510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2018

ProSun sunlamp products, Luxura sunlamp products

K181455510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 10, 201898-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4635Recalls 2

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Prosun International, LLC · LEJ Booth, Sun Tan

Cleared on Sep 10, 2018 as substantially equivalent to K944015 (Harpo Industries, 1994) after a 98-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1994. It has been recalled 2 times.

Decided
Sep 10, 2018
Review
98 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LEJ
Recalls
2
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K944015 (1994). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K944015 · Harpo Sunbed, Sun Tanning Machine · Harpo Industries · 19941990199520002005201020152020
K944015 · Harpo Sunbed, Sun Tanning Machine · Harpo Industries · 19940
  1. Root · 1 generation backK944015 Harpo Sunbed, Sun Tanning MachineHarpo Industries · 1994
  2. This deviceK181455 ProSun sunlamp products, Luxura sunlamp productsProsun International, LLC · 2018
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K944015Harpo Sunbed, Sun Tanning MachineHarpo Industries1994—
0 (this device)K181455ProSun sunlamp products, Luxura sunlamp productsProsun International, LLC2018—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K181455, 1994–2018Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LEJ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LEJ device

  1. #1 K221523 Tanning Lampscore 5.2 · 2 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K944015Harpo Sunbed, Sun Tanning Machine
Summary page 8
…Prosun 12 /24 24 Series 12V Canopy Tanner Series 9520183‐008 9212092‐00 K944015 24J 24 Series JADE 24 Jade 24 Prosun 24 Series 9520183‐008 9520183‐04 K944015 24…
Harpo Industries1994—

Also cleared against K944015: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Dec 10, 2018Class IIZ-1177-2019Employee errorProSun International LLC discovered discrepancies in their Quality Control Checklist documentation, which could result in high UV output.
Dec 10, 2018Class IIZ-1176-2019Employee errorProSun International LLC discovered discrepancies in their Quality Control Checklist documentation, which could result in high UV output.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K944015.

How does its category compare?

All LEJ devices

LEJ Booth, Sun Tan: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2018, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · LEJ

1in 2023

2009: 12015: 92016: 112017: 12018: 62019: 32022: 12023: 1
2007high 11 (2016) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LEJ

105in 2019

2015: 102 days median2016: 247 days median2018: 106 days median2019: 105 days median
2007high 247 (2016) · low 102 (2015)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LEJ

1in 2017

2017: 1
2007high 1 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LEJ

1in 2025

2008: 12009: 12011: 22012: 292013: 42014: 92015: 42017: 92018: 42019: 12020: 32022: 42023: 22024: 22025: 1
2007high 29 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LEJ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—01
20091—01
20100—00
20110—02
20120—029
20130—04
20140—09
2015910204
20161124700
20171—19
2018610604
2019310501
20200—03
20210—00
20221—04
20231—02
20240—02
20250—01
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

Tanning Bed Systems are intended to provide tanning of the human skin.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K181455: ProSun sunlamp products, Luxura sunlamp products.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K181455

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026