510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

CardioFlux with Faraday Analytical Cloud

K182571510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 15, 2019178-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2340

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Genetesis, Inc. · DPS Electrocardiograph

Cleared on Mar 15, 2019 as substantially equivalent to K151135 (Tristan Technologies, Inc., 2016) after a 178-day review. Its family tree reaches back 4 generations to 1990.

Decided
Mar 15, 2019
Review
178 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DPS
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 4 generations to K901215 (1990). 5 ancestors in all, the oldest K760542 (1976). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 4 generations backK901215 700 Series BiomagnetometerBiomagnetic Technologies, Inc. · 1990
  2. 3 generations backK962764 Neuromag-122Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc. · 1996
  3. 2 generations backK033488 Cmi MagnetocardiographCmi Cardiomag Imaging, Inc. · 2004
  4. 1 generation backK151135 Model 621/624 BiomagnetometerTristan Technologies, Inc. · 2016
  5. This deviceK182571 CardioFlux with Faraday Analytical CloudGenetesis, Inc. · 2019
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−4K901215700 Series BiomagnetometerBiomagnetic Technologies, Inc.1990—
−3K962764Neuromag-122Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland), Inc.1996—
−2K033488Cmi MagnetocardiographCmi Cardiomag Imaging, Inc.2004—
−1K151135Model 621/624 BiomagnetometerTristan Technologies, Inc.2016—
0 (this device)K182571CardioFlux with Faraday Analytical CloudGenetesis, Inc.2019—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
197610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K182571, 1990–2019Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DPS? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DPS device

  1. #1 K212112 Cardiologs Holter Platformscore 18.6 · 5 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K151135Model 621/624 Biomagnetometer
Summary page 4
…netocardiograph COMMON NAME: Magnetocardiograph DEVICE CLASS: Class II CLASSIFICATION NAME: Electrocardiograph (21 CFR 870.2340) PRODUCT CODE: DPS PREDICATE DEVICE(S): K151135 Tristan Technologies Model 621/624 Biomagnetometer DEVICE DESCRIPTION: The CardioFlux FAC Magnetocardiograph (MCG) is a biomagn…
Tristan Technologies, Inc.2016—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 29 years and passes through 5 companies; a new generation was cleared every 7.7 years on median.
  • None of the 5 ancestors has a recall.

How does its category compare?

All DPS devices

DPS Electrocardiograph: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2019, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · DPS

6in 2025

2007: 112008: 132009: 142010: 112011: 222012: 122013: 102014: 112015: 82016: 112017: 92018: 142019: 32020: 62021: 52022: 62023: 102024: 82025: 62026 (partial year): 6
2007high 22 (2011) · low 3 (2019)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DPS

163in 2025

2007: 87 days median2008: 31 days median2009: 84 days median2010: 104 days median2011: 154 days median2012: 117 days median2013: 134 days median2014: 253 days median2015: 178 days median2016: 229 days median2017: 177 days median2018: 221 days median2019: 178 days median2020: 224 days median2021: 135 days median2022: 244 days median2023: 236 days median2024: 260 days median2025: 163 days median2026 (partial year): 258 days median
2007high 260 (2024) · low 31 (2008)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DPS

3in 2025

2007: 22009: 12010: 22011: 12019: 92020: 22021: 12022: 12023: 32024: 4, 1 Class I2025: 32026 (partial year): 4
2007high 9 (2019) · low 0 (2008)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DPS

55in 2025

2007: 92008: 172009: 142010: 212011: 1212012: 562013: 152014: 152015: 302016: 122017: 152018: 192019: 272020: 592021: 242022: 592023: 542024: 642025: 55
2007high 121 (2011) · low 9 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DPS, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007118729
20081331017
20091484114
201011104221
2011221541121
201212117056
201310134015
201411253015
20158178030
201611229012
20179177015
201814221019
20193178927
20206224259
20215135124
20226244159
202310236354
202482604 (1)64
20256163355
202662584—

What is it indicated for?

The CardioFlux FAC Magnetocardiograph is intended for use as a tool which non-invasively measures and displays the magnetic signals produced by the electric currents of the heart.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K182571: CardioFlux with Faraday Analytical Cloud.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K182571

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026