510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Reprocessed DecaNav Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter

K180710510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 19, 201892-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.1220

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Innovative Health, LLC · NLH Catheter, Recording, Electrode, Reprocessed

Cleared on Jun 19, 2018 as substantially equivalent to K080425 (Biosense Webster, Inc., 2008) after a 92-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1984.

Decided
Jun 19, 2018
Review
92 days
Class
Class II
Product code
NLH
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K841802 (1984). 3 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 2 generations backK841802 Electrode Catheter, Orthogonal TypeWebster Laboratories, Inc. · 1984
  2. 1 generation backK080425 CS Refstar Catheter (D- and F-Curves), Models D-1285-01 and D-1285-02Biosense Webster, Inc. · 2008
  3. This deviceK180710 Reprocessed DecaNav Diagnostic Electrophysiology CatheterInnovative Health, LLC · 2018
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K841802Electrode Catheter, Orthogonal TypeWebster Laboratories, Inc.1984—
−1K080425CS Refstar Catheter (D- and F-Curves), Models D-1285-01 and D-1285-02Biosense Webster, Inc.2008—
0 (this device)K180710Reprocessed DecaNav Diagnostic Electrophysiology CatheterInnovative Health, LLC2018—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K180710, 1984–2018Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in NLH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new NLH device

  1. #1 K252405 Medline ReNewal Reprocessed Boston Scientific…score 10.4 · 1 generation · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K080425CS Refstar Catheter (D- and F-Curves), Models D-1285-01 and D-1285-02
Summary page 5
…Code: NLH Predicate Device: 510(k) Number 510(k) Title Manufacturer K080425 CS RefStar Catheter Biosense Webster Device Description: The Repr…
Biosense Webster, Inc.2008—

Also cleared against K080425: 3 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 34 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 23.5 years on median.
  • None of the 3 ancestors has a recall.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K080425.

How does its category compare?

All NLH devices

NLH Catheter, Recording, Electrode, Reprocessed: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2018, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · NLH

2in 2025

2008: 22009: 12010: 32011: 22012: 12015: 12016: 112017: 42018: 42019: 42020: 22021: 22022: 12023: 12024: 62025: 2
2007high 11 (2016) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NLH

165in 2024

2010: 120 days median2016: 133 days median2017: 138 days median2018: 122 days median2019: 195 days median2024: 165 days median
2007high 195 (2019) · low 120 (2010)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · NLH

28so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2008: 12013: 12016: 32018: 42026 (partial year): 28, 1 Class I
2007high 28 (2026) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · NLH

66in 2025

2007: 12009: 12010: 82011: 102012: 92013: 62014: 172015: 342016: 252017: 112018: 212019: 382020: 282021: 552022: 122023: 302024: 472025: 66
2007high 66 (2025) · low 0 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NLH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—01
20082—10
20091—01
2010312008
20112—010
20121—09
20130—16
20140—017
20151—034
201611133325
20174138011
20184122421
20194195038
20202—028
20212—055
20221—012
20231—030
20246165047
20252—066
20260—28 (1)—

What is it indicated for?

The Reprocessed DecNav Catheter is indicated for electrophysiological mapping of cardiac structures i.e., recording and stimulation, including in the Coronary Sinus.

The catheter provides tip location information when used with the compatible Carto 3 EP Navigation Systems.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K180710: Reprocessed DecaNav Diagnostic Electrophysiology Catheter.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K180710

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026