510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2024

ADVIA Centaur Erythropoietin (EPO) assay

K183088510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 2, 2019269-day reviewClass II21 CFR 864.7250Recalls 2

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Axis-Shield Diagnostics Limited · GGT Assay, Erythropoietin

Cleared on Aug 2, 2019 as substantially equivalent to K052223 (Beckman Coulter, Inc., 2006) after a 269-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1996. It has been recalled 2 times.

Decided
Aug 2, 2019
Review
269 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GGT
Recalls
2
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K952559 (1996). 7 ancestors in all, the oldest K902639 (1990). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 2000: 1 other ancestor1999: 1 other ancestor1994: 1 other ancestor1990: 1 other ancestorK952559 · Erythropoietin Immunoassay Kit · Nichols Institute · 1996K980737 · Advantage Chemiluminescence Erythropoietin Immunoassay · Nichols Institute Diagnostics · 1999K052223 · Access Epo Assay · Beckman Coulter, Inc. · 2006 · recalled1990199520002005201020152020
  1. Root · 3 generations backK952559 Erythropoietin Immunoassay KitNichols Institute · 1996
  2. 2 generations backK980737 Advantage Chemiluminescence Erythropoietin ImmunoassayNichols Institute Diagnostics · 1999
  3. 1 generation backK052223 Access Epo AssayBeckman Coulter, Inc. · 2006 · Recalled
  4. This deviceK183088 ADVIA Centaur Erythropoietin (EPO) assayAxis-Shield Diagnostics Limited · 2019
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K952559Erythropoietin Immunoassay KitNichols Institute1996—
−2K980737Advantage Chemiluminescence Erythropoietin ImmunoassayNichols Institute Diagnostics1999—
−1K052223Access Epo AssayBeckman Coulter, Inc.20061
0 (this device)K183088ADVIA Centaur Erythropoietin (EPO) assayAxis-Shield Diagnostics Limited2019—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199010
199410
199910
200010
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K183088, 1996–2019Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GGT? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new GGT device

  1. #1 K240182 Access EPOscore 7.8 · 3 generations · no Class I recall
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K052223Access Epo Assay
Summary page 4
…lassification: Class II Classification Panel: Hematology Product Code: GGT F. Legally marketed device to which equivalency is claimed: Beckman Coulter Access EPO Assay (K052223) Section_006 1 of 12 510(k) Summary v2 G. I…
Beckman Coulter, Inc.20061

Also cleared against K052223: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jan 24, 2024Class IIZ-1280-2024Under Investigation by firmSiemens Healthcare Diagnostics has confirmed an average negative bias of -35% compared to the 3rd World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard (NIBSC code: 11/170) that is proportional across the assay measuring interval. The…
Jan 24, 2024Class IIZ-1281-2024Under Investigation by firmSiemens Healthcare Diagnostics has confirmed an average negative bias of -35% compared to the 3rd World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard (NIBSC code: 11/170) that is proportional across the assay measuring interval. The…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 23 years and passes through 4 companies; a new generation was cleared every 7.5 years on median.
  • 1 of the 7 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K052223.

How does its category compare?

All GGT devices

GGT Assay, Erythropoietin: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2019, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · GGT

1in 2024

2019: 12024: 1
2007high 1 (2019) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GGT

Too few GGT 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · GGT

No recall names GGT since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · GGT

3in 2012

2012: 3
2007high 3 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GGT, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—03
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20191—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20241—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The ADVIA Centaur® Erythropoietin (EPO) assay is for in vitro diagnostic use in the quantitative measurement of erythropoietin in pediatric and adult human serum or plasma (K2-EDTA, lithium heparin, sodium heparin) using the ADVIA Centaur XP system.

Measurement of erythropoietin is used as an aid in the diagnosis of anemias and polycythemias..

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K183088: ADVIA Centaur Erythropoietin (EPO) assay.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K183088

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026