510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Enhanced External Counter Pulsation Device Plus Omay-A

K191955510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 5, 2020380-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.5225

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Omay (Guangzhou)Med Technologies Co., Ltd. · DRN Device, Counter-Pulsating, External

Cleared on Aug 5, 2020 as substantially equivalent to K130439 (Chongqing Psk Sci-Tech Development Co., Ltd., 2013) after a 380-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2013.

Decided
Aug 5, 2020
Review
380 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DRN
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K130439 (2013). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 1 generation backK130439 External Counterpulsation Device with SP02 MornitoringChongqing Psk Sci-Tech Development Co., Ltd. · 2013
  2. This deviceK191955 Enhanced External Counter Pulsation Device Plus Omay-AOmay (Guangzhou)Med Technologies Co., Ltd. · 2020
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K130439External Counterpulsation Device with SP02 MornitoringChongqing Psk Sci-Tech Development Co., Ltd.2013—
0 (this device)K191955Enhanced External Counter Pulsation Device Plus Omay-AOmay (Guangzhou)Med Technologies Co., Ltd.2020—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K191955, 2013–2020Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DRN? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DRN device

  1. #1 K250756 Pression Wave PRO External Counter-Pulsation…score 10.9 · 2 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K130439External Counterpulsation Device with SP02 Mornitoring
Summary page 4
…gqing Psk Sci-tech Development Co., Ltd. Trade/Device Name: External Counterpulsation Device with SPO2 Monitoring Model: P-ECP/TI 510(k) #: K130439 2) Reference Device Sponsor: Vamed Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Device Name: External Counterpulsation Syste…
Chongqing Psk Sci-Tech Development Co., Ltd.2013—
†K190683External Counterpulsation SystemVamed Medical Instrument Co., Ltd.2019—

Also cleared against K130439: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K130439.

How does its category compare?

All DRN devices

DRN Device, Counter-Pulsating, External: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2020, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · DRN

1in 2025

2008: 12009: 12013: 12015: 12018: 12019: 12020: 22025: 1
2007high 2 (2020) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DRN

Too few DRN 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · DRN

1in 2009

2009: 1
2007high 1 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DRN

1in 2024

2007: 22016: 12024: 1
2007high 2 (2007) · low 0 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DRN, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—02
20081—00
20091—10
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20131—00
20140—00
20151—00
20160—01
20170—00
20181—00
20191—00
20202—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20240—01
20251—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The OM-A device is intended for the treatment of chronic stable angina that is refractory to optimal anti-anginal medical therapy and without options for revascularization. In addition, it is intended for use in healthy patients to provide improvement in vasodilation, and increased blood flow. It is intended for use under the oversight of a healthcare professional.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K191955: Enhanced External Counter Pulsation Device Plus Omay-A.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K191955

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026