510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

THD Procto Software System

K193512510(k) TraditionalCleared Jan 26, 202039-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.1560

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Thd Spa · IYO System, Imaging, Pulsed Echo, Ultrasonic

Cleared on Jan 26, 2020 as substantially equivalent to K140899 (Halo Medical Technologies, LLC, 2014) after a 39-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 2008. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Jan 26, 2020
Review
39 days
Class
Class II
Product code
IYO
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K081781 (2008). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

  1. Root · 2 generations backK081781 NUWAVLaborie Medical Technologies, Corp. · 2008
  2. 1 generation backK140899 Halo Medical Technologies Catalyst Midcrystl Halo Ultrasound SystemHalo Medical Technologies, LLC · 2014
  3. This deviceK193512 THD Procto Software SystemThd Spa · 2020
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK211623 THD Procto Software SystemThd Spa · 2021

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K211623THD Procto Software SystemThd Spa · 2021 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K081781NUWAVLaborie Medical Technologies, Corp.2008—
−1K140899Halo Medical Technologies Catalyst Midcrystl Halo Ultrasound SystemHalo Medical Technologies, LLC2014—
0 (this device)K193512THD Procto Software SystemThd Spa2020—
+1K211623THD Procto Software SystemThd Spa2021—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K193512, 2008–2021Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in IYO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new IYO device

  1. #1 K243937 Accuro 3Sscore 20.5 · 18 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K140899Halo Medical Technologies Catalyst Midcrystl Halo Ultrasound System
Summary page 4
…ing device: Applicant Device name 510(k) Number Halo Medical CatalySt, MidCRYSTL, HALO K140899 Technologies Ultrasound System Predicate device Interson Corporation Interson U…
Halo Medical Technologies, LLC2014—
†K163443Interson USB Ultrasound SystemInterson Corporation2017—

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K211623THD Procto Software SystemThd Spa20210

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 12 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 5.8 years on median.
  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K211623 (Thd Spa, 2021) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All IYO devices

IYO System, Imaging, Pulsed Echo, Ultrasonic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2020, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · IYO

7in 2025

2007: 202008: 142009: 132010: 152011: 112012: 152013: 172014: 142015: 192016: 102017: 192018: 142019: 132020: 112021: 152022: 52023: 112024: 102025: 72026 (partial year): 10
2007high 20 (2007) · low 5 (2022)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · IYO

171in 2025

2007: 17 days median2008: 36 days median2009: 79 days median2010: 113 days median2011: 69 days median2012: 68 days median2013: 50 days median2014: 63 days median2015: 46 days median2016: 36 days median2017: 72 days median2018: 56 days median2019: 59 days median2020: 57 days median2021: 64 days median2022: 190 days median2023: 177 days median2024: 220 days median2025: 171 days median2026 (partial year): 139 days median
2007high 220 (2024) · low 17 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · IYO

1in 2022

2007: 42008: 52009: 92010: 82012: 22013: 32014: 22015: 12018: 12019: 12021: 112022: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 11 (2021) · low 0 (2011)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · IYO

485in 2025

2007: 392008: 202009: 272010: 202011: 582012: 782013: 4362014: 3042015: 2682016: 2542017: 2382018: 3682019: 5372020: 4982021: 6172022: 5112023: 5272024: 6402025: 485
2007high 640 (2024) · low 20 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code IYO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072017439
20081436520
20091379927
201015113820
20111169058
20121568278
201317503436
201414632304
201519461268
201610360254
201719720238
201814561368
201913591537
202011570498
2021156411617
202251901511
2023111770527
2024102200640
202571710485
2026101391—

What is it indicated for?

The THD Procto Software 1is a software that can be used:

* In endoanal ultrasound (EAUS), in order to help evaluate pelvic floor disorders by processing and recording images of tissue structures in the pelvic region with the aid of a dedicated ultrasound probe. This is done by inserting the probe into the anal canal, acquiring the ultrasound signal and letting the software process the image.

* In Anoscopy exams in order to record images and videos of the anorectal channel, which are acquired through a dedicated video camera that provides images with a resolution greater than 1.1 MPx through USB protocol

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K193512: THD Procto Software System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K193512

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026