510(k) · Cleared
Recalled · Class II · 2021MAMBA and MAMBA Flex Microcatheters
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Boston Scientific Corporation · DQY Catheter, Percutaneous
Cleared on Mar 15, 2019 as substantially equivalent to K171452 (Boston Scientific Corporation, 2017) after a 24-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2017. It has been recalled 2 times.
- Decided
- Mar 15, 2019
- Review
- 24 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- DQY
- Recalls
- 2
- Predicates
- 1
Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K171452 (2017). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.
- Root · 1 generation backK171452 MAMBA and MAMBA FLEX MicrocathetersBoston Scientific Corporation · 2017
- This deviceK190401 MAMBA and MAMBA Flex MicrocathetersBoston Scientific Corporation · 2019
View FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | K171452 | MAMBA and MAMBA FLEX Microcatheters | Boston Scientific Corporation | 2017 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K190401 | MAMBA and MAMBA Flex Microcatheters | Boston Scientific Corporation | 2019 | — |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in DQY? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new DQY device
- #1 K234115 APRO 55 Catheterscore 17.5 · 6 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K171452 | MAMBA and MAMBA FLEX MicrocathetersSummary page 4…DQY Classification Class II, 21 CFR Part 870.1250 MAMBA™ and MAMBA™ Flex Predicate Device Microcatheters K171452 (21 Aug 2017) Acuity Pro Guide catheter Reference Device K171612 (30 Jun 2017) === Page 5… | 2017 |
| † | K171612 | ACUITY Pro Lead Delivery System | 2017 |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
Recalls of this device
| Date | Class | Recall | Root cause | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2021 | Class II | Z-1429-2021 | Labeling False and Misleading | The firm initiated a removal of certain batches of MAMBA 135 and MAMBA Flex 135 Microcatheters due to incorrect labeling and packaging. |
| Mar 5, 2021 | Class II | Z-1430-2021 | Labeling False and Misleading | The firm initiated a removal of certain batches of MAMBA 135 and MAMBA Flex 135 Microcatheters due to incorrect labeling and packaging. |
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- Its one ancestor has no recall.
How does its category compare?
All DQY devicesDQY Catheter, Percutaneous: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2019, this device’s year, is highlighted.
FDA decisions per year · DQY
21in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · DQY
115in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · DQY
1in 2025
Class I (10 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · DQY
3,056in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code DQY, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 16 | 85 | 6 | 313 |
| 2008 | 31 | 66 | 12 | 496 |
| 2009 | 37 | 73 | 17 | 819 |
| 2010 | 22 | 74 | 32 | 1,293 |
| 2011 | 36 | 71 | 6 | 1,211 |
| 2012 | 30 | 87 | 2 | 1,191 |
| 2013 | 32 | 92 | 36 (1) | 1,352 |
| 2014 | 19 | 127 | 3 | 1,497 |
| 2015 | 27 | 118 | 3 | 2,337 |
| 2016 | 22 | 117 | 22 (7) | 2,252 |
| 2017 | 26 | 113 | 8 | 2,489 |
| 2018 | 25 | 106 | 2 | 2,855 |
| 2019 | 30 | 111 | 1 | 2,902 |
| 2020 | 20 | 120 | 2 | 2,889 |
| 2021 | 18 | 81 | 2 | 3,006 |
| 2022 | 18 | 74 | 0 | 2,643 |
| 2023 | 18 | 114 | 17 | 3,049 |
| 2024 | 16 | 87 | 1 | 3,190 |
| 2025 | 21 | 115 | 1 (1) | 3,056 |
| 2026 | 11 | 30 | 2 (1) | — |
What is it indicated for?
The MAMBA and MAMBA Flex Microcatheters are intended to provide support to facilitate the placement of guidewires in the coronary vasculature, and can be used to exchange one guidewire for another.
The microcatheters are also intended to assist in the delivery of contrast media into the coronary vasculature.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K190401 · printed Nov 5, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K190401: MAMBA and MAMBA Flex Microcatheters.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K190401
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026