2,3802009: 4,0142010: 3,7682011: 3,8262012: 3,7172013: 3,7772014: 4,7842015: 4,8992016: 5,1062017: 11,6432018: 14,9142019: 16,6002020: 12,3322021: 13,0152022: 13,6052023: 14,6232024: 13,2802025: 11,905
2007high 16,600 (2019) · low 2,380 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GDW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200785692,401
200875702,380
20091327224,014
2010103923,768
2011114993,826
201294511 (1)3,717
2013134913,777
2014156304,784
2015811164,899
2016119625,106
201713103311,643
2018790314,914
2019122054 (4)16,600
202010881112,332
20219233013,015
2022789013,605
20234267114,623
20242—013,280
20253111311,905
202631410—

What is it indicated for?

The SignalMark Lung Biopsy Site Marker is intended to provide accuracy in marking a biopsy location for visualization during surgical resection.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K180175: SignalMark Lung Biopsy Site Marker.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K180175

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026