510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

CER-S

K193177510(k) TraditionalCleared Aug 26, 2020282-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2800

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Cardiocalm · MLO Electrocardiograph, Ambulatory, With Analysis Algorithm

Cleared on Aug 26, 2020 as substantially equivalent to K042002 (Ela Medical, Inc., 2004) after a 282-day review. Its family tree reaches back 5 generations to 1994. 2 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Aug 26, 2020
Review
282 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MLO
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 5 generations to K930806 (1994). 22 ancestors in all, the oldest K871344 (1987). 2 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2001: 2 other ancestors1999: 1 other ancestor1995: 4 other ancestors1990: 3 other ancestors1997: 1 other ancestor1996: 1 other ancestor1994: 1 other ancestor1992: 2 other ancestors1987: 2 other ancestors2022: 1 descendant cleared2025: 1 descendant clearedK930806 · Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010 · Agilent Technologies · 1994K955015 · Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010 · Zymed Medical Instrumentation · 1996K982090 · Paceart Home Trak Plus Easi Event Recorder System · Paceart, Inc. · 1999K020213 · Netlink/Netscan · Rozinn Electronics, Inc. · 2002K042002 · Synescope, Easyscope, Synecom, Holterreader · Ela Medical, Inc. · 20041990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 2 generations back: 5 other ancestors3 generations back: 7 other ancestors4 generations back: 5 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 1 descendant K042002 · Synescope, Easyscope, Synecom, Holterreader · Ela Medical, Inc. · 2004K020213 · Netlink/Netscan · Rozinn Electronics, Inc. · 2002K982090 · Paceart Home Trak Plus Easi Event Recorder System · Paceart, Inc. · 1999K955015 · Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010 · Zymed Medical Instrumentation · 1996K930806 · Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010 · Agilent Technologies · 1994−50
  1. Root · 5 generations backK930806 Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010Agilent Technologies · 1994
  2. 4 generations backK955015 Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010Zymed Medical Instrumentation · 1996
  3. 3 generations backK982090 Paceart Home Trak Plus Easi Event Recorder SystemPaceart, Inc. · 1999
  4. 2 generations backK020213 Netlink/NetscanRozinn Electronics, Inc. · 2002
  5. 1 generation backK042002 Synescope, Easyscope, Synecom, HolterreaderEla Medical, Inc. · 2004
  6. This deviceK193177 CER-SCardiocalm · 2020
  7. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK213861 CER-SCardiocalm Srl · 2022
  8. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK243312 CER-SCardiocalm Srl · 2025

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K213861CER-SCardiocalm Srl · 2022 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K243312CER-SCardiocalm Srl · 2025 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−5K930806Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010Agilent Technologies1994—
−4K955015Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010Zymed Medical Instrumentation1996—
−3K982090Paceart Home Trak Plus Easi Event Recorder SystemPaceart, Inc.1999—
−2K020213Netlink/NetscanRozinn Electronics, Inc.2002—
−1K042002Synescope, Easyscope, Synecom, HolterreaderEla Medical, Inc.2004—
0 (this device)K193177CER-SCardiocalm2020—
+1K213861CER-SCardiocalm Srl2022—
+2K243312CER-SCardiocalm Srl2025—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198720
199030
199220
199410
199540
199610
199710
199910
200120

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202210
202510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K193177, 1994–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MLO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MLO device

  1. #1 K261580 ZBPro Diagnostic (Version 2.0)score 13.8 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K042002Synescope, Easyscope, Synecom, Holterreader
Summary page 4
…DQK Name of Predicate Device 510(k) # Manufacturer SyneScopeTM, EasyScopeTM, SyneComTM K042002 Sorin Group HolterReader (Ela Medic…
Ela Medical, Inc.2004—

What descends from it? (2)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K213861CER-SCardiocalm Srl20221

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 26 years and passes through 6 companies; a new generation was cleared every 2.9 years on median.
  • 2 of the 22 ancestors have a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K213861 (Cardiocalm Srl, 2022) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.

How does its category compare?

All MLO devices

MLO Electrocardiograph, Ambulatory, With Analysis Algorithm: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2020, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MLO

1in 2025

2007: 12010: 12011: 32012: 12013: 22014: 12018: 12020: 22024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 3 (2011) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MLO

238in 2011

2011: 238 days median
2007high 238 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MLO

2in 2024

2024: 2
2007high 2 (2024) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MLO

4in 2025

2009: 52010: 12011: 12014: 12017: 12018: 12019: 12021: 12022: 12023: 12024: 22025: 4
2007high 5 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MLO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20080—00
20090—05
20101—01
2011323801
20121—00
20132—00
20141—01
20150—00
20160—00
20170—01
20181—01
20190—01
20202—00
20210—01
20220—01
20230—01
20241—22
20251—04
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

CER-S is a stand-alone software medical device intended to analyze, edit, review and report digital continuous ECG recordings. CER-S is intended for use in clinical and hospital settings only by qualified medical personnel or adequately trained professional personnel working under the supervision and responsibility of a clinician. Users must undergo a thorough software training before using the medical device. The device provides the clinician an…

Read the full statement (151 words)

CER-S is a stand-alone software medical device intended to analyze, edit, review and report digital continuous ECG recordings.

CER-S is intended for use in clinical and hospital settings only by qualified medical personnel or adequately trained professional personnel working under the supervision and responsibility of a clinician. Users must undergo a thorough software training before using the medical device.

The device provides the clinician an additional tool to aid in the interpretation of ECG data for diagnosis of heart rhythm disorders in adult and pediatric patients.

Note: This device does not provide an automated interpretation and is not intended for use as the only diagnostic tool.

CER-S analysis provides indications for, but not limited to, evaluation of:

Patients with rhythm disturbances (cardiac arrhythmias),

Patients with transient myocardial ischemia,

Patients with pacemaker (only if pacing detection is available from the input recording),

Patients needing HRV evaluation,

Newborn patients limited to QRS detection.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K193177: CER-S.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K193177

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026