510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

EVOLUTION® Knee Systems – MR Labeling, EVOLUTION® BIOFOAM® Tibial System, EVOLUTION® Revision Tibial System, EVOLUTION® Revision CCK System

K180317510(k) TraditionalCleared May 4, 201888-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3565

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Microport Orthopedics, Inc. · MBH Prosthesis, Knee, Patello/Femorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Porous, Coated, Polymer/Metal/Polymer

Cleared on May 4, 2018 as substantially equivalent to K152298 (Microport Orthopedics, Inc., 2015) and 2 other predicates after an 88-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 2005.

Decided
May 4, 2018
Review
88 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MBH
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K043083 (2005). 8 ancestors in all, the oldest K932677 (1994). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 5 generations backK043083 Advance HA Coated Spiked Tibial Base and Advance HA Coated Modular…Wrightmedicaltechnologyinc · 2005
  2. 4 generations backK143366 ADVANCE Porous Coated Spiked Tibial BaseMicroport Orthopedics, Inc. · 2015
  3. 3 generations backK152298 EVOLUTION BIOFOAM Tibial Base, EVOLUTION Modular Keels, ADVANCE…Microport Orthopedics, Inc. · 2015
  4. 2 generations backK162026 EVOLUTION Revision Tibial Base, EVOLUTION Revision Tibial Block…Microport Orthopedics, Inc. · 2017
  5. 1 generation backK171389 EVOLUTION Revision CCK SystemMicroport Orthopedics, Inc. · 2017
  6. This deviceK180317 EVOLUTION® Knee Systems – MR Labeling, EVOLUTION® BIOFOAM® Tibial…Microport Orthopedics, Inc. · 2018
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−5K043083Advance HA Coated Spiked Tibial Base and Advance HA Coated Modular KeelWrightmedicaltechnologyinc2005—
−4K143366ADVANCE Porous Coated Spiked Tibial BaseMicroport Orthopedics, Inc.2015—
−3K152298EVOLUTION BIOFOAM Tibial Base, EVOLUTION Modular Keels, ADVANCE Modular Keels…Microport Orthopedics, Inc.2015—
−2K162026EVOLUTION Revision Tibial Base, EVOLUTION Revision Tibial Block Augment…Microport Orthopedics, Inc.2017—
−1K171389EVOLUTION Revision CCK SystemMicroport Orthopedics, Inc.2017—
0 (this device)K180317EVOLUTION® Knee Systems – MR Labeling, EVOLUTION® BIOFOAM® Tibial System…Microport Orthopedics, Inc.2018—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199410
201010
201410
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K180317, 2005–2018Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MBH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MBH device

  1. #1 K241597 Freedom® Total Knee System - Porous Tibial…score 19.9 · 8 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K152298EVOLUTION BIOFOAM Tibial Base, EVOLUTION Modular Keels, ADVANCE Modular Keels, ADVANCE…
Summary page 4
…d Panel Code: Orthopedics/87/MBH, JWH Predicate Devices: EVOLUTION® BIOFOAM® Tibial System (K152298) EVOLUTION® Revision Tibial System (K162026)…
Microport Orthopedics, Inc.2015—
*K162026EVOLUTION Revision Tibial Base, EVOLUTION Revision Tibial Block Augment, EVOLUTION…
Summary page 4
…evices: EVOLUTION® BIOFOAM® Tibial System (K152298) EVOLUTION® Revision Tibial System (K162026) EVOLUTION® Revision CCK System (K171389) Reference Device:…
Microport Orthopedics, Inc.2017—
*K171389EVOLUTION Revision CCK System
Summary page 4
…EVOLUTION® Revision Tibial System (K162026) EVOLUTION® Revision CCK System (K171389) Reference Device: MPO Total Knee Systems MR Labeling (K152631) MicroPort Orthopedics Inc.…
Microport Orthopedics, Inc.2017—
†K152631MPO Total Knee Systems MR LabelingMicroport Orthopedics, Inc.2016—

Also cleared against K152298: 4 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 13 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 10 months on median.
  • 1 of the 8 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 4 other devices also cite its predicate K152298.

How does its category compare?

All MBH devices

MBH Prosthesis, Knee, Patello/Femorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Porous, Coated, Polymer/Metal/Polymer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2018, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MBH

8in 2025

2007: 102008: 32009: 32010: 42011: 52012: 52013: 62014: 92015: 82016: 42017: 42018: 62019: 12020: 72021: 62022: 72023: 62024: 102025: 82026 (partial year): 7
2007high 10 (2007) · low 1 (2019)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MBH

98in 2025

2007: 59 days median2008: 70 days median2009: 209 days median2010: 84 days median2011: 84 days median2012: 90 days median2013: 138 days median2014: 114 days median2015: 100 days median2016: 74 days median2017: 115 days median2018: 89 days median2020: 112 days median2021: 48 days median2022: 57 days median2023: 94 days median2024: 84 days median2025: 98 days median2026 (partial year): 153 days median
2007high 209 (2009) · low 48 (2021)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MBH

1in 2024

2009: 22011: 152012: 1, 1 Class I2013: 4, 4 Class I2016: 12017: 92018: 12019: 12020: 22023: 22024: 12026 (partial year): 4
2007high 15 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (5 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MBH

1,561in 2025

2007: 272008: 212009: 892010: 1212011: 2472012: 3702013: 3082014: 3852015: 9552016: 1,0342017: 1,0072018: 1,1912019: 1,3942020: 1,0892021: 1,5392022: 1,2612023: 1,2632024: 1,4972025: 1,561
2007high 1,561 (2025) · low 21 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MBH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071059027
2008370021
20093209289
20104840121
201158415247
20125901 (1)370
201361384 (4)308
201491140385
201581000955
201647411,034
2017411591,007
201868911,191
20191—11,394
2020711221,089
202164801,539
202275701,261
202369421,263
2024108411,497
202589801,561
202671534—

What is it indicated for?

The EVOLUTION® BIOFOAM® Tibial, EVOLUTION® Revision Tibial, and EVOLUTION® Revision CCK Systems are indicated for use in knee arthroplasty in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions: 1. Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease: including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis; 2. Inflammatory degenerative joint disease, including rheumatoid arthritis; 3. Correction of functional deformity; 4. Revision procedures…

Read the full statement (97 words)

The EVOLUTION® BIOFOAM® Tibial, EVOLUTION® Revision Tibial, and EVOLUTION® Revision CCK Systems are indicated for use in knee arthroplasty in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions:

1. Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease: including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis;

2. Inflammatory degenerative joint disease, including rheumatoid arthritis;

3. Correction of functional deformity;

4. Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques.

The EVOLUTION® BIOFOAM® Tibial System implants are for cementless use only.

The EVOLUTION® Revision Tibial and EVOLUTION® Revision CCK Systems are for cemented use only.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K180317: EVOLUTION® Knee Systems – MR Labeling, EVOLUTION® BIOFOAM® Tibial System, EVOLUTION® Revision Tibial System, EVOLUTION® Revision CCK System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K180317

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026