510(k) · Cleared
Recalled · Class II · 2025vital signs monitor
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Edan Instruments, Inc. · DQA Oximeter
Cleared on Dec 21, 2018 as substantially equivalent to K131818 (Edan Instruments, Inc., 2013) after a 312-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 2010. It has been recalled once.
- Decided
- Dec 21, 2018
- Review
- 312 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- DQA
- Recalls
- 1
- Predicates
- 1
Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K102835 (2010). 5 ancestors in all, the oldest K003313 (2001). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 3 generations backK102835 Vital Signs MonitorEdan Instruments, Inc. · 2010
- 2 generations backK120144 Vital Signs MonitorEdan Instruments, Inc. · 2012
- 1 generation backK131818 Vital Signs MonitorEdan Instruments, Inc. · 2013 · Recalled
- This deviceK180380 vital signs monitorEdan Instruments, Inc. · 2018
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −3 | K102835 | Vital Signs Monitor | Edan Instruments, Inc. | 2010 | — |
| −2 | K120144 | Vital Signs Monitor | Edan Instruments, Inc. | 2012 | — |
| −1 | K131818 | Vital Signs Monitor | Edan Instruments, Inc. | 2013 | 2 |
| 0 (this device) | K180380 | vital signs monitor | Edan Instruments, Inc. | 2018 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 1 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in DQA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new DQA device
- #1 K221282 Empatica Health Monitoring Platformscore 20.1 · 38 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
Recalls of this device
| Date | Class | Recall | Root cause | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2025 | Class II | Z-1143-2026 | Device Design | As a result of receiving an FDA It Has Come to Our Attention Letter (IHCTOA Letter) regarding potential cybersecurity issues with various of the firm device. |
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 8 years and passes through 1 company; a new generation was cleared every 1.5 years on median.
- 1 of the 5 ancestors has a recall of any class.
How does its category compare?
All DQA devicesDQA Oximeter: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2018, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · DQA
15in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · DQA
182in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · DQA
3in 2024
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · DQA
399in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code DQA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 20 | 122 | 6 | 325 |
| 2008 | 22 | 97 | 5 | 312 |
| 2009 | 35 | 117 | 29 | 281 |
| 2010 | 29 | 127 | 4 | 185 |
| 2011 | 15 | 195 | 1 | 164 |
| 2012 | 14 | 120 | 0 | 322 |
| 2013 | 15 | 182 | 0 | 468 |
| 2014 | 11 | 175 | 2 | 1,124 |
| 2015 | 13 | 158 | 1 | 2,082 |
| 2016 | 14 | 246 | 0 | 1,775 |
| 2017 | 9 | 200 | 0 | 1,190 |
| 2018 | 18 | 260 | 32 | 694 |
| 2019 | 19 | 158 | 0 | 548 |
| 2020 | 15 | 126 | 0 | 426 |
| 2021 | 10 | 174 | 0 | 553 |
| 2022 | 20 | 265 | 0 | 478 |
| 2023 | 13 | 317 | 0 | 392 |
| 2024 | 14 | 285 | 3 | 545 |
| 2025 | 15 | 182 | 0 | 399 |
| 2026 | 8 | 187 | 0 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The monitor is intended to be used for monitoring, storing, recording, and reviewing of, and to generate alarms for, multiple physiological parameters of adults, pediatrics and neonates. The monitor is intended for use by trained healthcare professionals in hospital environments.
Monitored parameters include: NIBP, SpO2, PR (pulse rate), Quick TEMP/Infrared TEMP.
The monitor is not intended for MRI environments. TEMP module is not intended for neonates.
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K180380 · printed Nov 5, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K180380: vital signs monitor.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K180380
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026