510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Zeramex (R) XT Dental Implant System, NobelPearl Dental Implant System

K180184510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 16, 2018297-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3630

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Dentalpoint AG · NHA Abutment, Implant, Dental, Endosseous

Cleared on Nov 16, 2018 as substantially equivalent to K133255 (Dentalpoint AG, 2014) after a 297-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1990.

Decided
Nov 16, 2018
Review
297 days
Class
Class II
Product code
NHA
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K894595 (1990). 16 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 4 generations backK894595 Bonefit R Screw ImplantsInstitut Straumann AG · 1990
  2. 3 generations backK984104 Iti Dental Implant SystemStraumann USA · 1999 · Recalled
  3. 2 generations backK992937 Dental ImplantNobel Biocare Uas, Inc. · 2000 · Recalled
  4. 1 generation backK133255 Zeramex T and Zeramex Plus Dental Implant SystemsDentalpoint AG · 2014
  5. This deviceK180184 Zeramex (R) XT Dental Implant System, NobelPearl Dental Implant SystemDentalpoint AG · 2018
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K894595Bonefit R Screw ImplantsInstitut Straumann AG1990—
−3K984104Iti Dental Implant SystemStraumann USA19991
−2K992937Dental ImplantNobel Biocare Uas, Inc.20001
−1K133255Zeramex T and Zeramex Plus Dental Implant SystemsDentalpoint AG2014—
0 (this device)K180184Zeramex (R) XT Dental Implant System, NobelPearl Dental Implant SystemDentalpoint AG2018—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199310
199420
199620
199710
199810
200210
200310
200720
201110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K180184, 1990–2018Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in NHA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new NHA device

  1. #1 K222288 DESS Dental Smart Solutionsscore 30.7 · 19 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K133255Zeramex T and Zeramex Plus Dental Implant Systems
Summary page 5
…assification II III. Predicate Device Substantial equivalence is claimed to the following primary predicate devices: • Zeramex® T Dental Implant System, K133255, Dentalpoint AG The following devices are referenced within the submission: • Zeramex® P6 Dental Implant System, K163043,…
Dentalpoint AG2014—
†K163043Zeramex P6 Dental Implant SystemDentalpoint AG2016—
†K152385Zeramex P6 Dental Implant SystemDentalpoint AG2016—

Also cleared against K133255: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 28 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 9.2 years on median.
  • 2 of the 16 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K133255.

How does its category compare?

All NHA devices

NHA Abutment, Implant, Dental, Endosseous: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2018, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · NHA

40in 2025

2007: 382008: 312009: 302010: 192011: 312012: 252013: 222014: 272015: 292016: 382017: 312018: 312019: 282020: 382021: 292022: 332023: 512024: 432025: 402026 (partial year): 23
2007high 51 (2023) · low 19 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NHA

147in 2025

2007: 91 days median2008: 90 days median2009: 95 days median2010: 162 days median2011: 130 days median2012: 171 days median2013: 184 days median2014: 160 days median2015: 151 days median2016: 202 days median2017: 188 days median2018: 200 days median2019: 160 days median2020: 153 days median2021: 211 days median2022: 142 days median2023: 147 days median2024: 158 days median2025: 147 days median2026 (partial year): 169 days median
2007high 211 (2021) · low 90 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · NHA

1in 2025

2007: 12008: 22011: 52012: 12013: 12015: 12016: 362017: 22018: 12020: 72023: 32025: 12026 (partial year): 3
2007high 36 (2016) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · NHA

838in 2025

2007: 12008: 82009: 302010: 612011: 562012: 52013: 1432014: 1462015: 8582016: 3142017: 5772018: 5912019: 5302020: 4582021: 5462022: 4972023: 6182024: 6352025: 838
2007high 858 (2015) · low 1 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NHA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007389111
2008319028
20093095030
201019162061
201131130556
20122517115
2013221841143
2014271600146
2015291511858
20163820236314
2017311882577
2018312001591
2019281600530
2020381537458
2021292110546
2022331420497
2023511473618
2024431580635
2025401471838
2026231693—

What is it indicated for?

The ZERAMEX® XT Dental Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper and lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore aesthetics and chewing function. The ZERAMEX® XT Dental Implant System can be used for single or multiple unit restorations. The ZERAMEX® XT Dental Implants are indicated for delayed loading. The ZERAMEX® XT dental implants are specially indicated for…

Read the full statement (164 words)

The ZERAMEX® XT Dental Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper and lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore aesthetics and chewing function. The ZERAMEX® XT Dental Implant System can be used for single or multiple unit restorations. The ZERAMEX® XT Dental Implants are indicated for delayed loading. The ZERAMEX® XT dental implants are specially indicated for patients with metal allergies/intolerances and chronic illnesses due to metal allergies/intolerances.

The NobelPearl Dental Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper and lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore aesthetics and chewing function. The NobelPearl Dental Implant System can be used for single or multiple unit restorations.

NobelPearl Dental Implant System are intended for delayed loading.

NobelPearl Dental Implant System are specially indicated for patients with metal allergies/intolerances and chronic illness due to metal allergies/intolerances.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K180184: Zeramex (R) XT Dental Implant System, NobelPearl Dental Implant System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K180184

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026