510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Anterior Spine Truss System – Stand Alone (ASTS-SA) Interbody Fusion Device

K200002510(k) TraditionalCleared May 29, 2020148-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3080

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

4Web, Inc. · OVD Intervertebral Fusion Device With Integrated Fixation, Lumbar

Cleared on May 29, 2020 after a 148-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 8 later devices descend from it.

Decided
May 29, 2020
Review
148 days
Class
Class II
Product code
OVD
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

8 later devices descend from it, 3 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2024: 2 descendants cleared2020: 1 descendant cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared2025: 2 descendants cleared2026: 2 descendants cleared2020202220242026
  1. This deviceK200002 Anterior Spine Truss System – Stand Alone (ASTS-SA) Interbody Fusion…4Web, Inc. · 2020
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 4 of its ownK201585 Monterey AL Interbody SystemStryker Corporation · 2020 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK250072 CONDUIT™ SYNFIX™ Evolution Secured Spacer SystemAvalign Technologies, Inc. · 2025
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK233966 Anterior Spine Truss System-Stand Alone (ASTS-SA)4Web Medical, Inc. · 2024
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 1 of its ownK221490 Tritanium C Anterior Cervical Cage, Tritanium PL Cage, Tritanium TL…Stryker Spine · 2023
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 0 of its ownK262061 Tritanium® C Anterior Cervical Cage; Tritanium® PL Cage; Tritanium®…Stryker Spine · 2026

Showing 5 of 8 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2020: 12023: 12024: 22025: 22026: 2
2020high 2 (2024) · low 0 (2021)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 8 · See all
  • K201585Monterey AL Interbody SystemStryker Corporation · 2020 · cites it directly4descendants
  • K250072CONDUIT™ SYNFIX™ Evolution Secured Spacer SystemAvalign Technologies, Inc. · 2025 · 2 generations on1descendant
  • K233966Anterior Spine Truss System-Stand Alone (ASTS-SA)4Web Medical, Inc. · 2024 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K221490Tritanium C Anterior Cervical Cage, Tritanium PL Cage, Tritanium TL Curved Posterior…Stryker Spine · 2023 · 2 generations on1descendant
  • K262061Tritanium® C Anterior Cervical Cage; Tritanium® PL Cage; Tritanium® TL Curved Posterior…Stryker Spine · 2026 · 3 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K200002Anterior Spine Truss System – Stand Alone (ASTS-SA) Interbody Fusion Device4Web, Inc.2020—
+1K201585Monterey AL Interbody SystemStryker Corporation20204
+2K250072CONDUIT™ SYNFIX™ Evolution Secured Spacer SystemAvalign Technologies, Inc.2025—
+1K233966Anterior Spine Truss System-Stand Alone (ASTS-SA)4Web Medical, Inc.2024—
+2K221490Tritanium C Anterior Cervical Cage, Tritanium PL Cage, Tritanium TL Curved…Stryker Spine2023—
+3K262061Tritanium® C Anterior Cervical Cage; Tritanium® PL Cage; Tritanium® TL Curved…Stryker Spine2026—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202010
202310
202420
202520
202620
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K200002, 2020–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in OVD? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new OVD device

  1. #1 K222009 aprevo® anterior lumbar interbody fusion…score 26.0 · 23 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (4)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—4WEB Anterior Spine Truss System (ASTS)
Named without a submission number
—
*—4WEB Cervical Spine Truss System – Stand Alone
Named without a submission number
—
*—Globus Independence Spacers
Named without a submission number
—
*—Titan Endoskeleton TAS Interbody Fusion Device
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (8)

3 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K201585Monterey AL Interbody SystemStryker Corporation20204
K233966Anterior Spine Truss System-Stand Alone (ASTS-SA)4Web Medical, Inc.20241
K234077SPIRA® Anterior Lumbar SpacersCamber Spine Technologies20240

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K201585 (Stryker Corporation, 2020) has gone furthest, with 4 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All OVD devices

OVD Intervertebral Fusion Device With Integrated Fixation, Lumbar: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2020, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OVD

10in 2025

2007: 22008: 82009: 32010: 82011: 92012: 102013: 112014: 142015: 122016: 132017: 122018: 142019: 122020: 142021: 72022: 142023: 122024: 122025: 102026 (partial year): 8
2007high 14 (2014) · low 2 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OVD

100in 2025

2008: 84 days median2009: 152 days median2010: 117 days median2011: 167 days median2012: 78 days median2013: 137 days median2014: 139 days median2015: 166 days median2016: 127 days median2017: 127 days median2018: 126 days median2019: 91 days median2020: 91 days median2021: 108 days median2022: 133 days median2023: 92 days median2024: 110 days median2025: 100 days median2026 (partial year): 93 days median
2007high 167 (2011) · low 78 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · OVD

1in 2025

2013: 42016: 12021: 12022: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 4 (2013) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · OVD

50in 2025

2009: 22010: 22011: 62012: 162013: 172014: 352015: 432016: 552017: 722018: 1122019: 1712020: 2032021: 2212022: 742023: 672024: 922025: 50
2007high 221 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OVD, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—00
200888400
2009315202
2010811702
2011916706
20121078016
201311137417
201414139035
201512166043
201613127155
201712127072
2018141260112
201912910171
202014910203
202171081221
202214133174
20231292067
202412110092
202510100150
20268931—

What is it indicated for?

The Anterior Spine Truss System – Stand Alone (ASTS-SA) Interbody Fusion Device is a standalone interbody fusion device indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) of the lumbosacral spine at one or two contiguous disc levels. Each interbody fusion device is intended to be used with three titanium alloy screws which accompany the implant. Hyperlordotic implants (>20° lordosis) are intended to be used with…

Read the full statement (150 words)

The Anterior Spine Truss System – Stand Alone (ASTS-SA) Interbody Fusion Device is a standalone interbody fusion device indicated for use in skeletally mature patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) of the lumbosacral spine at one or two contiguous disc levels. Each interbody fusion device is intended to be used with three titanium alloy screws which accompany the implant. Hyperlordotic implants (>20° lordosis) are intended to be used with supplemental fixation (e.g. posterior fixation). DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies. ASTS-SA Interbody Fusion Devices are used as an adjunct to fusion in the lumbosacral spine and are placed via an anterior approach at the L2 to S1 disc levels using autograft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft. Patients should have received 6 months of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with the devices.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K200002: Anterior Spine Truss System – Stand Alone (ASTS-SA) Interbody Fusion Device.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K200002

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026