510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

SpineFrontier Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device System

K193106510(k) SpecialCleared Jun 19, 2020224-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Spinefrontier, Inc. · MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar

Cleared on Jun 19, 2020 as substantially equivalent to K142504 (Spinefrontier, Inc., 2015) after a 224-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 1996.

Decided
Jun 19, 2020
Review
224 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MAX
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to P950002 (1996). 11 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 5 generations backP950002 Bak Interbody Fusion SystemZimmer Spine, Inc. · 1996
  2. 4 generations backK072289 Spinefrontier Dorado VBRSpinefrontier, Inc. · 2007
  3. 3 generations backK091638 Dorado Wide Intervertebral Body Cage, Models: IM2010-IM2031Spinefrontier, Inc. · 2009
  4. 2 generations backK111553 Spinefrontier Lumbar Ibf SystemSpinefrontier, Inc. · 2011
  5. 1 generation backK142504 SpineFrontier Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device SystemSpinefrontier, Inc. · 2015
  6. This deviceK193106 SpineFrontier Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device SystemSpinefrontier, Inc. · 2020
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−5P950002Bak Interbody Fusion SystemZimmer Spine, Inc.1996—
−4K072289Spinefrontier Dorado VBRSpinefrontier, Inc.2007—
−3K091638Dorado Wide Intervertebral Body Cage, Models: IM2010-IM2031Spinefrontier, Inc.2009—
−2K111553Spinefrontier Lumbar Ibf SystemSpinefrontier, Inc.2011—
−1K142504SpineFrontier Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device SystemSpinefrontier, Inc.2015—
0 (this device)K193106SpineFrontier Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device SystemSpinefrontier, Inc.2020—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199910
200740
201010
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K193106, 1996–2020Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MAX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MAX device

  1. #1 K203714 NuVasive Thoracolumbar Interbody Systems…score 102.5 · 24 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K142504SpineFrontier Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device System
Summary page 5
…try • Principles of operation Table 5-1 Predicate Devices 510k Number Trade or Proprietary or Model Name Manufacturer Designation K142504 SpineFrontier Lumbar Interbody Fusion SpineFrontier, Inc. Primary Device System PER…
Spinefrontier, Inc.2015—

Also cleared against K142504: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 24 years and passes through 2 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.6 years on median.
  • 2 of the 11 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K142504.

How does its category compare?

All MAX devices

MAX Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2020, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MAX

29in 2025

2007: 72008: 352009: 312010: 292011: 492012: 482013: 582014: 582015: 532016: 642017: 762018: 642019: 602020: 562021: 532022: 412023: 302024: 382025: 292026 (partial year): 18
2007high 76 (2017) · low 7 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MAX

85in 2025

2007: 86 days median2008: 88 days median2009: 102 days median2010: 137 days median2011: 98 days median2012: 69 days median2013: 102 days median2014: 115 days median2015: 113 days median2016: 124 days median2017: 116 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 131 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 109 days median2022: 95 days median2023: 87 days median2024: 91 days median2025: 85 days median2026 (partial year): 95 days median
2007high 137 (2010) · low 69 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MAX

5in 2025

2008: 22009: 92011: 32012: 11, 1 Class I2014: 32015: 12016: 62017: 12018: 42019: 12022: 12024: 12025: 5
2007high 11 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MAX

811in 2025

2007: 122008: 192009: 902010: 1542011: 2012012: 3272013: 3802014: 3662015: 5242016: 6472017: 5962018: 6162019: 6992020: 6402021: 6222022: 6182023: 5762024: 7292025: 811
2007high 811 (2025) · low 12 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007786012
20083588219
200931102990
2010291370154
201149983201
2012486911 (1)327
2013581020380
2014581153366
2015531131524
2016641246647
2017761161596
2018641144616
2019601311699
2020561060640
2021531090622
202241951618
202330870576
202438911729
202529855811
202618950—

What is it indicated for?

The SpineFrontier Lumbar lnterbody Fusion Device System (Dorado IBC, Dorado PLIFT, Dorado ELIFT, Arena-L, Dorado TILT, Dorado TLIFT, Dorado Wide, and Ursa S-LIFT) is intended for intervertebral body fusion of the spine of skeletally mature patients, using autogenous bone graft to facilitate fusion. The device is indicated for use in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous spinal levels from L2-S1. These DDD patients may…

Read the full statement (140 words)

The SpineFrontier Lumbar lnterbody Fusion Device System (Dorado IBC, Dorado PLIFT, Dorado ELIFT, Arena-L, Dorado TILT, Dorado TLIFT, Dorado Wide, and Ursa S-LIFT) is intended for intervertebral body fusion of the spine of skeletally mature patients, using autogenous bone graft to facilitate fusion. The device is indicated for use in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous spinal levels from L2-S1. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s).

Degenerative disc disease is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history or radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally mature and have had six months of non-operative treatment.

The SpineFrontier Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device System is intended to be used with supplemental spinal fixation system(s) cleared for use in the lumbar spine.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K193106: SpineFrontier Lumbar Interbody Fusion Device System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K193106

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026