510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Neo

K192889510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 30, 2020112-day reviewClass II21 CFR 882.1400

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Eemagine Medical Imaging Solutions GmbH · OMA Amplitude-Integrated Electroencephalograph

Cleared on Jan 30, 2020 as substantially equivalent to K093949 (Natus Medical, Inc., 2010) after a 112-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2010.

Decided
Jan 30, 2020
Review
112 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OMA
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K093949 (2010). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 1 generation backK093949 Olympic Brainz Monitor Model OBM70001Natus Medical, Inc. · 2010
  2. This deviceK192889 NeoEemagine Medical Imaging Solutions GmbH · 2020
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K093949Olympic Brainz Monitor Model OBM70001Natus Medical, Inc.2010—
0 (this device)K192889NeoEemagine Medical Imaging Solutions GmbH2020—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K192889, 2010–2020Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in OMA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K093949Olympic Brainz Monitor Model OBM70001
Summary page 5
…amplifier • Mounting plate • nëo User Manual Substantial equivalence: The nëo™ system is substantially equivalent to the Olympic Brainz Monitor (K093949, June 16, 2010). Summary of technological characteristics compared to predicate devices: Device Feature…
Natus Medical, Inc.2010—
†K152301Background Pattern Classification [BPc (TM)]Natus Medical Incorporated Dba Excel-Tech Ltd. (Xltek)2016—

Also cleared against K093949: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K093949.

How does its category compare?

All OMA devices

OMA Amplitude-Integrated Electroencephalograph: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2020, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OMA

1in 2020

2007: 12008: 22010: 22012: 12013: 22015: 12016: 22017: 12020: 1
2007high 2 (2008) · low 0 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OMA

Too few OMA 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · OMA

No recall names OMA since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · OMA

2in 2024

2016: 12023: 12024: 2
2007high 2 (2024) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OMA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20082—00
20090—00
20102—00
20110—00
20121—00
20132—00
20140—00
20151—00
20162—01
20171—00
20180—00
20190—00
20201—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—01
20240—02
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The nëo monitor is an 8-channel electroencephalograph (EEG) acquisition software. The device is intended to record and display EEG and aEEG signals for monitoring the brain status of neonatal patients (defined as from birth to 28 days post-delivery, and corresponding to a postconceptual age of 24 to 46 weeks). The device is to be used in a hospital environment by qualified clinical practitioners. The device does not provide any diagnostic conclusion about the patient's condition to the user.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K192889: Neo.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K192889

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026