510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2023

Medical Radiation Dosimetry System microSTARii

K192196510(k) TraditionalCleared Dec 27, 2019136-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.5050Recalls 39

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Landauer · IYE Accelerator, Linear, Medical

Cleared on Dec 27, 2019 as substantially equivalent to K092285 (Best Medical Canada, Ltd., 2009) after a 136-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2009. It has been recalled 39 times.

Decided
Dec 27, 2019
Review
136 days
Class
Class II
Product code
IYE
Recalls
39
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K092285 (2009). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K092285 · Portable Dosimeter Dose Verification System, Model TD-RD-90 · Best Medical Canada, Ltd. · 20092005201020152020
  1. Root · 1 generation backK092285 Portable Dosimeter Dose Verification System, Model TD-RD-90Best Medical Canada, Ltd. · 2009
  2. This deviceK192196 Medical Radiation Dosimetry System microSTARiiLandauer · 2019
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K092285Portable Dosimeter Dose Verification System, Model TD-RD-90Best Medical Canada, Ltd.2009—
0 (this device)K192196Medical Radiation Dosimetry System microSTARiiLandauer2019—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K192196, 2009–2019Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in IYE? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new IYE device

  1. #1 K252977 Halcyon, Ethos Radiotherapy System (5.0)score 18.8 · 18 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K092285Portable Dosimeter Dose Verification System, Model TD-RD-90
Summary page 4
…icle radiation therapy system Device Classification: Class II Product Code: IYE Predicate Device(s): Portable Dosimeter, K092285 Best Medical Canada, Ltd. Class II, Product Code IY…
Best Medical Canada, Ltd.2009—

Also cleared against K092285: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Nov 15, 2023Class IIZ-0616-2024OtherMicroSTARii readers may be contributing to the nanodot dosimeter measurement inaccuracy in two possible ways. The first is related to the interaction of the reader s LED beam profile with the nanoDot dosimeter. The second is debris…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2545-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2565-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2551-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2552-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2569-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2538-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2574-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2555-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2567-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2548-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2546-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2547-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2549-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2544-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2568-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2561-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2553-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2564-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2539-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2554-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2563-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2566-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2557-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2550-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2560-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2573-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2541-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2556-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2570-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2559-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2558-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2562-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2571-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2575-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2543-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2540-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2542-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…
Jul 12, 2023Class IIZ-2572-2023Under Investigation by firmLANDAUER received reports indicating that some nanoDots may potentially be outside of the specified range of +/-5.5% accuracy. Investigation of nanoDots indicated the presence of a potential non-conformance in the Optical Stimulated…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K092285.

How does its category compare?

All IYE devices

IYE Accelerator, Linear, Medical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2019, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · IYE

12in 2025

2007: 232008: 142009: 202010: 232011: 112012: 282013: 182014: 202015: 202016: 212017: 232018: 212019: 192020: 202021: 192022: 122023: 182024: 92025: 122026 (partial year): 14
2007high 28 (2012) · low 9 (2024)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · IYE

170in 2025

2007: 44 days median2008: 69 days median2009: 63 days median2010: 74 days median2011: 94 days median2012: 106 days median2013: 88 days median2014: 100 days median2015: 108 days median2016: 97 days median2017: 94 days median2018: 58 days median2019: 83 days median2020: 67 days median2021: 86 days median2022: 172 days median2023: 129 days median2024: 239 days median2025: 170 days median2026 (partial year): 120 days median
2007high 239 (2024) · low 44 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · IYE

1in 2025

2007: 782008: 492009: 222010: 272011: 732012: 202013: 112014: 142015: 82016: 72017: 72018: 72019: 22020: 42021: 52022: 32023: 72024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 4
2007high 78 (2007) · low 1 (2024)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · IYE

101in 2025

2007: 1552008: 1142009: 1742010: 2462011: 2802012: 1282013: 962014: 1242015: 1002016: 972017: 1252018: 852019: 912020: 742021: 682022: 662023: 1282024: 812025: 101
2007high 280 (2011) · low 66 (2022)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code IYE, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007234478155
2008146949114
2009206322174
2010237427246
2011119473280
20122810620128
201318881196
20142010014124
2015201088100
20162197797
201723947125
20182158785
20191983291
20202067474
20211986568
202212172366
2023181297128
20249239181
2025121701101
2026141204—

What is it indicated for?

The LANDAUER® microSTAR®ii Medical Dosimetry System provides an accurate, reliable and easy-to-use dosimeter and reader intended for use in measuring dose on-phantom or on-patient in medical dosimetry applications, such as radiotherapy and diagnostic radiology. When used to measure patient dose, the system is used to provide a secondary verification of radiation dose as a means of Quality Control for the primary dose calculation method. The output of the microSTAR®ii system is not used to adjust the dose to the patient.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K192196: Medical Radiation Dosimetry System microSTARii.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K192196

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026